crazietalk.net

If so, you might be interested in tomorrow's scheduled first flight of Boeing's new 787 "Dreamliner."

Lots of coverage on it here: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/

There will probably be video available here: http://king5.com, after the flight.

DevilAlumna wrote:If so, you might be interested in tomorrow's scheduled first flight of Boeing's new 787 "Dreamliner."

Lots of coverage on it here: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/

There will probably be video available here: http://king5.com, after the flight.

Have they designed it for passengers who are <4'10" tall and <80 pounds?

Lavabe wrote:

DevilAlumna wrote:If so, you might be interested in tomorrow's scheduled first flight of Boeing's new 787 "Dreamliner."

Lots of coverage on it here: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/

There will probably be video available here: http://king5.com, after the flight.

Have they designed it for passengers who are <4'10" tall and <80 pounds?

Why? That certainly doesn't fit your description. You want munchkins to sit out on the wing?

OOOOOOH! OOOOOOH!!!

MEEE! ME!!!!

I have always loved all things aviation and am halfway through getting my pilot's certificate (I ran out of money a couple of years ago during lessons). It WILL happen though.

Thanks for this! This is awesome!

-EJ

As an aviation buff, I must say I'm quite dissapointed in the design of this plane. I know engineers could care less about the looks and are more concerned with performance, but I'm just speaking from my eyeballs. The plane simply looks like a glorified 737. Standard fuselage with one engine mounted on each wing. In short, the plane looks boring. At least their recently launched 777 had a massive wingspan that offered somewhat of a unique look from the rest of the fleet.

Give me the days of the L-1011, the DC-10, the 727. Planes that offered a variety of design.

Damn this plane. Damn it all to hell.

Okay, kidding. Do NOT damn the plane. But I do wish they'd come up with a more fodingulated design.

-EarlJam

EarlJam wrote:As an aviation buff, I must say I'm quite dissapointed in the design of this plane. I know engineers could care less about the looks and are more concerned with performance, but I'm just speaking from my eyeballs. The plane simply looks like a glorified 737. Standard fuselage with one engine mounted on each wing. In short, the plane looks boring. At least their recently launched 777 had a massive wingspan that offered somewhat of a unique look from the rest of the fleet.

Give me the days of the L-1011, the DC-10, the 727. Planes that offered a variety of design.

Damn this plane. Damn it all to hell.

Okay, kidding. Do NOT damn the plane. But I do wish they'd come up with a more fodingulated design.

-EarlJam

You should check out the DreamLifter, a plane specifically built to ferry parts from farflung factories to Washington state, for the Dreamliner.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747 ... _Freighter

If you like old war planes, visit www.b17project.com . They are rebuilding a B17 bomber in Urbana, Ohio and documenting it online. You can also visit the hangar if you are near Grimes Field.

My favorite plane was the BF109 - although the RAF Spitfire looked pretty freakin' cool! I want to see the inside of the new Boeing before I judge it.

Has the Airbus made it to production yet?

DukieInKansas wrote:If you like old war planes, visit http://www.b17project.com . They are rebuilding a B17 bomber in Urbana, Ohio and documenting it online. You can also visit the hangar if you are near Grimes Field.

YES! I have been to this site! I am a HUGE fan of the B-17. It is my favorite plane from WWII. Very "sexy."

They had an airshow here in Atlanta about three years ago. I was playing softball (left center field). I heard a deep roaring sound of multiple props. I looked up and a B-17 flew right over the ballfield at low altitude. I was like a little kid, and for that moment, the softball game meant NOTHING to me. I told the left fielder, "Look! That's a B-17!" He looked at me like, "So?" It made my day.

Other WWII plane favorites: SBD Douglas Dauntless dive bomber, F4U Coursair (sp?), P51 Mustang, Hellcat.

-EarlJam

EarlJam wrote:

DukieInKansas wrote:If you like old war planes, visit http://www.b17project.com . They are rebuilding a B17 bomber in Urbana, Ohio and documenting it online. You can also visit the hangar if you are near Grimes Field.

YES! I have been to this site! I am a HUGE fan of the B-17. It is my favorite plane from WWII. Very "sexy."

They had an airshow here in Atlanta about three years ago. I was playing softball (left center field). I heard a deep roaring sound of multiple props. I looked up and a B-17 flew right over the ballfield at low altitude. I was like a little kid, and for that moment, the softball game meant NOTHING to me. I told the left fielder, "Look! That's a B-17!" He looked at me like, "So?" It made my day.

Other WWII plane favorites: SBD Douglas Dauntless dive bomber, F4U Coursair (sp?), P51 Mustang, Hellcat.

-EarlJam

One of my brothers-in-law knows the family that started this. When we visited, they let the kids try out the riveter.

It is very cool to go visit the airfield and hear the stories about WWII vets that have visited and the stories they have told. One gentleman came with either his son or grandson and told stories about his time in the aircraft. It was the first time the son/grandson had ever heard that the vet had to jump (or be pushed to jump) out of the aircraft after it was shot.

EarlJam wrote:Give me the days of the L-1011, the DC-10, the 727.

I loved the L-1011. I only got to fly on a few of them, but they were great. The engine in the tail, and super spacious cabin. What got me clued into it was reading "The Ghost of Flight 401" as a kid. That was one L-1011 you didn't want to be on, but I always looked for ghosts from that flight on the few I flew on.

The original Northrup Grumman plane was amazing and it actually flew for a few seconds! ;)

CameronBornAndBred wrote:

EarlJam wrote:Give me the days of the L-1011, the DC-10, the 727.

I loved the L-1011. I only got to fly on a few of them, but they were great. The engine in the tail, and super spacious cabin. What got me clued into it was reading "The Ghost of Flight 401" as a kid. That was one L-1011 you didn't want to be on, but I always looked for ghosts from that flight on the few I flew on.

Ahhhh....the 'Whisperjet'.

CameronBornAndBred wrote:

EarlJam wrote:Give me the days of the L-1011, the DC-10, the 727.

I loved the L-1011. I only got to fly on a few of them, but they were great. The engine in the tail, and super spacious cabin. What got me clued into it was reading "The Ghost of Flight 401" as a kid. That was one L-1011 you didn't want to be on, but I always looked for ghosts from that flight on the few I flew on.

Remember the movie with Ernest Bourgnine (sp)??

That was indeed a very pretty, sleek plane. Remember the big crash in Dallas in '85? The L-1011? Windsheer?

-EJ

EarlJam wrote:

CameronBornAndBred wrote:

EarlJam wrote:Give me the days of the L-1011, the DC-10, the 727.

I loved the L-1011. I only got to fly on a few of them, but they were great. The engine in the tail, and super spacious cabin. What got me clued into it was reading "The Ghost of Flight 401" as a kid. That was one L-1011 you didn't want to be on, but I always looked for ghosts from that flight on the few I flew on.

Remember the movie with Ernest Bourgnine (sp)??

That was indeed a very pretty, sleek plane. Remember the big crash in Dallas in '85? The L-1011? Windsheer?

-EJ

From McHales Navy? What a great show!!!!

We are getting into one this afternoon... ;)

devildeac wrote:We are getting into one this afternoon... ;)

Good to know you will be in it rather than on it.