crazietalk.net

Conspiracy theories exist with almost any and all major events that happen in history. Where do you stand? For the most part, I believe conspiracy theorists are nut cases, however, I am not so close-minded as to believe everything the government tells us. I believe elements to some conspiracy theories.

For instance, it would not surprise me one bit to find that Roosevelt knew the Japanese were going to attack us. I'm not saying he just let it happen. I'm not even saying there is a conspiracy at all. It just wouldn't surprise me. Roosevelt ran on partly the promise that we would not get involved in another world war. Finding our "participation" inevitable, he needed a reason. A damn good reason. There were SO many warning signs that got ignored. But the damning thing to me is, all of our aircraft carriers were thousands of miles from Pearl that Sunday morning. Why? Certainly not the norm.

Again, if I had to lay money on it, I'd bet on the official story. I'm not a conspiracy guy, but I DO have questions. Same with the moon landing (we had all the motives to fake a landing with the cold war and such); JFK assassination, and even parts of 9/11. As a person who is an amateur but knowlegable student of aviation, and who has hours of flying under his belt (still far short of getting pilot's certificate), it still befuddles me how such novice pilots could be so good and accurate with huge commercial airliners. That said, again, I do believe the "official" story. I just have questions.

What about you? Honestly and sincerely, what conspiracy theories, if any, do you believe to be the most convincing???

-EarlJam

I'm not a huge conspiracy theorist. The only ones that I tend to lend any credence to are the ones that involve the fewest people. I could never buy the moon landing hoax conspiracies because of the sheer number of people involved in NASA and all their contracting companies. It would just never be kept secret. Something like the assassination of JFK.... I could totally buy a conspiracy there, because so few people would need to be involved.

I saw the name of the thread and thought this would be about the Maryland game last night!

Devil in the Blue Dress wrote:I saw the name of the thread and thought this would be about the Maryland game last night!

I thought the same thing. But then it woulda been moved to The Stadium.

The Roswell conspiracy.
I believe the government was covering something up, just not sure what.
Aliens? Weather balloons? Who knows, but I am sure the government was covering something up.

I used to work with the White House physician when JFK was in office. He said the Warren Commission got it right, as did Teddy Kennedy.

I'm not a big believer in conspiracy theories as there are just too many people needed to pull things off, or keep things quiet.

EarlJam wrote:... Same with the moon landing (we had all the motives to fake a landing with the cold war and such); ...

This was on Myth Busters the other night (rerun from Aug 2008). They actually made a replica of entire scene/picture and I think they proved that this was done in a studio due to requirement for multiple light sources, however, near the end of the show, they made some topographical adjustments and demonstrated that the studio setup could look like the picture.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wym04J_3Ls0 - shadows on moon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWMz51eL0Y&NR=1 - astronaut in the shadow or not?

cl15876 wrote:

EarlJam wrote:... Same with the moon landing (we had all the motives to fake a landing with the cold war and such); ...

This was on Myth Busters the other night (rerun from Aug 2008). They actually made a replica of entire scene/picture and I think they proved that this was done in a studio due to requirement for multiple light sources, however, near the end of the show, they made some topographical adjustments and demonstrated that the studio setup could look like the picture.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wym04J_3Ls0 - shadows on moon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWMz51eL0Y&NR=1 - astronaut in the shadow or not?

They proved that the conspiracy theorists' claim that the direction of the shadows in the photo could only be accomplished using multiple light sources simply wasn't true and that the topography of the moon affected the shadows. So they debunked the claim that conspiracy theorists most often rely on as 'proof'. They also thoroughly debunked the conspiracy theorists' claims regarding the photo of the astronaut taken on the moon.

They didn't say the moon landing wasn't faked but they did demonstrate that the 'proof' used to support or prove conspiracy theories about the moon landing was no proof at all.

colchar wrote:

cl15876 wrote:

EarlJam wrote:... Same with the moon landing (we had all the motives to fake a landing with the cold war and such); ...

