wilson wrote: Reminds me...I'm due for a big, final (for now) update on my research.
I look forward to reading that.
Moderator: CameronBornAndBred
wilson wrote: Reminds me...I'm due for a big, final (for now) update on my research.
I'd like to see...a conjugation of the verb, 'hang'. In particular, the usage of the past tense.OZZIE4DUKE wrote:I learned about verb tenses and all that type of crap :o the first week of Spanish class in 7th grade. I learned that there was a verb "to be" and that it conjugated as I am, you are, etc. In Spanish: yo soy, tu eres, el es, nosotros somos, etc. I never knew that am and are were forms of to be - I guess I had been absent that day in second grade... :roll: Sure, I'd heard Bill's quote ("to be or not to be"), but "be" just didn't register as "am".ArkieDukie wrote: You know, it's really interesting that you bring this up, because I had exactly the same experience. I don't think I really 'got' verb tenses until I took French. In fact, when I had colleagues and/or students grousing about a foreign language requirement, this is exactly what I told them. Definitely a hidden benefit of taking a foreign language - at least, no one at my high school ever touted this benefit.
Bill's quote, you know - William Shakespeare. I have a friend who goes to "Billsburg", VA on a regular basis.
This is really cool. I'm glad for you.colchar wrote:Again, this doesn't relate directly to the original purpose of this thread but it still deals with an academic matter so I figured this was the place for it . . .
As some of you will know my dissertation deals with British intelligence in Africa during the Cold War (it is tentatively titled "British Intelligence and the Spectre of Communism in Africa, 1948-65"). Well my roommate's aunt is a former CSIS officer (CSIS=Canadian Security Intelligence Service) and for years was their main liaison with the British intelligence services. She had mentioned to me that she knows lots of people who were members of the British intelligence services during the era covered by my dissertation and that some of them were either stationed in Africa or were stationed at home in Britain but dealt with intelligence emanating from Africa. She had asked for a synopsis of my dissertation so that she could pass it along to anyone she knew (and so that they could also pass it along if they so chose) in the hopes that some of them might contact me and be willing to discuss their activities because, at the moment, my sources are all official documents (what I call the 'Whitehall Perspective') and this source-base will have to be expanded as the dissertation progresses - and an oral history component would be an ideal way to expand my source-base. Anyway, she called tonight and said that a couple of people she knows have expressed interest in helping me out so I might be able to conduct some original research with these people which will really help set my dissertation apart!
I figured the academics here (especially my man Wilson) would appreciate just how important a development this is for my research.
Congrats, colchar! I can see why you'd be excited.colchar wrote:Again, this doesn't relate directly to the original purpose of this thread but it still deals with an academic matter so I figured this was the place for it . . .
As some of you will know my dissertation deals with British intelligence in Africa during the Cold War (it is tentatively titled "British Intelligence and the Spectre of Communism in Africa, 1948-65"). Well my roommate's aunt is a former CSIS officer (CSIS=Canadian Security Intelligence Service) and for years was their main liaison with the British intelligence services. She had mentioned to me that she knows lots of people who were members of the British intelligence services during the era covered by my dissertation and that some of them were either stationed in Africa or were stationed at home in Britain but dealt with intelligence emanating from Africa. She had asked for a synopsis of my dissertation so that she could pass it along to anyone she knew (and so that they could also pass it along if they so chose) in the hopes that some of them might contact me and be willing to discuss their activities because, at the moment, my sources are all official documents (what I call the 'Whitehall Perspective') and this source-base will have to be expanded as the dissertation progresses - and an oral history component would be an ideal way to expand my source-base. Anyway, she called tonight and said that a couple of people she knows have expressed interest in helping me out so I might be able to conduct some original research with these people which will really help set my dissertation apart!
I figured the academics here (especially my man Wilson) would appreciate just how important a development this is for my research.
I have a copy, but I don't remember actually reading it.colchar wrote:Reading over some of the comments in here about students and writing makes me believe, more than ever, that every incoming university student, regardless of major but especially those in the Arts and Humanities, should be made to read Strunk and White's The Elements of Style.
When luck hits... THAT IS GREAT!!!! Congrats!!colchar wrote:Again, this doesn't relate directly to the original purpose of this thread but it still deals with an academic matter so I figured this was the place for it . . .
