Page 1 of 2

NIT Discussion

Posted: March 16th, 2010, 9:02 pm
by ArkieDukie
Did anyone else see the end of the UConn-Northeastern game? It appeared to me that the refs did everything they could to help UConn at the end of the game. Every single out-of-bounds went to UConn, and fouls on potential game-winning shots were ignored. Did anyone else notice this, or am I imagining things?

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 16th, 2010, 10:57 pm
by devildeac
ArkieDukie wrote:Did anyone else see the end of the UConn-Northeastern game? It appeared to me that the refs did everything they could to help UConn at the end of the game. Every single out-of-bounds went to UConn, and fouls on potential game-winning shots were ignored. Did anyone else notice this, or am I imagining things?
Were they the same ass :o) s who "reffed" the 2004 men's semi-final game?
X( X(

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 16th, 2010, 11:31 pm
by DukeUsul
W&M made a couple too many turnovers down the stretch to pull it out against the Heels.

Dadgumit.

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 16th, 2010, 11:35 pm
by ArkieDukie
DukeUsul wrote:W&M made a couple too many turnovers down the stretch to pull it out against the Heels.

Dadgumit.
That bummed me out too, dadgummit!

I would really like to see how this game would've turned out if the teams had been properly seeded (with the holes playing at W&M) and the holes hadn't hand-picked the refs. I mean, c'mon. Karl Hess? Really?

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 16th, 2010, 11:37 pm
by ArkieDukie
A thought to ponder: the articles in the press have gone on and on about how great the NIT field is since it contains UConn and unc. Are the powers-that-be stacking the deck so that their favorite "traditionally strong programs" wil be in the championship game in order to boost TV ratings?

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 16th, 2010, 11:40 pm
by ArkieDukie
devildeac wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:Did anyone else see the end of the UConn-Northeastern game? It appeared to me that the refs did everything they could to help UConn at the end of the game. Every single out-of-bounds went to UConn, and fouls on potential game-winning shots were ignored. Did anyone else notice this, or am I imagining things?
Were they the same ass :o) s who "reffed" the 2004 men's semi-final game?
X( X(
I don't know, devild***, but they could've been. Lavabe accused me of being you in Section 21, since I was commenting on all the fouls that were being ignored by Karl Hess and his good buddies.

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 16th, 2010, 11:43 pm
by ArkieDukie
Way to go, Pack! Winning at USF - way to go! I really missed El Sid's red jacket tonight. Hope it makes a reappearance.

Kudos on the inbounds play that got the game-winning basket. If El Sid designed that play he is an evil genius. We were debating in Section 21 whether or not the play was intended to go down that way. Survey question: was State lucky to score on a busted play, or did the play go down exactly as planned?

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 16th, 2010, 11:58 pm
by devildeac
ArkieDukie wrote:
devildeac wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:Did anyone else see the end of the UConn-Northeastern game? It appeared to me that the refs did everything they could to help UConn at the end of the game. Every single out-of-bounds went to UConn, and fouls on potential game-winning shots were ignored. Did anyone else notice this, or am I imagining things?
Were they the same ass :o) s who "reffed" the 2004 men's semi-final game?
X( X(
I don't know, devild***, but they could've been. Lavabe accused me of being you in Section 21, since I was commenting on all the fouls that were being ignored by Karl Hess and his good buddies.
Still can't believe that game was at carmichael.

Still can't believe they were even selected for the nit...
X( X(

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 17th, 2010, 5:59 am
by pinkbend
The refs for UConn were the same refs Duke had against Miami in the ACC tournament. Okay, so I can't prove that, but the calls sho' nuff reminded me of the incompetent refs who tried to give the game to Miami. (And when I watched the tape again last night, the calls were just as bad as when we saw them in person.)

As for the tarholes playing in Carbuncle...gee, what a privilege! A "strong" NIT? Isn't that an oxymoron? Am I the only person in the universe who thinks the tarholes demise is a sports writer's call to pump the team UP? After all, the NC "journalists" come from Crappy Hell's trade school.

