LTE 2.0

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:17 pm

wilson wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Anyone notice something funny about Paula?
I think she needs some electrolysis...and perhaps hormones.

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:18 pm

Lavabe wrote:In the spirit of devildeac, I scheduled my colonoscopy today for 9/11. And at the same time, they check my prostate...

$\:D/$ WOO HOO!!
$\:D/$

Are you REALLY sure you want it performed on 9/11?

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:19 pm

Lavabe wrote:In the spirit of devildeac, I scheduled my colonoscopy today for 9/11. And at the same time, they check my prostate...

$\:D/$ WOO HOO!!
$\:D/$

Call me if you need any tips preparing for your exam... :oops: :roll:

Rolvix · Post by **Rolvix** » August 13th, 2009, 6:20 pm

DukeUsul wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:
DA makes a very good point here: you don't always click with the person you interview with. That's true from the interviewer end as well. Hopefully all your interviews will go as well as your Wake interview.
That reminds me of a good interview story. I was interviewing college seniors at UNC for my company. I didn't tell many of them that I was a Duke grad. The next day, one of the strongest candidates emails me a thank you. As his PS he writes:

PS-Please don't let the fact that you're working in Durham lead you to the dark side of becoming a Duke fan.
He was a really good guy and a great candidate, so in no way was I going to let that affect my recommendation on him. My email reply in its entirety was:
Oh Tyler, the subject never came up: I'm a Duke grad, class of 1999.

I just left it at that to see how he'd respond. He replied two minutes later in scramble mode to be nice:
Ahh, I suppose I put my foot in my mouth there. If it makes it any better, I took a class there my junior year that was excellent and I have several close friends here in DC who went to Duke, so we rib each other incessantly. I guess I should be thanking you then for overcoming your disdain for the Tar Heels to come meet with us on Monday! Take care.
So make note for your interviews: never insult a school when you don't know where your interviewer went.

Reading this got me sort of worried, so I checked out her credentials. Luckily she graduated from Meredith, got her Ph. D and Master's of Divinity from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and her M.B.A. at the Babcock Graduate School of Management at Wake Forest. Whew.

So, in other news... My aunt is good friends with the Dean of Admissions at Wake Forest. The Dean wasn't the one interviewing me though, so I thought it wouldn't be worth mentioning the connection. Apparently, after my mom spoke with my aunt today, we discovered that the lade who interviewed me - Mrs. Bridges - knows my aunt/uncle even better! My mom told me that Mrs. Bridges is absolutely in love with my uncle. Who would have guessed? My aunt said she will ask about my interview when she sees Mrs. Bridges at church on Sunday.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Rolvix · Post by **Rolvix** » August 13th, 2009, 6:20 pm

There were 6 or 7 posts posted in the time it took me to type that last one. ^ :shock:

CameronBornAndBred · Post by **CameronBornAndBred** » August 13th, 2009, 6:21 pm

CellR wrote:There were 6 or 7 posts posted in the time it took me to type that last one. ^ :shock:

Type faster.

ArkieDukie · Post by **ArkieDukie** » August 13th, 2009, 6:21 pm

devildeac wrote:And infracted... :roll:

When I first read this I thought you wrote "infarcted." :oops:

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:21 pm

Miles wrote:
Lavabe wrote:In the spirit of devildeac, I scheduled my colonoscopy today for 9/11. And at the same time, they check my prostate...

$\:D/$ WOO HOO!!
$\:D/$
Dinner and a movie with the doc on the tenth?

Dinner with the doc would only be acceptable if Lavabe had clear liquids and about a 1/2 gallon of colon prep with an appetizer of 2 Bisacodyl tabs...

:roll: :roll:

Rolvix · Post by **Rolvix** » August 13th, 2009, 6:22 pm

I guess it did take me a while to look up what school the lady went to.

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:23 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote:
Lavabe wrote:In the spirit of devildeac, I scheduled my colonoscopy today for 9/11. And at the same time, they check my prostate...

$\:D/$ WOO HOO!!
$\:D/$
Will we be getting an adventure thread? You get to recuperate by watching Duke beat up Army on TV.

Is the Duke-Army game gonna be on TV? :roll:

ArkieDukie · Post by **ArkieDukie** » August 13th, 2009, 6:24 pm

devildeac wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:I also devildeaced a bit and replied to posts. I also quoted myself - definitely devildeacesque.
Hey, wait a minute now... :oops: :roll:

Don't I get bonus points for inventing words? :ugeek:

CameronBornAndBred · Post by **CameronBornAndBred** » August 13th, 2009, 6:25 pm

devildeac wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
Lavabe wrote:In the spirit of devildeac, I scheduled my colonoscopy today for 9/11. And at the same time, they check my prostate...

$\:D/$ WOO HOO!!
$\:D/$
Will we be getting an adventure thread? You get to recuperate by watching Duke beat up Army on TV.
Is the Duke-Army game gonna be on TV? :roll:

Yup, CBS College Sports Network at noon.(I know you can have that included in Directv package)

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:25 pm

bjornolf wrote:
wilson wrote:
wilson wrote: Sorry dude, but "dieing" is just not a word. The proper spelling is "dying."

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dieing
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dying
Similarly, you wouldn't write, "I'm tieing my shoes." Rather, it would be, "I'm tying my shoes." That's just how it works.
Plus, "dieing" simply doesn't look right.

I still get confused when trying to conjugate the various versions of "lie" with the lying and the laid vs. layed vs. lied vs. lay and all the other ones. I've looked up the rules a million times, but by the time it becomes an issue, I've forgotten again.

There's another one I'm not touching...

ArkieDukie · Post by **ArkieDukie** » August 13th, 2009, 6:25 pm

devildeac wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:I keep thinking I'm going to stop so I can get ready for work, but this is quite addictive.
In honor of Windsor and all other people who have given up something even more addictive than PWing, I'm going to stop now and get ready for work. Have a great day, all!
Impressive. HIGHLY impressive. :oops: :roll:

What - the 50 (I think) consecutive posts, or the fact that I stopped posting to get ready for work? :lol:

Rolvix · Post by **Rolvix** » August 13th, 2009, 6:25 pm

ArkieDukie wrote:
devildeac wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:I also devildeaced a bit and replied to posts. I also quoted myself - definitely devildeacesque.
Hey, wait a minute now... :oops: :roll:
Don't I get bonus points for inventing words? :ugeek:

+1 point for ArkieDukie.
+50 for 50 consecutive posts! :lol:

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:27 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote:There are 14 users on now, and 9 of them are guests. We are outnumbered.

That may be but I bet we have them out-posted. :roll:

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:27 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote:
CellR wrote:There were 6 or 7 posts posted in the time it took me to type that last one. ^ :shock:
Type faster.

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:29 pm

ArkieDukie wrote:
devildeac wrote:And infracted... :roll:
When I first read this I thought you wrote "infarcted." :oops:

Only my patients get infarcted...

:roll: ;)

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » August 13th, 2009, 6:30 pm

ArkieDukie wrote:
devildeac wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:I keep thinking I'm going to stop so I can get ready for work, but this is quite addictive.

Impressive. HIGHLY impressive. :oops: :roll:
What - the 50 (I think) consecutive posts, or the fact that I stopped posting to get ready for work? :lol:

Both ;)

Rolvix · Post by **Rolvix** » August 13th, 2009, 6:31 pm

My eyes hurt from staring at a screen too long. I think I'll go take a break.

LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0