VT 74, UNC 70

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 5:05 pm

devildeac wrote:My only fear is that the 'holes got the game next Wed. boldly circled on their sked and will prolly play their game o' the year against us. It's their redemption game.

Redemption don't mean squat if Roy isn't wearing his lucky ties.

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 5:07 pm

Jesus_hurley wrote:'Holes lose. Player of the game John Henson doesn't get off the bench in the last 6 minutes. Ginyard sucks. IC melts down. Life is good

How much of a meltdown ay IC?

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 6:00 pm

Lavabe wrote:
Jesus_hurley wrote:'Holes lose. Player of the game John Henson doesn't get off the bench in the last 6 minutes. Ginyard sucks. IC melts down. Life is good
How much of a meltdown ay IC?

That should read "How much of a meltdown at IC?"

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 6:02 pm

The Holes losses are one of today's PTI closing discussion topics.

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 6:05 pm

devildeac wrote:and hansblow ain't traveling through the door either

I wonder if this is having an economic impact among the businesses along Franklin St.

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 6:10 pm

I suspect that someone is going to make a designer change to this year's hole uni's.
That's the biggest reason why they're losing. ;)

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 6:30 pm

devildeac wrote:we want D'oh

Where's EarlJam's photo of D'oh?

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 6:35 pm

It's times like these when Roy turns to Coca-Cola, just like he did when he was a little boy, when his mom would give him a dime to get out of the Coke machine, and ...

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 6:37 pm

Given how the Holes performed against VT, I have but one question:

WHY did the Wolfies lose to the Holes?

Lavabe · Post by **Lavabe** » February 5th, 2010, 6:41 pm

devildeac wrote:BWAHAHAHAHA

I am convinced that the woman at that dinner party you went to (the hole fan with the sweater) has cursed the holes this season. Karma happens.

CameronBornAndBred · Post by **CameronBornAndBred** » February 5th, 2010, 6:50 pm

Lavabe wrote:
Jesus_hurley wrote:'Holes lose. Player of the game John Henson doesn't get off the bench in the last 6 minutes. Ginyard sucks. IC melts down. Life is good
How much of a meltdown at IC?

It's probably a smoldering crater by now.

Jesus_hurley · Post by **Jesus_hurley** » February 5th, 2010, 7:47 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote:
Lavabe wrote:
Jesus_hurley wrote:'Holes lose. Player of the game John Henson doesn't get off the bench in the last 6 minutes. Ginyard sucks. IC melts down. Life is good
How much of a meltdown at IC?
It's probably a smoldering crater by now.

Roy can't coach, mcdonald is going to transfer, henson's going to fast THEN transfer, bullock and barnes are going to rescind their loi's. That pretty much covers the first two pages of threads

what really amuses me is that up to the beginning of the year they had the 'all time win' thread stickied to the top. Then they started losing and uk and ku kept winning

Jesus_hurley · Post by **Jesus_hurley** » February 5th, 2010, 7:50 pm

GTHC!!!

EarlJam · Post by **EarlJam** » February 5th, 2010, 9:01 pm

I will admit, and this WILL be unpopular, that I am a bit disturbed over the fact that "Carolina losing" threads are kicking "Duke winning" threads asses here. Look at the Duke/GT thread, then look at this one.

Hey, I celebrate Carolina losses like anyone else, but methinks we are acting a bit like Maryland fans circa 2000.

-EarlJam

P.S. Not meaning to knock these types of threads. I love them. And I will contribute accordingly. It's just the ratio difference between "anti-UNC" to "pro-Duke." Am I wrong?

Devil in the Blue Dress · Post by **Devil in the Blue Dress** » February 5th, 2010, 9:49 pm

EarlJam wrote:I will admit, and this WILL be unpopular, that I am a bit disturbed over the fact that "Carolina losing" threads are kicking "Duke winning" threads asses here. Look at the Duke/GT thread, then look at this one.

Hey, I celebrate Carolina losses like anyone else, but methinks we are acting a bit like Maryland fans circa 2000.

-EarlJam

P.S. Not meaning to knock these types of threads. I love them. And I will contribute accordingly. It's just the ratio difference between "anti-UNC" to "pro-Duke." Am I wrong?

Perhaps this unbalanced ratio is bad karma.

Jesus_hurley · Post by **Jesus_hurley** » February 6th, 2010, 12:16 am

EarlJam wrote:I will admit, and this WILL be unpopular, that I am a bit disturbed over the fact that "Carolina losing" threads are kicking "Duke winning" threads asses here. Look at the Duke/GT thread, then look at this one.

Hey, I celebrate Carolina losses like anyone else, but methinks we are acting a bit like Maryland fans circa 2000.

-EarlJam

P.S. Not meaning to knock these types of threads. I love them. And I will contribute accordingly. It's just the ratio difference between "anti-UNC" to "pro-Duke." Am I wrong?

It's hard to encompass the train wreck that is UNC-CH basketball this season in just one thread.....

devildeac · Post by **devildeac** » February 6th, 2010, 8:06 am

Jesus_hurley wrote:
EarlJam wrote:I will admit, and this WILL be unpopular, that I am a bit disturbed over the fact that "Carolina losing" threads are kicking "Duke winning" threads asses here. Look at the Duke/GT thread, then look at this one.

Hey, I celebrate Carolina losses like anyone else, but methinks we are acting a bit like Maryland fans circa 2000.

-EarlJam

P.S. Not meaning to knock these types of threads. I love them. And I will contribute accordingly. It's just the ratio difference between "anti-UNC" to "pro-Duke." Am I wrong?
It's hard to encompass the train wreck that is UNC-CH basketball this season in just one thread.....

I'd still like to see a few more box cars and flat cars mangled by the side of the tracks...

VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70

Re: VT 74, UNC 70