This was on Myth Busters the other night (rerun from Aug 2008). They actually made a replica of entire scene/picture and I think they proved that this was done in a studio due to requirement for multiple light sources, however, near the end of the show, they made some topographical adjustments and demonstrated that the studio setup could look like the picture.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wym04J_3Ls0 - shadows on moon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWMz51eL0Y&NR=1 - astronaut in the shadow or not?

They proved that the conspiracy theorists' claim that the direction of the shadows in the photo could only be accomplished using multiple light sources simply wasn't true and that the topography of the moon affected the shadows. So they debunked the claim that conspiracy theorists most often rely on as 'proof'. They also thoroughly debunked the conspiracy theorists' claims regarding the photo of the astronaut taken on the moon.

They didn't say the moon landing wasn't faked but they did demonstrate that the 'proof' used to support or prove conspiracy theories about the moon landing was no proof at all.

I wish you would have narrated when I watched. Your explanation makes perfect sense! I was only paying 1/2 attention and it sounded like they proved it in the start and then retracted it in the end, but when they said busted, I got confused. Thanks for clarifying! I still believed we did it!

cl15876 wrote: This was on Myth Busters the other night (rerun from Aug 2008). They actually made a replica of entire scene/picture and I think they proved that this was done in a studio due to requirement for multiple light sources, however, near the end of the show, they made some topographical adjustments and demonstrated that the studio setup could look like the picture. ?

For those that don't know..model making is what those guys did (and do) for a living. %90 percent of that crowd's last job before the TV show was working on Star Wars. What a kick ass job.

"What did you do today"
"Well, I built a small village, then I went to lunch, and then I let Darth Vader blow my village to smithereens."

TillyGalore wrote:I used to work with the White House physician when JFK was in office. He said the Warren Commission got it right, as did Teddy Kennedy.

I'm not a big believer in conspiracy theories as there are just too many people needed to pull things off, or keep things quiet.

Funny, but you don't look that old! If you were only 20 when JFK was in office, you'd be near 70something today, so NO WAY!

TillyGalore wrote:I used to work with the White House physician when JFK was in office. He said the Warren Commission got it right, as did Teddy Kennedy.

I'm not a big believer in conspiracy theories as there are just too many people needed to pull things off, or keep things quiet.

I am not a believer in conspiracy theories either but I have a really hard time believing the magic bullet theory.

OZZIE4DUKE wrote:

TillyGalore wrote:I used to work with the White House physician when JFK was in office. He said the Warren Commission got it right, as did Teddy Kennedy.

I'm not a big believer in conspiracy theories as there are just too many people needed to pull things off, or keep things quiet.

Funny, but you don't look that old! If you were only 20 when JFK was in office, you'd be near 70something today, so NO WAY!

Maybe she uses Oil of Olay.

OZZIE4DUKE wrote:

TillyGalore wrote:I used to work with the White House physician when JFK was in office. He said the Warren Commission got it right, as did Teddy Kennedy.

I'm not a big believer in conspiracy theories as there are just too many people needed to pull things off, or keep things quiet.

Funny, but you don't look that old! If you were only 20 when JFK was in office, you'd be near 70something today, so NO WAY!

Hey! I look pretty damn good for my age. ;) ;) ;)

My favorite conspiracy theory: Duke gets all the calls.


By the way, I don't believe it.

I really enjoy reading about conspiracy theories, but I'm not quick to believe everything I've read.
I don't buy the moon-landing hoax theory.
I don't buy the magic bullet theory.
I don't buy the government's official explanation of 9/11.

Miles wrote:I don't buy the magic bullet theory.

Do you buy this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEzBeP6pRoY

Lavabe wrote:

Miles wrote:I don't buy the magic bullet theory.

Do you buy this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEzBeP6pRoY

Hilarious!!!! I love it!!!! Sad thing is "WE may never know the real truth! "

How many licks does it take to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop?

Lavabe wrote:How many licks does it take to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop?

THREE!