Page 1 of 2

Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 2nd, 2010, 8:01 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
Thanks to Lawgrad91 for a job well done...luckily she didn't have to get out of her La-Z-Boy. She has chosen Bjornolf to take her green jacket. Lawgrad91 will be around for a bit longer as the two new mods get used to their chairs. :happy-bouncyblue:

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 2nd, 2010, 8:12 pm
by CathyCA
Thanks, Dawn! Congratulations, Joe!

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 2nd, 2010, 8:13 pm
by devildeac
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Thanks to Lawgrad91 for a job well done...luckily she didn't have to get out of her La-Z-Boy. She has chosen Bjornolf to take her green jacket. Lawgrad91 will be around for a bit longer as the two new mods get used to their chairs. :happy-bouncyblue:
:clap: An excellent choice. I'll bet he starts to PW a bit more now that he is required to read every word (or groups of letters that are supposed to be/resemble words) that that is posted here :D . I know I did. =))

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 2nd, 2010, 8:54 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
devildeac wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Thanks to Lawgrad91 for a job well done...luckily she didn't have to get out of her La-Z-Boy. She has chosen Bjornolf to take her green jacket. Lawgrad91 will be around for a bit longer as the two new mods get used to their chairs. :happy-bouncyblue:
:clap: An excellent choice. I'll bet he starts to PW a bit more now that he is required to read every word (or groups of letters that are supposed to be/resemble words) that that is posted here :D . I know I did. =))
Thanks LG, congrats Bjornolf. Glad it worked out so well, and fast for you!

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 2nd, 2010, 9:09 pm
by lawgrad91
Thank you to all those who made my job so easy, and also to EarlJam. :D (just kidding, EJ :ymhug: )

Congratulations Bjornolf!

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 2nd, 2010, 9:18 pm
by captmojo
Thanks to Lawgrad.
Bjorn, ya get what'cha ask for 'round these parts. We know you'll perform in superb fashion.

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 2nd, 2010, 9:44 pm
by CathyCA
lawgrad91 wrote:Thank you to all those who made my job so easy, and also to EarlJam. :D (just kidding, EJ :ymhug: )

Congratulations Bjornolf!
=)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =))

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 2nd, 2010, 9:54 pm
by colchar
So we've got two newbies we can screw with now? Awesome!

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 6:42 am
by bjornolf
captmojo wrote:Thanks to Lawgrad.
Bjorn, ya get what'cha ask for 'round these parts. We know you'll perform in superb fashion.
Oh, crap, why did I open my big mouth! :((

@};-

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 6:51 am
by bjornolf
colchar wrote:So we've got two newbies we can screw with now? Awesome!
And watch it, Canuck. Now I can screw with YOU. :banned: I've always wanted to use that emoticon. ;)

Speaking of which, has anyone noticed we have some TRULY offensive little guys? :obscene-sexualbutt: :obscene-sexualdoggy: :obscene-sexualvlick: I just noticed these the other day. Should we get rid of these? I can't really imagine an instance where someone could use them without offending SOMEBODY. There's a contest! Can anybody think of a way to use these non-offensively? The only way I could think for the first two would be if somebody were getting screwed over at work, like say, "I usually want somebody to buy me dinner before doing THAT to me."

@};-

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 6:57 am
by CathyCA
bjornolf wrote:
colchar wrote:So we've got two newbies we can screw with now? Awesome!
And watch it, Canuck. Now I can screw with YOU. :banned: I've always wanted to use that emoticon. ;)

Speaking of which, has anyone noticed we have some TRULY offensive little guys? :obscene-sexualbutt: :obscene-sexualdoggy: :obscene-sexualvlick: I just noticed these the other day. Should we get rid of these? I can't really imagine an instance where someone could use them without offending SOMEBODY. There's a contest! Can anybody think of a way to use these non-offensively? The only way I could think for the first two would be if somebody were getting screwed over at work, like say, "I usually want somebody to buy me dinner before doing THAT to me."

@};-
Oh.my.

I wasn't offended by them because I didn't know what they represented. Then I ran my cursor over them and I saw their names. Oh.my.

:naughty:

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 7:02 am
by bjornolf
CathyCA wrote: Oh.my.

I wasn't offended by them because I didn't know what they represented. Then I ran my cursor over them and I saw their names. Oh.my.

:naughty:
Is it sad that I knew what they meant the second I saw them? I guess I still have the mind of an adolescent. Either that, or hanging out with my kids all day has cause my emotional age to drop to the average of mine and theirs.

See that, I knew I was gonna cause controversy the second I got my jacket! =((

@};-

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 7:11 am
by captmojo
bjornolf wrote:
CathyCA wrote: Oh.my.