As some of you will know my dissertation deals with British intelligence in Africa during the Cold War (it is tentatively titled "British Intelligence and the Spectre of Communism in Africa, 1948-65"). Well my roommate's aunt is a former CSIS officer (CSIS=Canadian Security Intelligence Service) and for years was their main liaison with the British intelligence services. She had mentioned to me that she knows lots of people who were members of the British intelligence services during the era covered by my dissertation and that some of them were either stationed in Africa or were stationed at home in Britain but dealt with intelligence emanating from Africa. She had asked for a synopsis of my dissertation so that she could pass it along to anyone she knew (and so that they could also pass it along if they so chose) in the hopes that some of them might contact me and be willing to discuss their activities because, at the moment, my sources are all official documents (what I call the 'Whitehall Perspective') and this source-base will have to be expanded as the dissertation progresses - and an oral history component would be an ideal way to expand my source-base. Anyway, she called tonight and said that a couple of people she knows have expressed interest in helping me out so I might be able to conduct some original research with these people which will really help set my dissertation apart!
I figured the academics here (especially my man Wilson) would appreciate just how important a development this is for my research.
Congratulations to both Colchar and Uncle Fred!captmojo wrote:I'd like to see...a conjugation of the verb, 'hang'. In particular, the usage of the past tense.OZZIE4DUKE wrote: I learned about verb tenses and all that type of crap :o the first week of Spanish class in 7th grade. I learned that there was a verb "to be" and that it conjugated as I am, you are, etc. In Spanish: yo soy, tu eres, el es, nosotros somos, etc. I never knew that am and are were forms of to be - I guess I had been absent that day in second grade... :roll: Sure, I'd heard Bill's quote ("to be or not to be"), but "be" just didn't register as "am".
Bill's quote, you know - William Shakespeare. I have a friend who goes to "Billsburg", VA on a regular basis.
example: "My Aunt Martha was hanged for being a horse thief."
"My Uncle Fred was hung like a horse."
Let the discussion begin. I am now required to travel.
This is really cool. I'm glad for you.colchar wrote:Again, this doesn't relate directly to the original purpose of this thread but it still deals with an academic matter so I figured this was the place for it . . .
As some of you will know my dissertation deals with British intelligence in Africa during the Cold War (it is tentatively titled "British Intelligence and the Spectre of Communism in Africa, 1948-65"). Well my roommate's aunt is a former CSIS officer (CSIS=Canadian Security Intelligence Service) and for years was their main liaison with the British intelligence services. She had mentioned to me that she knows lots of people who were members of the British intelligence services during the era covered by my dissertation and that some of them were either stationed in Africa or were stationed at home in Britain but dealt with intelligence emanating from Africa. She had asked for a synopsis of my dissertation so that she could pass it along to anyone she knew (and so that they could also pass it along if they so chose) in the hopes that some of them might contact me and be willing to discuss their activities because, at the moment, my sources are all official documents (what I call the 'Whitehall Perspective') and this source-base will have to be expanded as the dissertation progresses - and an oral history component would be an ideal way to expand my source-base. Anyway, she called tonight and said that a couple of people she knows have expressed interest in helping me out so I might be able to conduct some original research with these people which will really help set my dissertation apart!
I figured the academics here (especially my man Wilson) would appreciate just how important a development this is for my research.
Congratulations!!! I love reading about history first hand.colchar wrote:Again, this doesn't relate directly to the original purpose of this thread but it still deals with an academic matter so I figured this was the place for it . . .
As some of you will know my dissertation deals with British intelligence in Africa during the Cold War (it is tentatively titled "British Intelligence and the Spectre of Communism in Africa, 1948-65"). Well my roommate's aunt is a former CSIS officer (CSIS=Canadian Security Intelligence Service) and for years was their main liaison with the British intelligence services. She had mentioned to me that she knows lots of people who were members of the British intelligence services during the era covered by my dissertation and that some of them were either stationed in Africa or were stationed at home in Britain but dealt with intelligence emanating from Africa. She had asked for a synopsis of my dissertation so that she could pass it along to anyone she knew (and so that they could also pass it along if they so chose) in the hopes that some of them might contact me and be willing to discuss their activities because, at the moment, my sources are all official documents (what I call the 'Whitehall Perspective') and this source-base will have to be expanded as the dissertation progresses - and an oral history component would be an ideal way to expand my source-base. Anyway, she called tonight and said that a couple of people she knows have expressed interest in helping me out so I might be able to conduct some original research with these people which will really help set my dissertation apart!
