LTE 2.0

Anything goes, all topics welcome!

Moderator: CameronBornAndBred

User avatar
colchar
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4120
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:12 pm
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by colchar » October 17th, 2010, 2:58 pm

ArkieDukie wrote:I'm watching "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip" on Netflix. I really like this show - never could figure out why it wasn't a bigger hit. Discovered another reason to like it tonight: one of the characters had a Duke banner on her bulletin board.

I loved that show and was disappointed when it was canceled. IIRC, it was canceled due to the high per episode cost rather than particularly poor ratings.
". . . when a man is tired of London, he is tired of life; for there is in London all that life can afford."
— Samuel Johnson

----------

2010 & 2012 CTN NASCAR Fantasy League Champion. No lemurs were harmed in the winning of these titles.

----------
ArkieDukie
Pwing School Dean
Posts: 7637
Joined: April 9th, 2009, 7:40 am
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by ArkieDukie » October 17th, 2010, 3:31 pm

colchar wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:I'm watching "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip" on Netflix. I really like this show - never could figure out why it wasn't a bigger hit. Discovered another reason to like it tonight: one of the characters had a Duke banner on her bulletin board.

I loved that show and was disappointed when it was canceled. IIRC, it was canceled due to the high per episode cost rather than particularly poor ratings.
That sounds about right - Matthew Perry, Bradley Whitford, Timothy Busfield, Steven Weber, and Amanda Peet couldn't have had low salaries. Not sure about Sarah Paulson.

There was a hilarious bit with Bradley Whitford's character where he was ranting about not having product placement in the show. He was eating a Snickers bar at the time. :)) Such a clever show. Unfortunately those tend to be the ones that don't last.
Most people say that is it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong: it is character.
-- Albert Einstein
lawgrad91
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 13084
Joined: April 14th, 2010, 9:52 pm
Location: Walkertown NC/Varnish County VA

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by lawgrad91 » October 17th, 2010, 3:47 pm

CathyCA wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:Major Freudian slip in bulletin insert this morning. The Methodists are having a coffee project to buy fair trade coffee, chocolate, etc. We are invited to buy a case of coffee "for your panty." Or a case of decaf for the same location. Insert blushing smilie here.
I think that a case of fair trade coffee might be good for your panty. It would certainly get you and your panty moving in the morning, wouldn't it?
Nothing like a case of coffee to get one's panty up and at 'em. (I'm not sure the decaf would have the same effect.) :ymblushing:
Iron Duke #1471997.
User avatar
colchar
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4120
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:12 pm
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by colchar » October 17th, 2010, 5:06 pm

ArkieDukie wrote:
colchar wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:I'm watching "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip" on Netflix. I really like this show - never could figure out why it wasn't a bigger hit. Discovered another reason to like it tonight: one of the characters had a Duke banner on her bulletin board.

I loved that show and was disappointed when it was canceled. IIRC, it was canceled due to the high per episode cost rather than particularly poor ratings.
That sounds about right - Matthew Perry, Bradley Whitford, Timothy Busfield, Steven Weber, and Amanda Peet couldn't have had low salaries. Not sure about Sarah Paulson.

There was a hilarious bit with Bradley Whitford's character where he was ranting about not having product placement in the show. He was eating a Snickers bar at the time. :)) Such a clever show. Unfortunately those tend to be the ones that don't last.

I think the networks also had a major bidding war for this show when it was first conceived and the high cost paid for it was also factored into the per episode cost which, when added to the salaries, made the cost even higher.

Personally, I am pissed that A) they dumped J.J. (A.J. Cook) from Criminal Minds and seem to be squeezing Prentice (Paget Brewster) out a bit as she has been forced to accept a reduced role while all of this seems geared toward saving money on the original and putting it into the spinoff; B) that they got rid of the original Law & order in favour of the cheaper Law & Order: Los Angeles spinoff and have yet to cancel the abysmal Law & Order: Criminal Intent - if they had wanted to save money they should've canceled that one; and C) that Raising the Bar was canceled as I was really enjoying that show.

