Oscar Nominations Announced

Anything goes, all topics welcome!

Moderator: CameronBornAndBred

Post Reply
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 16130
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by CameronBornAndBred » February 2nd, 2010, 9:21 am

Best picture

"Avatar"
"The Hurt Locker"
"Precious: Based on the novel 'Push' by Sapphire"
"Up in the Air"
"Inglourious Basterds"
"Up"
"The Blind Side"
"District 9"
"An Education"
"A Serious Man"

I think it's really cool that "Up" got a nod in this category. I thought Wall*E was deserving before, but it didn't happen.
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by Miles » February 2nd, 2010, 11:44 am

I found all but one of the nominations for Avatar to be fitting. I don't think the movie deserved the nod for Best Picture. It is entirely incomplete as a picture. The script is horrible, the human acting is wretched, and I just don't see how it could stack up against previous winners in the category. I think it should sweep the technical categories.
sMiles
User avatar
DukeUsul
PWing School Assistant Professor
PWing School Assistant Professor
Posts: 2390
Joined: April 14th, 2009, 9:30 am
Location: Back in the dirty Jerz
Contact:

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by DukeUsul » February 2nd, 2010, 12:02 pm

Miles wrote:I found all but one of the nominations for Avatar to be fitting. I don't think the movie deserved the nod for Best Picture. It is entirely incomplete as a picture. The script is horrible, the human acting is wretched, and I just don't see how it could stack up against previous winners in the category. I think it should sweep the technical categories.
QFE
-- DukeUsul
MHTorringjan
I don't know what PWing is.
I don't know what PWing is.
Posts: 11
Joined: January 11th, 2010, 11:16 am

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by MHTorringjan » February 2nd, 2010, 12:09 pm

Agreed on Avatar's quality as a movie in and of itself. Its nomination for Best Picture is probably just a shot for populist appeal that the Oscars have lacked in recent years. Also, it seems an acknowledgment that it was so technically superior to other films this year that it deserves consideration. I'd be surprised if it wins, as it'd mainly be based on buzz and box-office revenues, but stranger things have happened. Personally, I'm disappointed that I only saw 3 of the 5 nominees for Animated picture. I must be slacking. :-B I sincerely doubt there's much contest with "Up" for that category.
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 16130
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by CameronBornAndBred » February 2nd, 2010, 12:41 pm

Miles wrote:I found all but one of the nominations for Avatar to be fitting. I don't think the movie deserved the nod for Best Picture. It is entirely incomplete as a picture. The script is horrible, the human acting is wretched, and I just don't see how it could stack up against previous winners in the category. I think it should sweep the technical categories.
Sounds just like Titanic.
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by Miles » February 2nd, 2010, 4:32 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote:
Miles wrote:I found all but one of the nominations for Avatar to be fitting. I don't think the movie deserved the nod for Best Picture. It is entirely incomplete as a picture. The script is horrible, the human acting is wretched, and I just don't see how it could stack up against previous winners in the category. I think it should sweep the technical categories.
Sounds just like Titanic.
I agree with you wholeheartedly. However, I"m willing to accept arguments from others that see the merit in Titanic winning. Titanic didn't rely solely on the special effects, so I feel like there should be some room to discuss other aspects of the movie. Take away the digital rendered world of Avatar, and replace it with actors in big costumes or claymation and the movie is a pile of tripe.
sMiles
User avatar
Miles
PWing School Associate Professor
PWing School Associate Professor
Posts: 3318
Joined: April 10th, 2009, 9:55 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC!!!
Contact:

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by Miles » February 2nd, 2010, 4:35 pm

Miles wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
Miles wrote:I found all but one of the nominations for Avatar to be fitting. I don't think the movie deserved the nod for Best Picture. It is entirely incomplete as a picture. The script is horrible, the human acting is wretched, and I just don't see how it could stack up against previous winners in the category. I think it should sweep the technical categories.
Sounds just like Titanic.
I agree with you wholeheartedly. However, I"m willing to accept arguments from others that see the merit in Titanic winning. Titanic didn't rely solely on the special effects, so I feel like there should be some room to discuss other aspects of the movie. Take away the digital rendered world of Avatar, and replace it with actors in big costumes or claymation and the movie is a pile of tripe.
On second thought, animation a la "Clash of the Titans" and "Jason and the Argonauts" might improve "Avatar". It would force the script writers to do their jobs, and force the actors to ac. It would look badass.
sMiles
User avatar
Rolvix
Graduate Student at PWing school
Graduate Student at PWing school
Posts: 1878
Joined: May 31st, 2009, 8:32 pm
Location: Leaving Durham -- off to Haiti

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by Rolvix » February 2nd, 2010, 5:40 pm

I saw District 9, The Blind Side, Inglourious Basterds, and Avatar.

I can't see anything beating The Blind Side but I really enjoyed Inglourious Basterds!
Class of 2014
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 16130
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by CameronBornAndBred » February 2nd, 2010, 6:00 pm

Rolvix wrote:I saw District 9, The Blind Side, Inglourious Basterds, and Avatar.
Watch Up. It won't win (it will win best animated I bet), but it is worthy of being there. When it's not emotionally sweet, it's funny as hell. Classic Pixar.
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
User avatar
Lavabe
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 11122
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 8:02 pm
Location: Land of the Lost, Kentucky (pining for the fjords of Madagascar)

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by Lavabe » February 2nd, 2010, 6:18 pm

CameronBornAndBred wrote:Best picture

"Avatar"
"The Hurt Locker"
"Precious: Based on the novel 'Push' by Sapphire"
"Up in the Air"
"Inglourious Basterds"
"Up"
"The Blind Side"
"District 9"
"An Education"
"A Serious Man"

I think it's really cool that "Up" got a nod in this category. I thought Wall*E was deserving before, but it didn't happen.
Since when have they had that many nominees in the Best Film category?
2014, 2011, and 2009 Lemur Loving CTN NASCAR Champ. No lasers were used to win these titles.
User avatar
CameronBornAndBred
PWing School Chancellor
Posts: 16130
Joined: April 8th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: Oscar Nominations Announced

Post by CameronBornAndBred » February 2nd, 2010, 6:24 pm

Lavabe wrote: Since when have they had that many nominees in the Best Film category?
1945.
This year they upped it 10.
Duke born, Duke bred, cooking on a grill so I'm tailgate fed.
Post Reply