I wasn't offended by them because I didn't know what they represented. Then I ran my cursor over them and I saw their names. Oh.my.

:naughty:
Is it sad that I knew what they meant the second I saw them? I guess I still have the mind of an adolescent. Either that, or hanging out with my kids all day has cause my emotional age to drop to the average of mine and theirs.

See that, I knew I was gonna cause controversy the second I got my jacket! =((

@};-
The last one can be used any time there might be a mention of Ted Neugent. He used to reference that type of activity quite frquently.
It's not sad that you knew their meanings. Could it be possible the actions any of them represent might be responsible to leading you to have those beautiful kids you have? Could it be possible those same actions have resulted in the rest of us existing on this planet?

To quote Mr. Chuck Berry: "If it weren't for togetherness, none of us would be here." :D

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 7:22 am
by ArkieDukie
bjornolf wrote:
colchar wrote:So we've got two newbies we can screw with now? Awesome!
And watch it, Canuck. Now I can screw with YOU. :banned: I've always wanted to use that emoticon. ;)

Speaking of which, has anyone noticed we have some TRULY offensive little guys? :obscene-sexualbutt: :obscene-sexualdoggy: :obscene-sexualvlick: I just noticed these the other day. Should we get rid of these? I can't really imagine an instance where someone could use them without offending SOMEBODY. There's a contest! Can anybody think of a way to use these non-offensively? The only way I could think for the first two would be if somebody were getting screwed over at work, like say, "I usually want somebody to buy me dinner before doing THAT to me."

@};-
Hey! I think a moderator needs to look at this post! :-o ;)

Congrats on your new job, bjornolf!

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 9:12 am
by devildeac
bjornolf wrote:
colchar wrote:So we've got two newbies we can screw with now? Awesome!
And watch it, Canuck. Now I can screw with YOU. :banned: I've always wanted to use that emoticon. ;)

Speaking of which, has anyone noticed we have some TRULY offensive little guys? :obscene-sexualbutt: :obscene-sexualdoggy: :obscene-sexualvlick: I just noticed these the other day. Should we get rid of these? I can't really imagine an instance where someone could use them without offending SOMEBODY. There's a contest! Can anybody think of a way to use these non-offensively? The only way I could think for the first two would be if somebody were getting screwed over at work, like say, "I usually want somebody to buy me dinner before doing THAT to me."

@};-
Refs 2004 NCAA semi-final game vs u-convicts.

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 9:55 am
by Miles
:obscene-sexualbutt:
This is obviously a scene from "There Will Be Blood". That's Daniel Plainview jumping up and down behind his son and that's oil spewing from the earth.

:obscene-sexualdoggy:
Poor guy in the front is choking and the guy in the back is giving the Heimlich maneuver. Looks exhausting.

:obscene-sexualvlick:
This guy has a goiter. And for some reason, it inspires him to yodle.

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 10:01 am
by Lavabe
Miles wrote::obscene-sexualbutt:
This is obviously a scene from "There Will Be Blood". That's Daniel Plainview jumping up and down behind his son and that's oil spewing from the earth.

:obscene-sexualdoggy:
Poor guy in the front is choking and the guy in the back is giving the Heimlich maneuver. Looks exhausting.

:obscene-sexualvlick:
This guy has a goiter. And for some reason, it inspires him to yodle.
I'm beginning to get my red card. :flame: :flame:

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 10:03 am
by Miles
Lavabe wrote:
Miles wrote::obscene-sexualbutt:
This is obviously a scene from "There Will Be Blood". That's Daniel Plainview jumping up and down behind his son and that's oil spewing from the earth.

:obscene-sexualdoggy:
Poor guy in the front is choking and the guy in the back is giving the Heimlich maneuver. Looks exhausting.

:obscene-sexualvlick:
This guy has a goiter. And for some reason, it inspires him to yodle.
I'm beginning to get my red card. :flame: :flame:
Better confer with your fellow mod. He started it. ;)

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 10:07 am
by Lavabe
Miles wrote:
Lavabe wrote:I'm beginning to get my red card. :flame: :flame:
Better confer with your fellow mod. He started it. ;)
As in the sports motif, I don't red card the person who started it. I bring out the red card for the person who unnecessarily piles on.
:banned: :angry-fire:

Re: Thanks to Lawgrad91, welcome moderator Bjornolf!

Posted: August 3rd, 2010, 10:10 am
by Lavabe
Lavabe wrote:
Miles wrote:
Lavabe wrote:I'm beginning to get my red card. :flame: :flame:
Better confer with your fellow mod. He started it. ;)
As in the sports motif, I don't red card the person who started it. I bring out the red card for the person who unnecessarily piles on.
:banned: :angry-fire:
Of course, as in the sports model (especially with the NFL), I can be bought off. :twocents: