2009 NFL Thread

Anything goes, all topics welcome!

Moderator: CameronBornAndBred

User avatar
cl15876
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5505
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:04 pm
Location: Dumfries, VA
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by cl15876 » October 5th, 2009, 9:14 pm

cl15876 wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Fahv-ruh just scored on his old team with a pretty pass...preceded by a pretty drive.
OMG, and I am watching "DANCING with the STARS" and missing out on the testosterone but seeing alot of RUB-BAAAA ttt going on and OMG, it is MUCH HOTTER!!!! I would have to say as a guy, I'd be patting those BAAAAA ttts if I were on the show! I love to ball room dance, it is AAAAAA L O ttts of FUN!!!!! :ymblushing: ;) :D
Zee Rumba is such an erotic dance when done correctly!!!!! Donny Osmund is currently dancing with Kym and OMG .... he sucks (sorry CathyCA, he just sings rock n roll), but OMG, I will give it to him that he only had a week of practice.... Oh, well, some of us have it and some of us sing rock -n- roll!!!! =)) =)) =)) =))
User avatar
cl15876
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5505
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:04 pm
Location: Dumfries, VA
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by cl15876 » October 5th, 2009, 10:01 pm

OMG, Favre just got a HUGE BREAK!!!!! Will he score?
User avatar
cl15876
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5505
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:04 pm
Location: Dumfries, VA
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by cl15876 » October 5th, 2009, 10:02 pm

NOPE, Peterson scores on EASY RUN IN!!! Wasn't even touched, OMG!!!! 21-14 Vikings!!!!
User avatar
cl15876
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5505
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:04 pm
Location: Dumfries, VA
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by cl15876 » October 5th, 2009, 10:03 pm

OMG, I can't believe he is 40 (that's ancient)! Look at all that GREY!!!! He should be in a wheel chair......
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by Miles » October 5th, 2009, 11:02 pm

They should rename this night "Favre Night Football". Favre is automatic, a robot tonight. Even though I'm not impressed with his recent displays of megalomania, I must admit that it has been a pleasure to watch him play tonight.
sMiles
User avatar
cl15876
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5505
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:04 pm
Location: Dumfries, VA
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by cl15876 » October 5th, 2009, 11:07 pm

Miles wrote:They should rename this night "Favre Night Football". Favre is automatic, a robot tonight. Even though I'm not impressed with his recent displays of megalomania, I must admit that it has been a pleasure to watch him play tonight.
concur, I wish I was enjoying my Woodie!!! OZZIE, where are you!!!! I may have to get DD or TNT to step in!!!! =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =))
rockymtn devil
Part Time Student at PWing school
Part Time Student at PWing school
Posts: 476
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 8:23 pm

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by rockymtn devil » October 6th, 2009, 9:39 pm

I'm still not sold on Favre. After last night, the media has come around and declared him back to old Favre. To paraphrase former President Bush, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice...you can't get fooled again. After the Jets' huge Monday Night win against New England in Week 11 last season, the media wrote the same sort of stuff they've been rushing to print today. But a funny thing happened on the way to the Super Bowl for the Jets. Favre wore down and single-handedly prevented that team from making the postseason. As this season progresses, teams will load the box to stop AP and force Favre to throw downfield, which I don't think he can do (or, better yet, I don't think he will be able to do after about November 1st).
:ymbilly: vs. :ymhiro: Ken vs. Ryu. Classic.
User avatar
wilson
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4683
Joined: April 28th, 2009, 4:33 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by wilson » October 6th, 2009, 9:43 pm

rockymtn devil wrote:I'm still not sold on Favre. After last night, the media has come around and declared him back to old Favre. To paraphrase former President Bush, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice...you can't get fooled again. After the Jets' huge Monday Night win against New England in Week 11 last season, the media wrote the same sort of stuff they've been rushing to print today. But a funny thing happened on the way to the Super Bowl for the Jets. Favre wore down and single-handedly prevented that team from making the postseason. As this season progresses, teams will load the box to stop AP and force Favre to throw downfield, which I don't think he can do (or, better yet, I don't think he will be able to do after about November 1st).
Totally agreed...I've been saying the same thing since before BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE BRETT FAVRE even signed to don purple.
One big difference, though: I think that playing in a dome will help keep him from wearing down as much or as fast, and I think last year's AFC East was better than any NFC North for the entirety of that division's existence.
Image
User avatar
wilson
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4683
Joined: April 28th, 2009, 4:33 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by wilson » October 6th, 2009, 9:46 pm

