Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Anything goes, all topics welcome!

Moderator: CameronBornAndBred

User avatar
Bostondevil
Graduate Student at PWing school
Graduate Student at PWing school
Posts: 1491
Joined: April 9th, 2009, 9:43 am
Location: Massachusetts, duh.

Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by Bostondevil » March 17th, 2011, 12:38 pm

The DBR just closed the Grant Hill response discussion thread. I'm not sure why. Killjoys.
The time is out of joint, O cursed spite!
User avatar
CathyCA
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 11483
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 9:38 pm
Location: Greenville, North Carolina

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by CathyCA » March 17th, 2011, 12:44 pm

Ad ingenium faciendum.

Toward the building of character. You all already knew that, didn't you?

:9f:
“The invention of basketball was not an accident. It was developed to meet a need. Those boys simply would not play 'Drop the Handkerchief.'”

~ James Naismith
User avatar
colchar
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4120
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:12 pm
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by colchar » March 17th, 2011, 12:56 pm

Bostondevil wrote:The DBR just closed the Grant Hill response discussion thread. I'm not sure why. Killjoys.

Because they're twats?
". . . when a man is tired of London, he is tired of life; for there is in London all that life can afford."
— Samuel Johnson

----------

2010 & 2012 CTN NASCAR Fantasy League Champion. No lemurs were harmed in the winning of these titles.

----------
User avatar
Lavabe
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 11122
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 8:02 pm
Location: Land of the Lost, Kentucky (pining for the fjords of Madagascar)

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by Lavabe » March 17th, 2011, 1:06 pm

colchar wrote:
Bostondevil wrote:The DBR just closed the Grant Hill response discussion thread. I'm not sure why. Killjoys.

Because they're twats?
Because it was distracting from the John Wall thread. ;;)
2014, 2011, and 2009 Lemur Loving CTN NASCAR Champ. No lasers were used to win these titles.
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 16141
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by CameronBornAndBred » March 17th, 2011, 1:22 pm

:-$ :-$
Nothing wrong with a GH response thread, as long as that's what it is. If it's an OY bashing thread... :Boo: .
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
User avatar
captmojo
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5096
Joined: April 12th, 2009, 12:20 pm
Location: It's lonely out in space on such a timeless flight.

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by captmojo » March 17th, 2011, 1:54 pm

Lavabe wrote:
colchar wrote:
Bostondevil wrote:The DBR just closed the Grant Hill response discussion thread. I'm not sure why. Killjoys.

Because they're twats?
Because it was distracting from the John Wall thread. ;;)
=)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =))
Beware.jpg
Beware.jpg (9.7 KiB) Viewed 544 times
"Backboards? Backboards? I'll show'em what to do with a f%#kin' backboard!"
User avatar
colchar
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4120
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:12 pm
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by colchar » March 17th, 2011, 4:06 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote::-$ :-$
Nothing wrong with a GH response thread, as long as that's what it is. If it's an OY bashing thread... :Boo: .

Not a bash, merely an observation.
". . . when a man is tired of London, he is tired of life; for there is in London all that life can afford."
— Samuel Johnson

----------

2010 & 2012 CTN NASCAR Fantasy League Champion. No lemurs were harmed in the winning of these titles.

----------
Very Duke Blue
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 10893
Joined: August 25th, 2009, 9:36 pm
Location: Efland,NC

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by Very Duke Blue » March 17th, 2011, 5:50 pm

I love GH. :duke: :duke:
User avatar
DevilAlumna
Graduate Student at PWing school
Graduate Student at PWing school
Posts: 1300
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 12:13 am
Location: Woodinville, Wa

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by DevilAlumna » March 18th, 2011, 1:20 am

Very Duke Blue wrote:I love GH. :duke: :duke:
Seconded.

WRT his response, I liked the NYTimes-edited version better -- it was a bit more concise, and removed a little snideness, thus making Grant's high road all the higher.
User avatar
windsor
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4168
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 9:30 pm
Location: Hurricane Alley

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by windsor » March 18th, 2011, 8:31 am

Grant is right. Jalen is wrong.

No discussion needed.

:happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost; the old that is strong does not wither, deep roots are not reached by the frost.
User avatar
EarlJam
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3235
Joined: April 9th, 2009, 2:58 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by EarlJam » March 18th, 2011, 11:26 am

colchar wrote:
Bostondevil wrote:The DBR just closed the Grant Hill response discussion thread. I'm not sure why. Killjoys.

Because they're twats?
=)) :ymapplause: :ymapplause: =)) :happy-bouncyblue:

-EarlJam
Your mama wears combat boots to bed.
User avatar
Lavabe
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 11122
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 8:02 pm
Location: Land of the Lost, Kentucky (pining for the fjords of Madagascar)

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by Lavabe » March 18th, 2011, 6:27 pm

windsor wrote:Grant is right. Jalen is wrong.

No discussion needed.

:happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
Grant is right... Sprite tastes great!! :D :D
2014, 2011, and 2009 Lemur Loving CTN NASCAR Champ. No lasers were used to win these titles.
User avatar
captmojo
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5096
Joined: April 12th, 2009, 12:20 pm
Location: It's lonely out in space on such a timeless flight.

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by captmojo » March 18th, 2011, 7:42 pm

Lavabe wrote: Grant is right... Sprite tastes great!! :D :D
And, I am right when I say that the taste of Sprite is greatly enhanced by the presence of a shot of bourbon within.
"Backboards? Backboards? I'll show'em what to do with a f%#kin' backboard!"
User avatar
OZZIE4DUKE
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 14462
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:43 pm
Location: Home! Watching carolina Go To Hell! :9f:

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by OZZIE4DUKE » March 18th, 2011, 9:22 pm

captmojo wrote:
Lavabe wrote: Grant is right... Sprite tastes great!! :D :D
And, I am right when I say that the taste of Sprite is greatly enhanced by the presence of a shot of bourbon within.
Within the Sprite or within the captmojo?
Your paradigm of optimism

:9f: :9f: Go To Hell carolina! Go To Hell! :9f: :9f:
9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F! 9F!

http://ecogreen.greentechaffiliate.com
User avatar
wilson
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4683
Joined: April 28th, 2009, 4:33 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by wilson » March 18th, 2011, 9:32 pm

captmojo wrote:...the taste of Sprite is greatly enhanced by the presence of a shot of bourbon within.
Sounds like a great way to fuck up your bourbon to me.
Image
User avatar
colchar
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4120
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:12 pm
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by colchar » March 18th, 2011, 11:27 pm

OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
captmojo wrote:
Lavabe wrote: Grant is right... Sprite tastes great!! :D :D
And, I am right when I say that the taste of Sprite is greatly enhanced by the presence of a shot of bourbon within.
Within the Sprite or within the captmojo?

Either way, they end up in the same place.
". . . when a man is tired of London, he is tired of life; for there is in London all that life can afford."
— Samuel Johnson

----------

2010 & 2012 CTN NASCAR Fantasy League Champion. No lemurs were harmed in the winning of these titles.

----------
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 16141
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by CameronBornAndBred » March 18th, 2011, 11:29 pm

colchar wrote:
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
captmojo wrote:And, I am right when I say that the taste of Sprite is greatly enhanced by the presence of a shot of bourbon within.
Within the Sprite or within the captmojo?

Either way, they end up in the same place.
=)) =)) =))
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
User avatar
Ima Facultiwyfe
PWing School Professor
Posts: 4270
Joined: April 9th, 2009, 11:33 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by Ima Facultiwyfe » March 21st, 2011, 12:19 am

CathyCA wrote:Ad ingenium faciendum.

Toward the building of character. You all already knew that, didn't you?

:9f:
Uh. No. :|
Love, Ima
"We will never NEVER go away." -- D. Cutcliffe
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 16141
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by CameronBornAndBred » March 21st, 2011, 1:12 am

Ima Facultiwyfe wrote:
CathyCA wrote:Ad ingenium faciendum.

Toward the building of character. You all already knew that, didn't you?

:9f:
Uh. No. :|
Love, Ima
You two are going to make me blind. :-B
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
User avatar
CathyCA
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 11483
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 9:38 pm
Location: Greenville, North Carolina

Re: Do we need a Grant Hill response discussion thread here?

Post by CathyCA » March 21st, 2011, 7:41 am

CameronBornAndBred wrote:
Ima Facultiwyfe wrote:
CathyCA wrote:Ad ingenium faciendum.

Toward the building of character. You all already knew that, didn't you?

:9f:
Uh. No. :|
Love, Ima
You two are going to make me blind. :-B
Hit "Control +" and you can see it better. :-B

:9f:
“The invention of basketball was not an accident. It was developed to meet a need. Those boys simply would not play 'Drop the Handkerchief.'”

~ James Naismith
Post Reply