Ugh.
Posted: September 25th, 2010, 5:43 pm
Pah ----- theh ---- tick! Bless their hearts!
Love, Ima
Love, Ima
Amen, Ima. Pah.Ima Facultiwyfe wrote:Pah ----- theh ---- tick! Bless their hearts!
Love, Ima
My response OY:OZZIE4DUKE wrote:Today's game was nothing short of embarrassing. The offense, the quarterback and the play calling for 3 quarters was putrid. A definite step backwards for the program.
Where the hell were the students today? They didn't know in advance what the game was going to bring. Their section was noticeably not full, almost barren, at the beginning of the game. They can't use a 3 pm start at homecoming as an excuse. They were AWOL as was the offensive team.
I am not happy. Next play. Next game.
Allen, I think you've said it better than anyone else. I felt that Saturday we were seeing some guys with great potential who had been beaten down before they had a chance to grow into what they can be.allen wrote:I have been jokingly referring to the Alabama gameas the "What-Were-We-Thinking-Bowl"
I think it was a strategic error of epic proportions. This is a young and developing team. I understand the "to be the best you have to play the best" mentality. But to subject this team to a complete humiliation on national television was unwise. It seems as though their spirit has been broken.
I'm not picking on you, you've just given me the opportunity to bring up a point about the Alabama game. That game was scheduled long ago, before Cutcliffe got here. The only thing he and the administration did was to keep the game in Durham. The fact is that regardless of where that game was played, it would have still been on TV, Alabama would still have been #1, and had it been anywhere else they would have lost in front of an even larger crowd. The teams would have been the same in both instances.allen wrote:I have been jokingly referring to the Alabama gameas the "What-Were-We-Thinking-Bowl"
I think it was a strategic error of epic proportions. This is a young and developing team. I understand the "to be the best you have to play the best" mentality. But to subject this team to a complete humiliation on national television was unwise. It seems as though their spirit has been broken.
CameronBornAndBred wrote:I'm not picking on you, you've just given me the opportunity to bring up a point about the Alabama game. That game was scheduled long ago, before Cutcliffe got here. The only thing he and the administration did was to keep the game in Durham. The fact is that regardless of where that game was played, it would have still been on TV, Alabama would still have been #1, and had it been anywhere else they would have lost in front of an even larger crowd. The teams would have been the same in both instances.allen wrote:I have been jokingly referring to the Alabama gameas the "What-Were-We-Thinking-Bowl"
I think it was a strategic error of epic proportions. This is a young and developing team. I understand the "to be the best you have to play the best" mentality. But to subject this team to a complete humiliation on national television was unwise. It seems as though their spirit has been broken.
Word.CameronBornAndBred wrote:I'm not picking on you, you've just given me the opportunity to bring up a point about the Alabama game. That game was scheduled long ago, before Cutcliffe got here. The only thing he and the administration did was to keep the game in Durham. The fact is that regardless of where that game was played, it would have still been on TV, Alabama would still have been #1, and had it been anywhere else they would have lost in front of an even larger crowd. The teams would have been the same in both instances.allen wrote:I have been jokingly referring to the Alabama gameas the "What-Were-We-Thinking-Bowl"
I think it was a strategic error of epic proportions. This is a young and developing team. I understand the "to be the best you have to play the best" mentality. But to subject this team to a complete humiliation on national television was unwise. It seems as though their spirit has been broken.
Yes. And, yes to the rest of your post!TNTDevil wrote: Does anyone remember that, when we played at Alabama, we held them to nine points through three quarters?
Actually, I disagree with your assessment of the defense. Well, for the most part, anyway. The run defense spent most of the day bending but not breaking, which is how you defend the option offense (unless you stop it cold, which takes way more talent and experience than we currently have). Obviously the long pass plays were killers, and Cutcliffe took the blame for those as playing the run too aggressively. But you've got to appreciate the job done by the defense. The experience will come in real handy when we play Navy and GTech later in the season.devildeac wrote:My response OY:OZZIE4DUKE wrote:Today's game was nothing short of embarrassing. The offense, the quarterback and the play calling for 3 quarters was putrid. A definite step backwards for the program.
Where the hell were the students today? They didn't know in advance what the game was going to bring. Their section was noticeably not full, almost barren, at the beginning of the game. They can't use a 3 pm start at homecoming as an excuse. They were AWOL as was the offensive team.
I am not happy. Next play. Next game.
You forgot to include the _efense that really didn't show up today either. ~250 yds rushing, 2 TD to WIDE open Army receivers, 8/17 third down conversions, 0 TO, 40 minutes of possession by the Cadets and serious difficulties tackling.
Hell, I might as well get another post out of it at least.