wilson wrote:One big difference, though: I think that playing in a dome will help keep him from wearing down as much or as fast, and I think last year's AFC East was better than any NFC North for the entirety of that division's existence.
OK, so that's two differences. But anyway.
Image
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by Miles » October 7th, 2009, 9:51 am

rockymtn devil wrote:I'm still not sold on Favre. After last night, the media has come around and declared him back to old Favre. To paraphrase former President Bush, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice...you can't get fooled again. After the Jets' huge Monday Night win against New England in Week 11 last season, the media wrote the same sort of stuff they've been rushing to print today. But a funny thing happened on the way to the Super Bowl for the Jets. Favre wore down and single-handedly prevented that team from making the postseason. As this season progresses, teams will load the box to stop AP and force Favre to throw downfield, which I don't think he can do (or, better yet, I don't think he will be able to do after about November 1st).
I'm not sold either, and I still think he's a pretty big turd for the way he's been acting over the last few years. Damn it was fun to watch him Monday night.
sMiles
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 16016
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by CameronBornAndBred » October 11th, 2009, 2:54 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote:Delhomme sucks...and is a whiner. He didn't always suck...and he didn't always whine. He has learned to do both well.
Just reiterating...Delhomme sucks.
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by Miles » October 11th, 2009, 3:01 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Delhomme sucks...and is a whiner. He didn't always suck...and he didn't always whine. He has learned to do both well.
Just reiterating...Delhomme sucks.
The entire Panther's offense is anemic. The offensive line lacks depth and skill and I don't care who your quarterback is, if you can't protect him he's going to make mistakes. It's a team sport, and the entire team just isn't very good, Jake or no Jake.
sMiles
User avatar
wilson
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4683
Joined: April 28th, 2009, 4:33 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by wilson » October 11th, 2009, 3:04 pm

Miles wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Delhomme sucks...and is a whiner. He didn't always suck...and he didn't always whine. He has learned to do both well.
Just reiterating...Delhomme sucks.
The entire Panther's offense is anemic. The offensive line lacks depth and skill and I don't care who your quarterback is, if you can't protect him he's going to make mistakes. It's a team sport, and the entire team just isn't very good, Jake or no Jake.
The Panthers:
-DeAngelo Williams
-Jon Beason
-Steve Smith
-50 scrubs...Well, OK, perhaps a bit of an exaggeration. I always kind of liked Brad Hoover, but he's not really anything special.
Image
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by Miles » October 11th, 2009, 3:07 pm

wilson wrote:
Miles wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote: Just reiterating...Delhomme sucks.
The entire Panther's offense is anemic. The offensive line lacks depth and skill and I don't care who your quarterback is, if you can't protect him he's going to make mistakes. It's a team sport, and the entire team just isn't very good, Jake or no Jake.
The Panthers:
-DeAngelo Williams
-Jon Beason
-Steve Smith
-50 scrubs...Well, OK, perhaps a bit of an exaggeration. I always kind of liked Brad Hoover, but he's not really anything special.
I loathe Steve Smith. It is becoming more and more obvious that if you can get in his head you can take away his entire game. He's also one-dimensional and pretty much a supreme prick. Lump him together with TO, and Chad Ochocinco.
sMiles
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by Miles » October 11th, 2009, 3:09 pm

I do like the name Captain Munnerlyn.
sMiles
User avatar
wilson
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4683
Joined: April 28th, 2009, 4:33 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by wilson » October 11th, 2009, 3:10 pm

Miles wrote:I loathe Steve Smith. It is becoming more and more obvious that if you can get in his head you can take away his entire game. He's also one-dimensional and pretty much a supreme prick. Lump him together with TO, and Chad Ochocinco.
Well, at least if the Panthers follow through and lose at home to the 'Skins, they can just let the young QB play and start building for the future.
Oh, wait. The Panthers have cast their lot entirely with Jake Delhomme and not bothered to draft a QB since Chris Weinke. The next option on the depth chart is sweet slingin' Matt Moore.
Thanks for playing, Charlotte. Enjoy the basement for the next several years, and thank you for the ~8 automatic wins while your franchise attempts to regain relevance. :-bd :ymapplause: :))
Image
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by Miles » October 11th, 2009, 3:18 pm