And yet, they continue to feed people an unending diet of crappy reality shows simply because they are cheaper to produce. If only people would refuse to be sucked in and stop watching them, maybe we could get some decent shows back on TV. I won't hold my breath though.
". . . when a man is tired of London, he is tired of life; for there is in London all that life can afford."
— Samuel Johnson

----------

2010 & 2012 CTN NASCAR Fantasy League Champion. No lemurs were harmed in the winning of these titles.

----------
ArkieDukie
Pwing School Dean
Posts: 7637
Joined: April 9th, 2009, 7:40 am
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by ArkieDukie » October 17th, 2010, 5:18 pm

colchar wrote:I think the networks also had a major bidding war for this show when it was first conceived and the high cost paid for it was also factored into the per episode cost which, when added to the salaries, made the cost even higher.

Personally, I am pissed that A) they dumped J.J. (A.J. Cook) from Criminal Minds and seem to be squeezing Prentice (Paget Brewster) out a bit as she has been forced to accept a reduced role while all of this seems geared toward saving money on the original and putting it into the spinoff; B) that they got rid of the original Law & order in favour of the cheaper Law & Order: Los Angeles spinoff and have yet to cancel the abysmal Law & Order: Criminal Intent - if they had wanted to save money they should've canceled that one; and C) that Raising the Bar was canceled as I was really enjoying that show.

And yet, they continue to feed people an unending diet of crappy reality shows simply because they are cheaper to produce. If only people would refuse to be sucked in and stop watching them, maybe we could get some decent shows back on TV. I won't hold my breath though.
Colchar, I think we must have similar taste in television shows. The firing of A.J. Cook was disgraceful, as is the diminshed role of Paget Brewster. Especially when this is juxtaposed with the ridiculously high salary that Charlie Sheen is being paid. And I refuse to watch any of the reality TV shows.
Most people say that is it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong: it is character.
-- Albert Einstein
User avatar
DevilAlumna
Graduate Student at PWing school
Graduate Student at PWing school
Posts: 1300
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 12:13 am
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by DevilAlumna » October 17th, 2010, 7:39 pm

ArkieDukie wrote: And I refuse to watch any of the reality TV shows.
Same here. (Except for Top Chef & Project Runway,... guilty as charged there. But at least, they're about real skills and not ALL about the drama.)
User avatar
captmojo
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5096
Joined: April 12th, 2009, 12:20 pm
Location: It's lonely out in space on such a timeless flight.

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by captmojo » October 17th, 2010, 7:47 pm

I admit to interests only in 'American Pickers', Pawn Stars' and these paranormal things on A&E Sunday nights.
The 'Swamp People' show is fascinating.
What I don't care about are the contest style reality things.
"Backboards? Backboards? I'll show'em what to do with a f%#kin' backboard!"
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 16148
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by CameronBornAndBred » October 17th, 2010, 8:34 pm

captmojo wrote:I admit to interests only in 'American Pickers', Pawn Stars' and these paranormal things on A&E Sunday nights.
The 'Swamp People' show is fascinating.
What I don't care about are the contest style reality things.
Pickers is great fun. Pawn Stars is too. I enjoy both because they introduce real Americana history in them. I've never watched Swamp Road Ice Truckers. I hope they slide off the frozen pond into a gaping gator mouth.
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
User avatar
Lavabe
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 11122
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 8:02 pm
Location: Land of the Lost, Kentucky (pining for the fjords of Madagascar)

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by Lavabe » October 17th, 2010, 9:21 pm

DevilAlumna wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote: And I refuse to watch any of the reality TV shows.
Same here. (Except for Top Chef & Project Runway,... guilty as charged there. But at least, they're about real skills and not ALL about the drama.)
I like most stuff on Food Network: Iron Chef, The Best Thing I Ever Ate, Unwrapped... those are reality shows.
American Idol, Deadliest Catch (especially OPIE season), the Bear Grylls type shows, etc...
Will sometimes look at Dancing With the Stars.

My wife is a fan of SAY YES TO THE DRESS and HOUSEHUNTERS.
2014, 2011, and 2009 Lemur Loving CTN NASCAR Champ. No lasers were used to win these titles.
User avatar
captmojo
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5096
Joined: April 12th, 2009, 12:20 pm
Location: It's lonely out in space on such a timeless flight.

