windsor wrote:Folgers crystals is not coffee by any sane definition of the word
DukeUsul wrote:Starbucks doesn't make coffee. That stuff is swill.
Agreed on both counts.
It has to be an extreme emergency to drink that instant crap! I would rather have one of those coffee "tea-bag like" single servings than instant crystals. I do have some Folgers crystals in my pantry and I saw it the other day and was wondering how old that jar was? I think it might be trash day soon and that's where it will end up!
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:20 pm
by cl15876
CathyCA wrote:
wilson wrote:
CathyCA wrote:I'm not planning on drinking it. As I wrote above, I would have preferred a thank-you note.
You should donate it for the teacher's lounge at one of your kids' school or something along those lines.
In my estimation, that site is for the most part a needless pastiche of the DBArr! , to say nothing of the fact that it's a blatant usurpation of our moniker.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:22 pm
by wilson
wilson wrote:In my estimation, that site is for the most part a needless pastiche of the DBArr! , to say nothing of the fact that it's a blatant usurpation of our moniker.
And this was a pretty delightfully overwrought sentence.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:23 pm
by cl15876
DukeUsul wrote:Whether you like his comedy or his politics or not, this is pretty impressive. I need to see if I can do it this well.
That is pretty cool and impressive!
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:24 pm
by DukieInKansas
knights68 wrote:have you farked today?
Can you do that in polite society?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:25 pm
by wilson
So I'm listed as a "PWing school professor" now. In light of the long academic road that still lies before me, that somehow seems a bit cruel.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:27 pm
by DukeUsul
bjornolf wrote:Didn't find us in the first ten pages. Guess we need to pump up the LTE some more. ;)
We're working on getting some good front page content. That's key to search engine optimization. I think I'm the hold up right now, from a technology perspective. Will work on it later today I promise!
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:27 pm
by Rolvix
cl15876 wrote:
DukeUsul wrote:Whether you like his comedy or his politics or not, this is pretty impressive. I need to see if I can do it this well.
That is pretty cool and impressive!
WOW! I am thoroughly impressed. I doubt I could even draw my neighborhood accurately, much less the United States!
I had to look it up. My guess involved passing gas while "in the act". I was wrong.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:35 pm
by wilson
A very cute girl just walked into Caribou. I may be ogling a little.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:36 pm
by wilson
wilson wrote:A very cute girl just walked into Caribou. I may be ogling a little.
OK, so I'm ogling.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:36 pm
by wilson
wilson wrote:
wilson wrote:A very cute girl just walked into Caribou. I may be ogling a little.
OK, so I'm ogling.
And the left ring finger is bare...always good.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:38 pm
by cl15876
wilson wrote:
wilson wrote:
wilson wrote:A very cute girl just walked into Caribou. I may be ogling a little.
OK, so I'm ogling.
And the left ring finger is bare...always good.
Blonde, Brunette, Red Head or multi colored with blue, purple, etc.?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:39 pm
by cl15876
I've got to run for now, but will catch up with all y' all later this afternoon/evening!!!!
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:39 pm
by wilson
cl15876 wrote:Blonde, Brunette, Red Head or multi colored with blue, purple, etc.?
Brunette (dark). Very nice not-quite-olive complexion. Thinnish, average height. Think I'll sneak another peek or two on the way to/from the restroom.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:52 pm
by Bostondevil
My oldest son could freehand the US at about age 6. He never was much of a drawer but he can do maps. He's also the guy to take with you to keep from getting lost. The family joke is we don't need GPS, we have 'Onboard Andrew'.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:58 pm
by CathyCA
DukeUsul wrote:Whether you like his comedy or his politics or not, this is pretty impressive. I need to see if I can do it this well.
He forgot the beaches of North Carolina. The Outer Banks are submerged in the Atlantic Ocean.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:59 pm
by CathyCA
bjornolf wrote:
CathyCA wrote:
Yes! We have posted about this before.
You're a Super Taster, too.
I don't think they are necessarily mutually exclusive. In the VAST majority of cases, I fall in the middle somewhere. I believe I fall in the "sensitive taster" category, but not quite the super taster. I think non super tasters CAN have an aversion to saccharin, and I think some super tasters DON'T have the aversion. I don't think one necessarily HAS to follow the other. I think it actually falls on a different part of the same chromosome, genetically.
GAH, you've thought about this a lot, haven't you?
I just think that artificial sweeteners taste bitter and they linger way too long.
And my cousin, the nutrition professor, calls me a "SuperTaster."
Agreed on both counts.DukeUsul wrote:Starbucks doesn't make coffee. That stuff is swill.
, to say nothing of the fact that it's a blatant usurpation of our moniker.