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 17th, 2010, 7:47 am
by CameronBornAndBred
ArkieDukie wrote:Way to go, Pack! Winning at USF - way to go! I really missed El Sid's red jacket tonight. Hope it makes a reappearance.

Kudos on the inbounds play that got the game-winning basket. If El Sid designed that play he is an evil genius. We were debating in Section 21 whether or not the play was intended to go down that way. Survey question: was State lucky to score on a busted play, or did the play go down exactly as planned?
I think it was designed like that, AND a break down on USF's defense. And while that was the game winner, the game wasn't won until the Pack played some great D of their own. Good to see them moving on.

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 17th, 2010, 9:01 am
by Lavabe
ArkieDukie wrote:I mean, c'mon. Karl Hess? Really?
REALLY?!

Wasn't Karl Hess calling last night's UConn game as well? Because given the incredible last two minutes of that game, it sure seemed he was there.

REALLY?!

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 17th, 2010, 9:03 am
by devildeac
Coulda been the same toads who reffed the 2 ky-msu game this year...

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 17th, 2010, 1:28 pm
by Jesus_hurley
ArkieDukie wrote:A thought to ponder: the articles in the press have gone on and on about how great the NIT field is since it contains UConn and unc. Are the powers-that-be stacking the deck so that their favorite "traditionally strong programs" wil be in the championship game in order to boost TV ratings?
Yes

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 17th, 2010, 8:44 pm
by devildeac
Jesus_hurley wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:A thought to ponder: the articles in the press have gone on and on about how great the NIT field is since it contains UConn and unc. Are the powers-that-be stacking the deck so that their favorite "traditionally strong programs" wil be in the championship game in order to boost TV ratings?
Yes
FT:

Bill and Mary=4
holes=26

WTF?

X( X(

One of the refs was karl "the terrible" hess

any coincidence?

that is just unfreakingbelievable...

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 18th, 2010, 12:14 pm
by devildeac
devildeac wrote:
Jesus_hurley wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:A thought to ponder: the articles in the press have gone on and on about how great the NIT field is since it contains UConn and unc. Are the powers-that-be stacking the deck so that their favorite "traditionally strong programs" wil be in the championship game in order to boost TV ratings?
Yes
FT:

Bill and Mary=4
holes=26

WTF?

X( X(

One of the refs was karl "the terrible" hess

any coincidence?

that is just unfreakingbelievable...
BTTT.

Just didn't want anyone to miss this glaring stat.

X( X(

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 18th, 2010, 2:34 pm
by Jesus_hurley
^ Just another typical game in chapel hell...

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 18th, 2010, 11:27 pm
by ArkieDukie
devildeac wrote:
Jesus_hurley wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:A thought to ponder: the articles in the press have gone on and on about how great the NIT field is since it contains UConn and unc. Are the powers-that-be stacking the deck so that their favorite "traditionally strong programs" wil be in the championship game in order to boost TV ratings?
Yes
FT:

Bill and Mary=4
holes=26

WTF?

X( X(

One of the refs was karl "the terrible" hess

any coincidence?

that is just unfreakingbelievable...
QFE

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 19th, 2010, 8:52 am
by Lavabe
ArkieDukie wrote:
devildeac wrote: FT:

Bill and Mary=4
holes=26

WTF?

X( X(

One of the refs was karl "the terrible" hess

any coincidence?

that is just unfreakingbelievable...
QFE
I think Karl Hess is the Hot Tub Time Machine version of Lenny Wirtz.

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 19th, 2010, 9:12 am
by Very Duke Blue
Lavabe wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:
devildeac wrote: FT:

Bill and Mary=4
holes=26

WTF?

X( X(

One of the refs was karl "the terrible" hess

any coincidence?

I think Karl Hess is the Hot Tub Time Machine version of Lenny Wirtz.
Ah, Lenny Wirtz. Memoirs :twisted: :Boo: :Boo: :ymtongue: :ymsick:

Re: NIT Discussion

Posted: March 20th, 2010, 1:32 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
The holes are down by only 3. Grrrr. X(