LTE 2.0

Post by **YmoBeThere** » October 14th, 2009, 8:39 am

My current theory is that we will see a Freeway series. The major media outlets would probably perfer an LA versus Philly/NYY matchup. NYY/Philly and I think you lose a lot of viewers. (well, a freeway series might also have the same effect.)

Post by **YmoBeThere** » October 14th, 2009, 8:41 am

What a mess, I had multiple windows of CTN open...with various posts and threads in each. Can anyone say Adult ADD?

Post by **YmoBeThere** » October 14th, 2009, 8:44 am

I'm home waiting for the cable guy. Well, really the phone/TV/internet guy from the old local phone company. Yeah, I'm going fiberoptic. The coax guys are getting the boot. The local phone co did a much better job of selling. Now if they could only get with the program that the coax guys in the Northeast had. Every service at the higher level (except international channels, sports pkgs, etc.) for one price.

Post by **YmoBeThere** » October 14th, 2009, 8:45 am

I hypothesize that the installation and delivery guys will all show up at around the same time and at the end of the time "window" they have given me.

CameronBornAndBred · Post by **CameronBornAndBred** » October 14th, 2009, 8:45 am

YmoBeThere wrote:I'm home waiting for the cable guy. Well, really the phone/TV/internet guy from the old local phone company. Yeah, I'm going fiberoptic. The coax guys are getting the boot. The local phone co did a much better job of selling. Now if they could only get with the program that the coax guys in the Northeast had. Every service at the higher level (except international channels, sports pkgs, etc.) for one price.

Have fun waiting...he'll be thre between 9 and 5.

OZZIE4DUKE · Post by **OZZIE4DUKE** » October 14th, 2009, 8:54 am

Bostondevil wrote:Tonight I loaded up the puppies in their fancy duds, put on a short skirt and my FMPs and went to dinner with physicists. Yes, you read that right. Norman Ramsey and Wolfgang Ketterle among them. You can Google.

Pictures?

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » October 14th, 2009, 8:57 am

OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
Bostondevil wrote:Tonight I loaded up the puppies in their fancy duds, put on a short skirt and my FMPs and went to dinner with physicists. Yes, you read that right. Norman Ramsey and Wolfgang Ketterle among them. You can Google.
Pictures?

Why am I not surprised :roll: ?
Sham must not be on-line at this time. :roll:

Bostondevil · Post by **Bostondevil** » October 14th, 2009, 10:42 am

OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
Bostondevil wrote:Tonight I loaded up the puppies in their fancy duds, put on a short skirt and my FMPs and went to dinner with physicists. Yes, you read that right. Norman Ramsey and Wolfgang Ketterle among them. You can Google.
Pictures?

None were taken, or at least I avoided being in the ones that were taken.

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » October 14th, 2009, 12:08 pm

Bostondevil wrote:
Lavabe wrote:Well, scientifically, you have an hypothesis there, not a theory. ;).

I may be a nerd, but when talking with the masses, I try not to sound like one. Plus, http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/theory, numbers 2, 6, and 7.

I know, I know, but scientific theories (with the scientific method) are much more than conjecture (which is an acceptable common vernacular definition). The #1 definition is proper for a scientific theory... which is what I was using in my response. ;)

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » October 14th, 2009, 12:09 pm

YmoBeThere wrote:I hypothesize that the installation and delivery guys will all show up at around the same time and at the end of the time "window" they have given me.

You hypothesize... I'd be guessing. ;)

Bostondevil · Post by **Bostondevil** » October 14th, 2009, 12:29 pm

Lavabe wrote:I know, I know, but scientific theories (with the scientific method) are much more than conjecture (which is an acceptable common vernacular definition). The #1 definition is proper for a scientific theory... which is what I was using in my response. ;)

What, exactly, is scientific about love? (Besides all those PBS shows on pheromones.) ;)

Post by **YmoBeThere** » October 14th, 2009, 1:23 pm

Yeah, this thing is much faster than coax...

Post by **wilson** » October 14th, 2009, 1:40 pm

I saw the Toy Story double feature in 3-D last night. They seemed like they'd been made for 3-D all along, with all of the texture that Up had and no "gimmick" shots. The films also carry an existential weight that was entirely lost on me the first time around. I had a great time.

Post by **YmoBeThere** » October 14th, 2009, 2:37 pm

I postulated this morning, but I didn't know what I was talking about.

windsor · Post by **windsor** » October 14th, 2009, 3:29 pm

CellR wrote:Send me some vibes for my court date tomorrow!

Oh crap...I've been nutso busy with a deployment at work...didn't see this until now....

I hope the vibes a retroactive and everything went well for you!

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » October 14th, 2009, 3:56 pm

YmoBeThere wrote:I postulated this morning, but I didn't know what I was talking about.

You better postulate about your NASCAR picks quickly... EARLY deadline on them this week!!

bjornolf · Post by **bjornolf** » October 14th, 2009, 3:56 pm

Lavabe wrote:
Was Jerry Maguire a men's rom-com? If so, I liked that movie. Same with Bull Durham!

Bull Durham could probably be labeled as a romantic comedy. I think Jerry Maguire probably falls short on the comedy end. It's a little too serious.

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » October 14th, 2009, 3:57 pm

Bostondevil wrote:
Lavabe wrote:I know, I know, but scientific theories (with the scientific method) are much more than conjecture (which is an acceptable common vernacular definition). The #1 definition is proper for a scientific theory... which is what I was using in my response. ;)
What, exactly, is scientific about love? (Besides all those PBS shows on pheromones.) ;)

LOL!! You beat me to my response!!

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » October 14th, 2009, 4:03 pm

bjornolf wrote:
Lavabe wrote:
Was Jerry Maguire a men's rom-com? If so, I liked that movie. Same with Bull Durham!
Bull Durham could probably be labeled as a romantic comedy. I think Jerry Maguire probably falls short on the comedy end. It's a little too serious.

Serious? "Jerry Eff'ing Maguire" is serious?

Nope -- the kid, Cuba Gooding Jr, Bonnie Hunt, Jay Mohr -- it is definitely more comedic than "serious."

I guess we have a difference of opinion.

Bostondevil · Post by **Bostondevil** » October 14th, 2009, 4:17 pm

Just in case you were wondering, BD is a knitting enabler. And proud of it.

LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0

Re: LTE 2.0