Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:36 pm
Wonder how I can lock a thread... 
Shower quickly!CellR wrote: I might risk missing 999999999, or whatever it is...
The journey is worth more than the result, right?
crazietalk.net
-=OUR HOUSE=- A Forum for Fans of Duke Sports
https://crazietalk.net/ourhouse/
LTE 2.0
Page 492 of 2037
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:36 pm
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:36 pm
Usually soCellR wrote: I might risk missing 999999999, or whatever it is...
The journey is worth more than the result, right?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:36 pm
I figure it will probably be a free for all, although Ymo probably "deserves" it the most.devildeac wrote:Free for all for 9909 or a designated poster? I don't think we'll have time for a poll for that one... :oops: :roll:
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:36 pm
YmoBeThere wrote:9500 implies 409 posts to go. That has two meanings, the engine in a Chevy Impala SS from '61-'65 and obviously the cleaning agent, Formula 409.
Sweet ride!!!! Also the mustang from '65-'69!!!!
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:37 pm
Noooooooooooooooooo!!!!devildeac wrote:Wonder how I can lock a thread...
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:37 pm
Better figger it out soon... :roll:devildeac wrote:Wonder how I can lock a thread...
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:37 pm
Okay, I'm within 100 of Tilly now.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:37 pm
Is someone checking the clock? Have we exceeded 1 post per minute?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:37 pm
LOL, I was talking here in VA!!!!YmoBeThere wrote:I lived in Jamestown...Jamestown, North Carolina.wilson wrote:BTW, Ymo, your previous post was your Jamestown post.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:37 pm
He said he did not want it.CellR wrote:I figure it will probably be a free for all, although Ymo probably "deserves" it the most.devildeac wrote:Free for all for 9909 or a designated poster? I don't think we'll have time for a poll for that one... :oops: :roll:
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:37 pm
I shall miss 9909. I've gotta go now.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:38 pm
Go fer 2525!!!!wilson wrote:Not real sure what significance 2050 holds. Well, it's none, really, but the 50-post intervals seem mildly significant.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:38 pm
Got no time for that..YmoBeThere wrote:Is someone checking the clock? Have we exceeded 1 post per minute?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:38 pm
I'm nearing a bad number of posts to have.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:38 pm
The Japanese don't believe 9 is a lucky number. I think to them 9 is like 13 to many other people. I'm half-Japanese. And all numbers scare me.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:39 pm
Post through it...CellR wrote:I'm nearing a bad number of posts to have.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:39 pm
Done already... ;)cl15876 wrote:Go fer 2525!!!!wilson wrote:Not real sure what significance 2050 holds. Well, it's none, really, but the 50-post intervals seem mildly significant.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:39 pm
It might be hard to coordinate a designated person, unless you lock the thread.devildeac wrote:He said he did not want it.CellR wrote:I figure it will probably be a free for all, although Ymo probably "deserves" it the most.devildeac wrote:Free for all for 9909 or a designated poster? I don't think we'll have time for a poll for that one... :oops: :roll:
In that case, we could have a pretty good post for it.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 6:39 pm
I'm sure Dave or Chris will figure it out, hmmm, maybe a pirate also? Very interesting metric!!wilson wrote:Does anybody remember exactly when CellR wondered if we could get to 9909 in time? I'd love to know how many posts have elapsed since then.wilson wrote:Why, thank you. But it pales in comparison to the overall performance of the past ~30 hours around here.windsor wrote:What an impressive display of PWing Wilson.