wilson wrote:
Miles wrote:I loathe Steve Smith. It is becoming more and more obvious that if you can get in his head you can take away his entire game. He's also one-dimensional and pretty much a supreme prick. Lump him together with TO, and Chad Ochocinco.
Well, at least if the Panthers follow through and lose at home to the 'Skins, they can just let the young QB play and start building for the future.
Oh, wait. The Panthers have cast their lot entirely with Jake Delhomme and not bothered to draft a QB since Chris Weinke. The next option on the depth chart is sweet slingin' Matt Moore.
Thanks for playing, Charlotte. Enjoy the basement for the next several years, and thank you for the ~8 automatic wins while your franchise attempts to regain relevance. :-bd :ymapplause: :))
Give Delhomme an offensive line, say the '82 Hogs and you've got a Super Bowl trophy in Charlotte.
sMiles
User avatar
wilson
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4683
Joined: April 28th, 2009, 4:33 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by wilson » October 11th, 2009, 3:21 pm

Miles wrote:
wilson wrote:
Miles wrote:I loathe Steve Smith. It is becoming more and more obvious that if you can get in his head you can take away his entire game. He's also one-dimensional and pretty much a supreme prick. Lump him together with TO, and Chad Ochocinco.
Well, at least if the Panthers follow through and lose at home to the 'Skins, they can just let the young QB play and start building for the future.
Oh, wait. The Panthers have cast their lot entirely with Jake Delhomme and not bothered to draft a QB since Chris Weinke. The next option on the depth chart is sweet slingin' Matt Moore.
Thanks for playing, Charlotte. Enjoy the basement for the next several years, and thank you for the ~8 automatic wins while your franchise attempts to regain relevance. :-bd :ymapplause: :))
Give Delhomme an offensive line, say the '82 Hogs and you've got a Super Bowl trophy in Charlotte.
Disagree, strongly. Jake Delhomme has never been that special as a QB. The only thing that ever got the Panthers close to Super Bowl caliber was several years of superlative defense.
Image
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by Miles » October 11th, 2009, 4:14 pm

wilson wrote:
Miles wrote:
wilson wrote:Well, at least if the Panthers follow through and lose at home to the 'Skins, they can just let the young QB play and start building for the future.
Oh, wait. The Panthers have cast their lot entirely with Jake Delhomme and not bothered to draft a QB since Chris Weinke. The next option on the depth chart is sweet slingin' Matt Moore.
Thanks for playing, Charlotte. Enjoy the basement for the next several years, and thank you for the ~8 automatic wins while your franchise attempts to regain relevance. :-bd :ymapplause: :))
Give Delhomme an offensive line, say the '82 Hogs and you've got a Super Bowl trophy in Charlotte.
Disagree, strongly. Jake Delhomme has never been that special as a QB. The only thing that ever got the Panthers close to Super Bowl caliber was several years of superlative defense.
I don't think he's been that special of a quarterback either, but you don't have to be to win Super Bowls. Just ask the Ravens, and Bucs. I still think there could be a Super Bowl Trophy in Charlotte if you give him an offensive line that could:
1) Open up holes in the defensive and allow DeAngelo Williams to rush for more than 180 yards in 3 games.
2) Improve upon the 2+ sacks per game they're already allowing.
3) Protect the quarterback long enough so he doesn't have to be hero.

I understand you don't think Delhomme is a good quarterback, but it seems like you're oversimplifying the Panthers' woes. I don't care who your quarterback is, you don't win games with a crappy offensive line. It makes your offensive horribly one-dimensional by taking away the running game, and it puts undue pressure on your quarterback where he will inevitably make the mistakes that we've seen Delhomme make.
sMiles
rockymtn devil
Part Time Student at PWing school
Part Time Student at PWing school
Posts: 476
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 8:23 pm

Re: 2009 NFL Thread

Post by rockymtn devil » October 11th, 2009, 5:09 pm

wilson wrote:Disagree, strongly. Jake Delhomme has never been that special as a QB. The only thing that ever got the Panthers close to Super Bowl caliber was several years of superlative defense.
The guy did go 16 of 33 for 323 yards, 3 TDs and no INTs in the Super Bowl. The Panthers did not lose that game because of Jake Delhomme. They lost because their defense couldn't stop the Patriots. So...but for the "superlative defense", there would be a Lombardi Trophy in Charlotte, and Delhomme would probably be the owner of a Super Bowl MVP award.

Of course, none of that justifies giving him a new contract before the season began.
:ymbilly: vs. :ymhiro: Ken vs. Ryu. Classic.
Post Reply