Page 1 of 1
Cheaters still might go to Hell
Posted: December 21st, 2016, 10:40 am
by CameronBornAndBred
A new NOA, which
may bring the football and basketball teams back in to the fold.
This new notice - the third notice of allegations in the case - could be announced as soon as this week.
Sources confirm this new version reinstates aspects of the original first notice that were then altered for the amended notice. That amended notice, which was released on April 25, replaced the impermissible benefits allegation with a failure to monitor academic support charge and removed all references to the men’s basketball and football programs.
http://www.scout.com/college/north-caro ... c-new-anoa
Re: Cheaters still might go to Hell
Posted: December 21st, 2016, 11:07 am
by DukieInKansas
Groundhog Day!
Re: Cheaters still might go to Hell
Posted: December 21st, 2016, 3:38 pm
by devildeac
Re: Cheaters still might go to Hell
Posted: December 21st, 2016, 3:56 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
Re: Cheaters still might go to Hell
Posted: December 21st, 2016, 7:14 pm
by Lavabe
They already have more NOAs than Helms Titles.
Re: Cheaters still might go to Hell
Posted: December 22nd, 2016, 3:32 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
Something to bring back your smile today.
It also restores a reference to football and men's basketball players using problem courses to help maintain eligibility, which was removed before the second version filed in April. UNC has faced five top-level charges in all three versions, including lack of institutional control, though a charge of failure to monitor from the second notice was incorporated within the institutional-control charge in the third notice.
http://www.wralsportsfan.com/unc-again- ... /16363327/
Re: Cheaters still might go to Hell
Posted: December 22nd, 2016, 9:16 pm
by YmoBeThere
Burn baby burn!
Re: Cheaters still might go to Hell
Posted: December 24th, 2016, 8:46 am
by ArkieDukie
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Something to bring back your smile today.
It also restores a reference to football and men's basketball players using problem courses to help maintain eligibility, which was removed before the second version filed in April. UNC has faced five top-level charges in all three versions, including lack of institutional control, though a charge of failure to monitor from the second notice was incorporated within the institutional-control charge in the third notice.
http://www.wralsportsfan.com/unc-again- ... /16363327/
This makes me feel much better. I still think that UNC's transgressions are far worse than some schools that have been punished recently, for more recent violations than unc's. To maintain any credibility at all, the NCAA needs to being the hammer down on them, hard, and it needs to be soon.
Re: Cheaters still might go to Hell
Posted: April 4th, 2017, 3:09 pm
by DevilWearsPrada2.0
GTHC
