Paintings vs. Photos
Moderator: CameronBornAndBred
- EarlJam
- PWing School Associate Professor
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: April 9th, 2009, 2:58 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
Paintings vs. Photos
This one is for Chris.
I have a serious question. I LOVE the paintings of Duke and other players in action. I love them more than the photos, ......but why?
The photos and the painting capture the exact same thing right? Or do they?
Discuss.
-EarlJam
P.S. I still want a print of Chris' painting of the trail that bends slightly behind the brushes to the left.
I have a serious question. I LOVE the paintings of Duke and other players in action. I love them more than the photos, ......but why?
The photos and the painting capture the exact same thing right? Or do they?
Discuss.
-EarlJam
P.S. I still want a print of Chris' painting of the trail that bends slightly behind the brushes to the left.
Your mama wears combat boots to bed.
- CameronBornAndBred
- PWing School Chancellor
- Posts: 16139
- Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
- Location: New Bern, NC
- Contact:
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
They do.EarlJam wrote: The photos and the painting capture the exact same thing right? Or do they?
They both capture the exact same image.
Neither of them expresses the image the same.
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
CameronBornAndBred wrote:They do.EarlJam wrote: The photos and the painting capture the exact same thing right? Or do they?
They both capture the exact same image.
Neither of them expresses the image the same.
Well said Chris!! Love the new painting!
~Shelly
- EarlJam
- PWing School Associate Professor
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: April 9th, 2009, 2:58 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
I second that. I love it too! And I want one!fordgrl00 wrote:CameronBornAndBred wrote:They do.EarlJam wrote: The photos and the painting capture the exact same thing right? Or do they?
They both capture the exact same image.
Neither of them expresses the image the same.
Well said Chris!! Love the new painting!
-EJ
Your mama wears combat boots to bed.
- EarlJam
- PWing School Associate Professor
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: April 9th, 2009, 2:58 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
Also, I want to be very clear that in no way was I saying, in effect, "So!? They look the same!"
Far from it. I can clearly tell how much more special the painting is, and how it really brings the moment to life far more than a mere photo could ever do.
I just couldn't find the word or words to explain why that is. You did.
Again, awesome work!
-EarlJam
Far from it. I can clearly tell how much more special the painting is, and how it really brings the moment to life far more than a mere photo could ever do.
I just couldn't find the word or words to explain why that is. You did.
Again, awesome work!
-EarlJam
Your mama wears combat boots to bed.
-
- PWing School Chancellor
- Posts: 10893
- Joined: August 25th, 2009, 9:36 pm
- Location: Efland,NC
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
What EJ said is so true. I love the paintings.EarlJam wrote:Also, I want to be very clear that in no way was I saying, in effect, "So!? They look the same!"
Far from it. I can clearly tell how much more special the painting is, and how it really brings the moment to life far more than a mere photo could ever do.
I just couldn't find the word or words to explain why that is. You did.
Again, awesome work!
-EarlJam
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
I disagree. I do not feel a painting and a picture shows the same exact thing.EarlJam wrote:I LOVE the paintings of Duke and other players in action. I love them more than the photos, ......but why?
The photos and the painting capture the exact same thing right? Or do they?
Discuss.
-EarlJam
Well ok, there are some that do and are done in a purposeful fashion to be identical,
but the majority of the paintings show more of a human interpretation versus a mechanical one.
A brush stroke, IMHO, says way way more than a single pixel of a picture. Plus there is the human equation, the element that goes into the painting that conveys something that a picture doesn't.
I'll take a painting over a picture any day of the week.
- EarlJam
- PWing School Associate Professor
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: April 9th, 2009, 2:58 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
Agreed, hence, my follow-up post...knights68 wrote:I disagree. I do not feel a painting and a picture shows the same exact thing.EarlJam wrote:I LOVE the paintings of Duke and other players in action. I love them more than the photos, ......but why?
The photos and the painting capture the exact same thing right? Or do they?
Discuss.
-EarlJam
Well ok, there are some that do and are done in a purposeful fashion to be identical,
but the majority of the paintings show more of a human interpretation versus a mechanical one.
A brush stroke, IMHO, says way way more than a single pixel of a picture. Plus there is the human equation, the element that goes into the painting that conveys something that a picture doesn't.
I'll take a painting over a picture any day of the week.
Also, I want to be very clear that in no way was I saying, in effect, "So!? They look the same!"
Far from it. I can clearly tell how much more special the painting is, and how it really brings the moment to life far more than a mere photo could ever do.
I just couldn't find the word or words to explain why that is. You did.
Again, awesome work!
-EarlJam
Your mama wears combat boots to bed.
- Miles
- PWing School Associate Professor
- Posts: 3318
- Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
- Contact:
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
I think I get the point your making but I think photographers can be just as expressive as painters, illustrators, sculptors, potters, etc. Give 10 photographers the same camera and the same subject matter and ask them to take pictures, and you'll end up with 10 very different photos. People interpret things differently and that translates or is expressed in the print, whether it be digital or paper/chemistry based.knights68 wrote:I disagree. I do not feel a painting and a picture shows the same exact thing.EarlJam wrote:I LOVE the paintings of Duke and other players in action. I love them more than the photos, ......but why?
The photos and the painting capture the exact same thing right? Or do they?
Discuss.
-EarlJam
Well ok, there are some that do and are done in a purposeful fashion to be identical,
but the majority of the paintings show more of a human interpretation versus a mechanical one.
A brush stroke, IMHO, says way way more than a single pixel of a picture. Plus there is the human equation, the element that goes into the painting that conveys something that a picture doesn't.
I'll take a painting over a picture any day of the week.
sMiles
- CameronBornAndBred
- PWing School Chancellor
- Posts: 16139
- Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
- Location: New Bern, NC
- Contact:
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
I completely agree. I have a number of photos that work much better as the photo they are instead of the painting that they could be. Here's one example..Miles wrote: I think I get the point your making but I think photographers can be just as expressive as painters, illustrators, sculptors, potters, etc. Give 10 photographers the same camera and the same subject matter and ask them to take pictures, and you'll end up with 10 very different photos. People interpret things differently and that translates or is expressed in the print, whether it be digital or paper/chemistry based.
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
- Miles
- PWing School Associate Professor
- Posts: 3318
- Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
- Contact:
Re: Paintings vs. Photos
Gorgeous and a great example. Nice composition, contrast, and lots of movement. Hurray photographs.CameronBornAndBred wrote:I completely agree. I have a number of photos that work much better as the photo they are instead of the painting that they could be. Here's one example..Miles wrote: I think I get the point your making but I think photographers can be just as expressive as painters, illustrators, sculptors, potters, etc. Give 10 photographers the same camera and the same subject matter and ask them to take pictures, and you'll end up with 10 very different photos. People interpret things differently and that translates or is expressed in the print, whether it be digital or paper/chemistry based.
sMiles