crazietalk.net

So, they were talking about this on the radio this morning. For the ladies (or guys if you're so inclined), which celebrity dad would YOU most like to see in his underwear? According to a poll by Jockey, it was these five. So pick your favorite of these five, but if you have one in mind you'd rather see MORE, add him in a post.

I personally don't get Obama. I have nothing against the guy, but I don't think he's even in the same league with the others on the list in terms of looks/body. He'd definitely be up there for PRESIDENTS, but not top 5 for all celebrity dads. I also don't get Michelle Obama in the Maxim Hot 100. I mean, she's not a bad looking woman, but I can think of a LOT of women that would rank above her for hotness in my book.

http://entertainment.oneindia.in/hollyw ... 60609.html

I'll vote for my wife's choice, which I'm soliciting as I type this.

What, no Marky Mark? He looked pretty fly in his Calvin's....

DevilAlumna wrote:What, no Marky Mark? He looked pretty fly in his Calvin's....

Well, seeing as how it's not 1991 anymore...

My wife went with Will Smith by default cause she's not into the others, and doesn't even know who Hugh Jackman is. She picked Josh Lucas, despite the fact that he's still single. He says he's tired of being single and WANTS to get married and have kids. Her second pick was Brendan Fraser, who has three boys.

wilson wrote:

DevilAlumna wrote:What, no Marky Mark? He looked pretty fly in his Calvin's....

Well, seeing as how it's not 1991 anymore...

I bet he still looks pretty darned good.

Come on, DA, play along and VOTE! ;)

bjornolf wrote:
I personally don't get Obama. He'd definitely be up there for PRESIDENTS

Far too many women have seen Bill Clinton in, or out of, his underwear.

How long do they have to be in their underwear?

I vote for Abraham Lincoln, but to paraphrase Joe Cocker, he can leave the stovepipe on.

weezie wrote:How long do they have to be in their underwear?

How fast do you want him to drop them?

I thought this was a pole for the ladies only. Why are all of you guys chiming in?

Why isn't there an option for "all of the above?"

Cause we all secretly have a man crush on some of these guys. ;) Plus, we're post whores and you ladies are ignoring the poll.

bjornolf wrote:Cause we all secretly have a man crush on some of these guys. ;) Plus, we're post whores and you ladies are ignoring the poll.

I don't have a man crush on any of those guys (or anyone else, for that matter). I'm just making smart ass remarks!

Dude, I was trying to be funny. What do you think the ;) was for? Nobody gets my humor anymore. My emoticons aren't just funny little button presses and throw aways. They're important parts of my narrative most of the time. I choose them VERY carefully. Yes, I'm a :geek: .

bjornolf wrote:Dude, I was trying to be funny. What do you think the ;) was for? Nobody gets my humor anymore. My emoticons aren't just funny little button presses and throw aways. They're important parts of my narrative most of the time. I choose them VERY carefully. Yes, I'm a :geek: .

I knew you were ;) ing, but I was really answering CathyCA's question as to why a guy was posting in the thread. Several times ;)

I'm seriously surprised and bummed that more of the ladies haven't responded to this. Hey, guys out there, get your wives and/or girlfriends to tell you their vote and throw a vote up for them like I did. Let's boost the numbers a little!

Johnny. Depp. Underwear optional.

Now, Windsor, I know you love Captain Jack Sparrow, and I get that you want to write him in. I encourage that. But you're still supposed to vote for one of the five above. ;)

bjornolf wrote: Hey, guys out there, get your wives and/or girlfriends to tell you their vote and throw a vote up for them like I did.

What's with all the discrimination? ;)

What discrimination? I originally said that if guys really wanted to vote for themselves, they could. But only four people have voted, and one was me for my wife. I just want more numbers, man. ;)