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by captmojo » October 17th, 2010, 9:26 pm

These people driving Alaska's Ice road are idiots allowing money to overload common sense.
Pickers? I've done this. It can earn a LOT of money. Too irregular, and too much travel, and being away from home, and the dealing with all that goes with being an independant contractor. I had to get out of it and get a real job that let others deal with all the legal issues and pressures.
I got lots of nice antiques, collectables and education from it, however.
"Backboards? Backboards? I'll show'em what to do with a f%#kin' backboard!"
User avatar
DukieInKansas
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 6611
Joined: May 3rd, 2009, 11:48 pm
Location: Kansas - scientist's say it's flatter than a pancake - cross it on a bicycle and you won't agree.

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by DukieInKansas » October 18th, 2010, 4:43 pm

I received another box at the office today. Six bottles of a 2005 Benning Hill cabernet that received wonderful reviews. I like unexpected presents like these.
Life is good!
lawgrad91
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 13084
Joined: April 14th, 2010, 9:52 pm
Location: Walkertown NC/Varnish County VA

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by lawgrad91 » October 18th, 2010, 4:50 pm

DukieInKansas wrote:I received another box at the office today. Six bottles of a 2005 Benning Hill cabernet that received wonderful reviews. I like unexpected presents like these.
:happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: Nice! :)
Iron Duke #1471997.
User avatar
CathyCA
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 11483
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 9:38 pm
Location: Greenville, North Carolina

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by CathyCA » October 18th, 2010, 5:03 pm

DukieInKansas wrote:I received another box at the office today. Six bottles of a 2005 Benning Hill cabernet that received wonderful reviews. I like unexpected presents like these.
Very nice.
“The invention of basketball was not an accident. It was developed to meet a need. Those boys simply would not play 'Drop the Handkerchief.'”

~ James Naismith
User avatar
YmoBeThere
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 6912
Joined: April 13th, 2009, 7:36 pm
Location: South Central...Tejas

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by YmoBeThere » October 18th, 2010, 6:56 pm

DukieInKansas wrote:I received another box at the office today. Six bottles of a 2005 Benning Hill cabernet that received wonderful reviews. I like unexpected presents like these.

Random unexplained gifts? Interesting, very interesting...
User avatar
DukieInKansas
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 6611
Joined: May 3rd, 2009, 11:48 pm
Location: Kansas - scientist's say it's flatter than a pancake - cross it on a bicycle and you won't agree.

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by DukieInKansas » October 18th, 2010, 10:13 pm

YmoBeThere wrote:
DukieInKansas wrote:I received another box at the office today. Six bottles of a 2005 Benning Hill cabernet that received wonderful reviews. I like unexpected presents like these.

Random unexplained gifts? Interesting, very interesting...
There is actually an explanation - I'm doing some things for my brother and this is a thank you gift. The result is that I have some nice wine to enjoy. I see a party in my future.
Life is good!
User avatar
devildeac
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 18965
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 11:10 pm
Location: Nowhere near the hell in which unc finds itself.

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by devildeac » October 18th, 2010, 11:25 pm

DukieInKansas wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:
DukieInKansas wrote:I received another box at the office today. Six bottles of a 2005 Benning Hill cabernet that received wonderful reviews. I like unexpected presents like these.

Random unexplained gifts? Interesting, very interesting...
There is actually an explanation - I'm doing some things for my brother and this is a thank you gift. The result is that I have some nice wine to enjoy. I see a party in my future.
And 20-30 of us at CTN see a road trip in our future. :)) =))
[redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.
User avatar
OZZIE4DUKE
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 14464
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:43 pm
Location: Home! Watching carolina Go To Hell! :9f:

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by OZZIE4DUKE » October 18th, 2010, 11:35 pm

RnVjaw== 01000110 01110101 01100011 01101011 46 75 63 6b 70 117 99 107
I was going to post that in the AL Playoffs thread on another site, but with 3 points already I didn't want to to get into more trouble. They just don't have a sense of humor...
Your paradigm of optimism

:9f: :9f: Go To Hell carolina! Go To Hell! :9f: :9f:
9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F!

http://ecogreen.greentechaffiliate.com
User avatar
devildeac
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 18965
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 11:10 pm
Location: Nowhere near the hell in which unc finds itself.

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by devildeac » October 19th, 2010, 7:44 am

OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
RnVjaw== 01000110 01110101 01100011 01101011 46 75 63 6b 70 117 99 107
I was going to post that in the AL Playoffs thread on another site, but with 3 points already I didn't want to to get into more trouble. They just don't have a sense of humor...
Aww, go ahead. What's another 3 points or a day in "time-out?" :)) =))
[redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.
User avatar
DukieInKansas
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 6611
Joined: May 3rd, 2009, 11:48 pm
Location: Kansas - scientist's say it's flatter than a pancake - cross it on a bicycle and you won't agree.

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by DukieInKansas » October 19th, 2010, 10:42 am

devildeac wrote:
DukieInKansas wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote: quote="DukieInKansas" I received another box at the office today. Six bottles of a 2005 Benning Hill cabernet that received wonderful reviews. I like unexpected presents like these. /quote


Random unexplained gifts? Interesting, very interesting...
There is actually an explanation - I'm doing some things for my brother and this is a thank you gift. The result is that I have some nice wine to enjoy. I see a party in my future.
And 20-30 of us at CTN see a road trip in our future. :)) =))
Come on over. I'd love to see everyone.
Life is good!
User avatar
colchar
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4120
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:12 pm
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Re: LTE 2.0

Post by colchar » October 19th, 2010, 12:15 pm

ArkieDukie wrote:
colchar wrote:I think the networks also had a major bidding war for this show when it was first conceived and the high cost paid for it was also factored into the per episode cost which, when added to the salaries, made the cost even higher.

Personally, I am pissed that A) they dumped J.J. (A.J. Cook) from Criminal Minds and seem to be squeezing Prentice (Paget Brewster) out a bit as she has been forced to accept a reduced role while all of this seems geared toward saving money on the original and putting it into the spinoff; B) that they got rid of the original Law & order in favour of the cheaper Law & Order: Los Angeles spinoff and have yet to cancel the abysmal Law & Order: Criminal Intent - if they had wanted to save money they should've canceled that one; and C) that Raising the Bar was canceled as I was really enjoying that show.

And yet, they continue to feed people an unending diet of crappy reality shows simply because they are cheaper to produce. If only people would refuse to be sucked in and stop watching them, maybe we could get some decent shows back on TV. I won't hold my breath though.
Colchar, I think we must have similar taste in television shows. The firing of A.J. Cook was disgraceful, as is the diminshed role of Paget Brewster. Especially when this is juxtaposed with the ridiculously high salary that Charlie Sheen is being paid. And I refuse to watch any of the reality TV shows.

I'm not so concerned about Sheen's salary as his show has consistently been one of the highest ranked comedies on television. What bugs me is that the network got rid of A.J. and is marginalizing Paget simply as a cost cutting measure. They are trying to cut costs on the original while putting out a spin-off that I don't think is going to be anywhere near as good. Despite the high salary that Whittaker will command for that show, the rest of the actors won't make much so they will be saving money. But that spin-off won't last long so they are kind of shooting themselves in the foot and are screwing up the entire franchise in the process. Criminal Minds is a great show but I am convinced they are going to screw it up entirely. I'm also hoping they don't bring back any 'super criminals who cannot be stopped' storylines (like the one involving Gideon and the other one about the guy who killed Hotch's ex-wife) as I find them to be ridiculously stupid. Personally, I think those storylines detract from an otherwise well written show.

They canned the more expensive original Law & Order in favour of the L.A. based one that is nowhere near as good (and that I don't think will last more than a season or two). To me, this was done as a cost cutting measure but, in doing so, they have messed up the franchise. I can see Criminal Minds heading down the exact same path.
". . . when a man is tired of London, he is tired of life; for there is in London all that life can afford."
— Samuel Johnson

----------

2010 & 2012 CTN NASCAR Fantasy League Champion. No lemurs were harmed in the winning of these titles.

----------
Post Reply