Page 498 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:18 pm
by Rolvix
Yeah, probably not hitting 10k.
Ohhh well...

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:26 pm
by YmoBeThere
CellR wrote:Yeah, probably not hitting 10k.
Ohhh well...
Ummm...we could post some more.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:27 pm
by DukeUsul
I'm spent

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:29 pm
by wilson
DukeUsul wrote:I'm spent
Me too.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:38 pm
by wilson
Damn, it's like a friggin' tomb in here tonight. I'm mildly tempted to blitz on up to 10,000 by myself.
Dunno if I can handle that solo, though.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:42 pm
by YmoBeThere
Well, it wouldn't be entirely solo...

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:43 pm
by YmoBeThere
But for the most part, I'm spent also...

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:44 pm
by wilson
Yeah, the effort seems entirely halfhearted at this point. But hey, we've accomplished a lot in the past day and a half.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:44 pm
by wilson
wilson wrote:Yeah, the effort seems entirely halfhearted at this point. But hey, we've accomplished a lot in the past day and a half.
"Entirely halfhearted": Oxymoron?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:50 pm
by YmoBeThere
wilson wrote:
wilson wrote:Yeah, the effort seems entirely halfhearted at this point. But hey, we've accomplished a lot in the past day and a half.
"Entirely halfhearted": Oxymoron?
Entirely = In the whole? So, no?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:52 pm
by DukeUsul
On the (w)hole.....

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:54 pm
by wilson
YmoBeThere wrote:
wilson wrote:
wilson wrote:Yeah, the effort seems entirely halfhearted at this point. But hey, we've accomplished a lot in the past day and a half.
"Entirely halfhearted": Oxymoron?
Entirely = In the whole? So, no?
Dunno. Guess not. Too tired to grammar police.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:54 pm
by YmoBeThere
Well, that did get us a couple posts closer.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:55 pm
by YmoBeThere
Maybe we should leave this for Lavabe if he has a bout of insomnia tonight? Or DA or Sue71?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 10:56 pm
by YmoBeThere
DukeUsul wrote:On the (w)hole.....
Yeah, definitely On and not In

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 11:03 pm
by devildeac
wilson wrote:
devildeac wrote:Some remember nothing and others have seen bright lights or tunnels or periods of their lives flash before them.
When you say "periods of their lives flash before them," are we talking just little snapshots, or are these entire interludes playing on super duper fast-forward? I'm really interested in this (obviously I understand that you may not have gotten into that much detail with any of these people).
It has been a while, but they mentioned things like "seeing folks they had not seen in years" and flashes of memories of various events in their lives. Some of the things I wish I had documented so I can write my medical book when I retire.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 11:04 pm
by Very Duke Blue
OK, 1 more post.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 11:05 pm
by devildeac
YmoBeThere wrote:Maybe we should leave this for Lavabe if he has a bout of insomnia tonight? Or DA or Sue71?
DA? Who dat? She hasn't visited in a while.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 11:06 pm
by Very Duke Blue
Well, 2 more post.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 11:07 pm
by devildeac
I'm outta here. Don't have 40 + posts in me tonight either. Maybe 20... :oops: :roll: