Page 471 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 12:53 pm
by bjornolf
I just googled "crazie" to see if we came up anywhere. On the first page is "Crazie Talk on Twitter", which is a place for Duke fans to get news, apparently.

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 12:54 pm
by DukieInKansas
bjornolf wrote:
DukeUsul wrote:I'm going to try to increase my WFH frequency. I'm going to aim for 1-2 times per week.

bjornolf, I don't blame your wife. If I lived in DC again, I'd do the same. Here in Durham, the commute is easier.
What does WFH stand for? The only think I saw on the web was World Federation for Hemophilia. The only one I could come up with was "work for hire", but that doesn't even really make sense.

%%-
I believe it's Work From Home given the context.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 12:55 pm
by cl15876
windsor wrote:
wilson wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:Well, a "manageable" 580 posts or so to our goal. Have a good day everyone.

(Yes, I'll be back)
576 more after this one. We did a thousand posts in 12 hours yesterday. We can do this.
And God, we're a bunch of dorks.
Who are you calling a dork?
=)) =)) =)) =)) =)) We are all in good company!!!! =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) I need to go read the addiction thread again!!!! ;)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 12:55 pm
by bjornolf

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 12:57 pm
by cl15876
CathyCA wrote:
cl15876 wrote:
CathyCA wrote:"quote="wilson""More to Love' is one of those weekly elimination dating shows, featuring plus-sized women. Shockingly, it misses its supposed aim of acceptance and respect for people of all shapes and sizes and ends up being a wildly exploitative facsimile of every other such show."/quote"

Well, shoot. I was hoping that we'd have a show with regular people on it who find love on a TV show.

So tired of reality TV stars who look like celebrities.
=)) =)) =)) =)) =)) :ymdevil: :ymdevil: :ymdevil: :ymdevil: :ymdevil: =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) I am regular, you are regular, there is TV station down the street! You may look like a celebrity, but not I so we are half way there!!!! Split the difference with you? ;)
That TV station barely produces its own news shows. Ya think they'd put us on TV? Only if we showed up on the police blotter.

LOL - OR we could go sit by the traffic cam and wave!!! :-h :-h :-h :-h :)) :)) :))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 12:58 pm
by bjornolf
Nice. :-h :-h :-h :-h :-h :-h :-h

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:00 pm
by cl15876
CathyCA wrote:
DukeUsul wrote:
CellR wrote:I really like milk. I've had a lot of it recently.
Wanna know something weird? I hate milk. Loathe it. Can't stomach it.

But I LOOOOOVVVVVVVE chocolate milk. Odd huh?
I hate milk, too. When I was in Head Start (yes, my parents were THAT poor), my teacher made me drink my milk at lunch one day. I told her that I didn't like it. She told me that I WOULD drink it. In fact, she stood over me until I drank it.

And 30 seconds after I drank it, she was running off to find a mop and some towels because I regurgitated the milk and the cheeseburger I'd eaten all over the cafeteria table. And after she cleaned all that up, she put me in her car and she drove me home.

That teacher also taught me in second grade. She never, ever insisted again that I drink my milk.

Nor did any other teacher. Word gets around.
OH NO, that's soo sad!!!! :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: Did your mom or dad come to the school to have a talk with that teacher?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:00 pm
by bjornolf
Found this on the sixth or so page: http://crazietalk.wordpress.com/

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:02 pm
by bjornolf
Didn't find us in the first ten pages. Guess we need to pump up the LTE some more. ;)

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:03 pm
by cl15876
windsor wrote:I like chocolate milk....I don't like 'plain' milk...unless

1) warm chocolate chip cookies
2) chocolate cake
3) chocolate brownies

are available. Then I will drink regular milk.
What about OREOS?

I love whole MILK, 1/2% milk, can't understand why anyone would want to drink skim milk and I love Chocolate Milk!!! I can handle strawberry milk, but these days, only buy it for my daughter who loves it in moderation.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:05 pm
by bjornolf
I put in "crazie talk", and we were the second to last entry on the first page. The first two weren't even spelled right, "crazy talk". Wow.

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:07 pm
by wilson
Bostondevil wrote:
wilson wrote:
windsor wrote:Folgers crystals is not coffee by any sane definition of the word

~o) ~o)
DukeUsul wrote:Starbucks doesn't make coffee. That stuff is swill.
Agreed on both counts.
OH, didn't see this before I posted about Starbucks. So, you coffee drinkers are telling me that Starbucks coffee sucks? Really? I thought it was just their tea. But then again, I think all coffee sucks, so there you go.
Starbuck's uses under-ripe beans and then over-roasts them to compensate. That's why their coffee is always bitter and burned tasting. It really is shit, and that makes their ubiquity all the more perplexing.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:09 pm
by wilson
bjornolf wrote:What does WFH stand for? The only think I saw on the web was World Federation for Hemophilia. The only one I could come up with was "work for hire", but that doesn't even really make sense.

%%-
Work From Home. Forest and trees and all that.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:09 pm
by cl15876
CathyCA wrote:
DukeUsul wrote:Did I say I love coffee?
I have a bag of Starbucks Anniversary Blend on my desk. It was a gift from a client.

I would have preferred a thank-you note to a bag of coffee.
Congratulations! Can you take a picture of it with self-scribed commentary so you can put in the accolades notebook? Then we can drink that coffee!!!!! Yummmm!!!! ;)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:10 pm
by Very Duke Blue
bjornolf wrote:Found this on the sixth or so page: http://crazietalk.wordpress.com/

%%-
Thanks for the link. It's a fun read.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:14 pm
by wilson
Fewer than 500 posts to go, with 10:47 remaining in the day (13:47 if we allow for Pacific Time).
Totally doable.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:14 pm
by Rolvix
Very Duke Blue wrote:
bjornolf wrote:Found this on the sixth or so page: http://crazietalk.wordpress.com/

%%-
Thanks for the link. It's a fun read.
This webpage is not available.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:14 pm
by Rolvix
CellR wrote: This webpage is not available.
Nevermind, it worked. I'm pretty sure I've seen this website before!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:15 pm
by cl15876
wilson wrote:
CathyCA wrote:I'm not planning on drinking it. As I wrote above, I would have preferred a thank-you note.
You should donate it for the teacher's lounge at one of your kids' school or something along those lines.
That's also a good idea!!!!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 9th, 2009, 1:18 pm
by knights68
have you farked today?