Duke @ Stanford Game Discussion

Anything goes, all topics welcome!

Moderator: CameronBornAndBred

Post Reply
User avatar
Bob Green
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 6799
Joined: August 29th, 2009, 5:28 am
Location: Norfolk, VA

Duke @ Stanford Game Discussion

Post by Bob Green » September 4th, 2012, 6:16 am

CBS Sports has their rankings updated:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...ngs/124/index2

Stanford fell from 21 to 33, while Duke improved from 103 to 89. The ridiculousness of rankings is illustrated by FIU still being 22 spots above Duke at 67. What???
User avatar
Bob Green
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 6799
Joined: August 29th, 2009, 5:28 am
Location: Norfolk, VA

Re: Duke @ Stanford Game Discussion

Post by Bob Green » September 5th, 2012, 7:22 pm

Here is a link to an article in the San Francisco Gate:

http://www.sfgate.com/collegesports/...es-3839976.php
This was not the same Cardinal offensive line that could impose its will on defensive fronts over the past few years.
This week is going to be a huge, huge test for our defensive line. The Stanford O-line will be bigger and stronger than we faced against FIU; however, Stanford doesn't have a running back as talented as Kedrick Rhodes so hopefully our defense can be physical and force the Cardinal to throw the ball.
User avatar
captmojo
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 5096
Joined: April 12th, 2009, 12:20 pm
Location: It's lonely out in space on such a timeless flight.

Re: Duke @ Stanford Game Discussion

Post by captmojo » September 8th, 2012, 4:22 pm

Stating the obvious....
Stanford will have no Luck. ;)
"Backboards? Backboards? I'll show'em what to do with a f%#kin' backboard!"
Devil in the Blue Dress
Graduate Student at PWing school
Graduate Student at PWing school
Posts: 1832
Joined: July 7th, 2009, 10:18 pm
Location: Dancin' in the streets

Re: Duke @ Stanford Game Discussion

Post by Devil in the Blue Dress » September 8th, 2012, 5:53 pm

captmojo wrote:Stating the obvious....
Stanford will have no Luck. ;)
That's worthy of a few sporks! :happy-bouncyblue:
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 15945
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: Duke @ Stanford Game Discussion

Post by CameronBornAndBred » September 10th, 2012, 12:38 pm

With fifth-year senior and three-year starter Sean Renfree under center, and one of the ACC’s most prolific receivers in conference history, Conner Vernon, in the fold, the passing attack figured to be one of Duke’s strengths. But the Blue Devils seemed reluctant to attempt anything other than a swing pass to either the right or left flat in the first half against Stanford, trying the move 13 times. Only two of those went for more than five yards, as the Cardinal linebackers quickly figured out the game plan and used their speed to swarm the receiver as soon as he caught the ball.
Aaaaaaaaargghhh!!!!!!!!!!! X(
Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/09/09/ ... rylink=cpy
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
User avatar
Bob Green
PWing School Endowed Professor
Posts: 6799
Joined: August 29th, 2009, 5:28 am
Location: Norfolk, VA

Re: Duke @ Stanford Game Discussion

Post by Bob Green » September 10th, 2012, 7:37 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote:
With fifth-year senior and three-year starter Sean Renfree under center, and one of the ACC’s most prolific receivers in conference history, Conner Vernon, in the fold, the passing attack figured to be one of Duke’s strengths. But the Blue Devils seemed reluctant to attempt anything other than a swing pass to either the right or left flat in the first half against Stanford, trying the move 13 times. Only two of those went for more than five yards, as the Cardinal linebackers quickly figured out the game plan and used their speed to swarm the receiver as soon as he caught the ball.
Aaaaaaaaargghhh!!!!!!!!!!! X(
Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/09/09/ ... rylink=cpy
Double Aaaaaaaaargghhh!!!!!!!!!!! X( X(

I really, really, truly desire to see the offense throw mid-range passes. Receivers catching the ball 8-12 yards past the line of scrimmage would be nice. Throwing a 3 yard pass to a running back in the flat on 3rd and 9 is infuriating.
User avatar
devildeac
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 18871
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 11:10 pm
Location: Nowhere near the hell in which unc finds itself.

Re: Duke @ Stanford Game Discussion

Post by devildeac » September 11th, 2012, 9:49 am

Bob Green wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
With fifth-year senior and three-year starter Sean Renfree under center, and one of the ACC’s most prolific receivers in conference history, Conner Vernon, in the fold, the passing attack figured to be one of Duke’s strengths. But the Blue Devils seemed reluctant to attempt anything other than a swing pass to either the right or left flat in the first half against Stanford, trying the move 13 times. Only two of those went for more than five yards, as the Cardinal linebackers quickly figured out the game plan and used their speed to swarm the receiver as soon as he caught the ball.
Aaaaaaaaargghhh!!!!!!!!!!! X(
Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/09/09/ ... rylink=cpy
Double Aaaaaaaaargghhh!!!!!!!!!!! X( X(

I really, really, truly desire to see the offense throw mid-range passes. Receivers catching the ball 8-12 yards past the line of scrimmage would be nice. Throwing a 3 yard pass to a running back in the flat on 3rd and 9 is infuriating.
IIRC, we had 2 leading rushers for the game, each with 9 yards. WTH?
[redacted] them and the horses they rode in on.
Post Reply