crazietalk.net

This time, from Inside Carolina.

I posted nothing nasty.....nothing derogatory. Simply stated an opinion that some of their posts (and I made it clear it was the posts, not the posters), were being a bit hypocritical when it comes to the topic of running up the score on lesser opponents.

They blasted Duke, but it was fine for them to do it to St. Francis.

Interestingly enough, most of the responding posts were from their own carolina fans who were AGREEING with me.

Guess this was too much for them to handle/accept.

I got a message saying I am no longer welcome there. In short,

-EarlJam, Leader of the Banned

EarlJam wrote:This time, from Inside Carolina.

I posted nothing nasty.....nothing derogatory. Simply stated an opinion that some of their posts (and I made it clear it was the posts, not the posters), were being a bit hypocritical when it comes to the topic of running up the score on lesser opponents.

They blasted Duke, but it was fine for them to do it to St. Francis.

Interestingly enough, most of the responding posts were from their own carolina fans who were AGREEING with me.

Guess this was too much for them to handle/accept.

I got a message saying I am no longer welcome there. In short,

-EarlJam, Leader of the Banned

Well, you know how things sometimes occur in threes...

Send them a "red birdie* from our "view more smilies" page.

Congrats on being banned from IC!

EarlJam wrote:This time, from Inside Carolina.

I posted nothing nasty.....nothing derogatory. Simply stated an opinion that some of their posts (and I made it clear it was the posts, not the posters), were being a bit hypocritical when it comes to the topic of running up the score on lesser opponents.

They blasted Duke, but it was fine for them to do it to St. Francis.

Interestingly enough, most of the responding posts were from their own carolina fans who were AGREEING with me.

Guess this was too much for them to handle/accept.

I got a message saying I am no longer welcome there. In short,

-EarlJam, Leader of the Banned

What were you doing over at IC in the first place?

EarlJam wrote:This time, from Inside Carolina.

I posted nothing nasty.....nothing derogatory. Simply stated an opinion that some of their posts (and I made it clear it was the posts, not the posters), were being a bit hypocritical when it comes to the topic of running up the score on lesser opponents.

They blasted Duke, but it was fine for them to do it to St. Francis.

Interestingly enough, most of the responding posts were from their own carolina fans who were AGREEING with me.

Guess this was too much for them to handle/accept.

I got a message saying I am no longer welcome there. In short,

-EarlJam, Leader of the Banned

Well done sir! Well done!

CathyCA wrote:

EarlJam wrote:This time, from Inside Carolina.

I posted nothing nasty.....nothing derogatory. Simply stated an opinion that some of their posts (and I made it clear it was the posts, not the posters), were being a bit hypocritical when it comes to the topic of running up the score on lesser opponents.

They blasted Duke, but it was fine for them to do it to St. Francis.

Interestingly enough, most of the responding posts were from their own carolina fans who were AGREEING with me.

Guess this was too much for them to handle/accept.

I got a message saying I am no longer welcome there. In short,

-EarlJam, Leader of the Banned

What were you doing over at IC in the first place?

Yeah, that is the most important question here.

I wonder how long it would take him to get banned from a State board? And can he run the entire ACC?

I think "Got Banned from Inside Carolina message boards" belongs on your resume.

colchar wrote:

Yeah, that is the most important question here.

I wonder how long it would take him to get banned from a State board? And can he run the entire ACC?

This idea. Running the ACC on Bannishment. It's brilliant. Simply brilliant! It shall be done by tournament time. Oh yes. It shall be done!

Duke (DBR) and UNC (Inside Carolina) done. Now, there's work to do. Think the next two targets will be in-state (N.C. State and Wake Forest).

(insert maniacal laugh here)

-EarlJam

EarlJam wrote:

colchar wrote:

Yeah, that is the most important question here.

I wonder how long it would take him to get banned from a State board? And can he run the entire ACC?

This idea. Running the ACC on Bannishment. It's brilliant. Simply brilliant! It shall be done by tournament time. Oh yes. It shall be done!

Duke (DBR) and UNC (Inside Carolina) done. Now, there's work to do. Think the next two targets will be in-state (N.C. State and Wake Forest).

(insert maniacal laugh here)

-EarlJam

I would think getting banned from a/the Terp board would be more meaningful, not that they are our rival... ;)

EarlJam wrote:

colchar wrote:

Yeah, that is the most important question here.

I wonder how long it would take him to get banned from a State board? And can he run the entire ACC?

This idea. Running the ACC on Bannishment. It's brilliant. Simply brilliant! It shall be done by tournament time. Oh yes. It shall be done!

Duke (DBR) and UNC (Inside Carolina) done. Now, there's work to do. Think the next two targets will be in-state (N.C. State and Wake Forest).

(insert maniacal laugh here)

-EarlJam

One sort of subjective rule though: The bannishment must come because of the opinions stated in the post. In other words, no cheap bans such as posting a bunch of vulgar nonsense. That's too easy. Simple, honest (somewhat) posts that simply disagree strongly with the masses....mixed with a modicum of clean smart-assness that ultimately leads to being kicked out.

Could be fun.

-EarlJam

EarlJam wrote:

EarlJam wrote:

colchar wrote:

Yeah, that is the most important question here.

I wonder how long it would take him to get banned from a State board? And can he run the entire ACC?

This idea. Running the ACC on Bannishment. It's brilliant. Simply brilliant! It shall be done by tournament time. Oh yes. It shall be done!

Duke (DBR) and UNC (Inside Carolina) done. Now, there's work to do. Think the next two targets will be in-state (N.C. State and Wake Forest).

(insert maniacal laugh here)

-EarlJam

One sort of subjective rule though: The bannishment must come because of the opinions stated in the post. In other words, no cheap bans such as posting a bunch of vulgar nonsense. That's too easy. Simple, honest (somewhat) posts that simply disagree strongly with the masses....mixed with a modicum of clean smart-assness that ultimately leads to being kicked out.

Could be fun.

-EarlJam

Should we be doing an over/under on how long it takes you to get banned from each school's board?

I don't know about the rest of you, but it's goals like this one that make me glad I've got EarlJam in my life.

After reading EJ's sig, I know he's gonna get a lump of coal in his stocking next year.

Can we have some sort of thread OH with copies of your entries so we can follow you without frequenting their boards?

You go, big guy!
Love, Ima

Ima Facultiwyfe wrote:Can we have some sort of thread OH with copies of your entries so we can follow you without frequenting their boards?

You go, big guy!
Love, Ima

Yes. Indeed. It shall be so. Operation BasketBanned is officially underway.

-EarlJam

We don't want your quest to go without public support...so here.

http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Crazie ... 0893144629

Bostondevil wrote:I don't know about the rest of you, but it's goals like this one that make me glad I've got EarlJam in my life.

I second this!

I suggest you contact Klemmnop as to how to be banned from the Clemson board.