I figured the academics here (especially my man Wilson) would appreciate just how important a development this is for my research.
WOW! That's very impressive, and the oral history component will distinguish your dissertation from all others.colchar wrote:Again, this doesn't relate directly to the original purpose of this thread but it still deals with an academic matter so I figured this was the place for it . . .
As some of you will know my dissertation deals with British intelligence in Africa during the Cold War (it is tentatively titled "British Intelligence and the Spectre of Communism in Africa, 1948-65"). Well my roommate's aunt is a former CSIS officer (CSIS=Canadian Security Intelligence Service) and for years was their main liaison with the British intelligence services. She had mentioned to me that she knows lots of people who were members of the British intelligence services during the era covered by my dissertation and that some of them were either stationed in Africa or were stationed at home in Britain but dealt with intelligence emanating from Africa. She had asked for a synopsis of my dissertation so that she could pass it along to anyone she knew (and so that they could also pass it along if they so chose) in the hopes that some of them might contact me and be willing to discuss their activities because, at the moment, my sources are all official documents (what I call the 'Whitehall Perspective') and this source-base will have to be expanded as the dissertation progresses - and an oral history component would be an ideal way to expand my source-base. Anyway, she called tonight and said that a couple of people she knows have expressed interest in helping me out so I might be able to conduct some original research with these people which will really help set my dissertation apart!
I figured the academics here (especially my man Wilson) would appreciate just how important a development this is for my research.
It's awfully hard to get away from thinking about it, once you've been to the memorial.TillyGalore wrote:
I've been reading a collection of stories from Pearl Harbor survivors.
Wait a minute! YOU are not going to fail the student. He or she failed himself or herself.TillyGalore wrote:Ugh! I think we're going to have fail a student. They just did not perform well on their last two exams. In fact, they failed both. I hate this feeling.
Good point, thanks. I hope they see it that way. The Director has spoken to the student, but I don't think the student quite grasps how much trouble they are in. I also know that our experience with this student is not limited to our program. The student has had issues in other programs.CathyCA wrote:Wait a minute! YOU are not going to fail the student. He or she failed himself or herself.TillyGalore wrote:Ugh! I think we're going to have fail a student. They just did not perform well on their last two exams. In fact, they failed both. I hate this feeling.
This failure is simply the beginning of a new opportunity to succeed.
I can understand your feelings in this situation.... I've been there many times in my first career. Students are responsible for their work and their conduct especially at the level where you are encountering them. When personal issues interfere as you are describing, better for this student to be derailed now rather than later when the consequences of these issues could effect or harm others. (Don't know all the context, so harm to others could be present to a lesser degree now.)TillyGalore wrote:Good point, thanks. I hope they see it that way. The Director has spoken to the student, but I don't think the student quite grasps how much trouble they are in. I also know that our experience with this student is not limited to our program. The student has had issues in other programs.CathyCA wrote:Wait a minute! YOU are not going to fail the student. He or she failed himself or herself.TillyGalore wrote:Ugh! I think we're going to have fail a student. They just did not perform well on their last two exams. In fact, they failed both. I hate this feeling.
This failure is simply the beginning of a new opportunity to succeed.
Smart move.Turk wrote: 2. Boss sent out an email with this in it: "I want to assure that individuals are not jumping to conclusions about ...." I pointed this out to a teammate and she said "I triple dog dare you to tell her she wanted to use 'ensure' there." Nope. Not going there. Buk-buk-BWAAK!
I make mention of the data/datum issue in ALL of my writing classes.Turk wrote:3. We're a bunch of geeks, but none of us are language geeks enough to use "data" in its proper plural form, as in "the data are inconclusive".
Is that like let the wookiee win, because droids don't rip people's arms off when they lose?windsor wrote:CameronBornAndBred wrote:From Wikipedia---"There are three forms of the plural of octopus; namely, octopuses, octopi, and octopodes."TillyGalore wrote:I thought the plural of octopus was octopussies.
James Bond did not make the list of grammatical options.
I would think twice before correcting the grammar of a man with a license to kill.