Page 40 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 29th, 2009, 3:19 pm
by colchar
bjornolf wrote:
colchar wrote:I'm over 400 posts now and my status hasn't changed. That sucks. Just sayin'.
Dude, you're a moderator. Aren't you supposed to know the rules? I think it was posted that the status change comes at 500 posts.

Yeah, I knew the rules but figured I'd complain anyway - especially as it gave me the opportunity to PW!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 29th, 2009, 3:38 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
devildeac wrote:I invited Turk to join us here as he said he likes the weirdness of the LTE. He should add some additional humor and uniqueness should he decide to venture into crazietalk...
Cool beans!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 12:54 am
by Miles
Nine freaking hours? :-o

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 1:17 am
by Lavabe
Miles wrote:Nine freaking hours? :-o
<1 freaking hour. :-t

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 1:30 am
by Miles
Lavabe wrote:
Miles wrote:Nine freaking hours? :-o
<1 freaking hour. :-t
:!! (-| i-) :ymsigh:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 10:05 am
by bjornolf
I'm so confused. Where did the hour references come from? I looked back a page and I see no reference to 9 hours, or hours for that matter, anywhere.

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 11:06 am
by cl15876
bjornolf wrote:I'm so confused. Where did the hour references come from? I looked back a page and I see no reference to 9 hours, or hours for that matter, anywhere.

%%-
I actually was wondering the same thing the other day when I saw it. I figured it had to do with Miles returning back to San Diego and staying up until 4 in the morning posting. Am I close?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 12:54 pm
by Lavabe
cl15876 wrote:
bjornolf wrote:I'm so confused. Where did the hour references come from? I looked back a page and I see no reference to 9 hours, or hours for that matter, anywhere.

%%-
I actually was wondering the same thing the other day when I saw it. I figured it had to do with Miles returning back to San Diego and staying up until 4 in the morning posting. Am I close?
The post time of Miles was some 9 hours after the previous post on the LTE. :!! @-) :-w :ymsigh: (-| :ymtongue:

That is simply UNACCEPTABLE.

It would, however, be fine if it were on the TOBY. L-)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 2:16 pm
by Miles
Lavabe wrote:
cl15876 wrote:
bjornolf wrote:I'm so confused. Where did the hour references come from? I looked back a page and I see no reference to 9 hours, or hours for that matter, anywhere.

%%-
I actually was wondering the same thing the other day when I saw it. I figured it had to do with Miles returning back to San Diego and staying up until 4 in the morning posting. Am I close?
The post time of Miles was some 9 hours after the previous post on the LTE. :!! @-) :-w :ymsigh: (-| :ymtongue:

That is simply UNACCEPTABLE.

It would, however, be fine if it were on the TOBY. L-)
Lavabe nailed it!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 3:15 pm
by colchar
Lavabe wrote:
cl15876 wrote:
bjornolf wrote:I'm so confused. Where did the hour references come from? I looked back a page and I see no reference to 9 hours, or hours for that matter, anywhere.

%%-
I actually was wondering the same thing the other day when I saw it. I figured it had to do with Miles returning back to San Diego and staying up until 4 in the morning posting. Am I close?
The post time of Miles was some 9 hours after the previous post on the LTE. :!! @-) :-w :ymsigh: (-| :ymtongue:

That is simply UNACCEPTABLE.

It would, however, be fine if it were on the TOBY. L-)

So have we decided to go with TOBY?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 3:25 pm
by Sue71
colchar wrote:
Lavabe wrote:
cl15876 wrote:
I actually was wondering the same thing the other day when I saw it. I figured it had to do with Miles returning back to San Diego and staying up until 4 in the morning posting. Am I close?
The post time of Miles was some 9 hours after the previous post on the LTE. :!! @-) :-w :ymsigh: (-| :ymtongue:

That is simply UNACCEPTABLE.

It would, however, be fine if it were on the TOBY. L-)

So have we decided to go with TOBY?
My mom's friend's name is Toby. :ymsmug:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 3:32 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
We're (mostly) Duke graduates. We can do better than "TOBY". :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 4:23 pm
by Miles
I still say that TNNSNBNSNT OR TTNNNSNNNNNSNSNBT OR TNBNSTNSNSTNS will get the point across.
o-+ =:) \m/ :ymparty:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 5:14 pm
by colchar
I think TOS (That Other Site) or TOP (That Other Place) would be easiest for everyone.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 6:48 pm
by Sue71
Bored.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 7:20 pm
by YmoBeThere
Me too...

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 8:58 pm
by Sue71
I posted this on the LTE on TOB (or whatever acronym we're using now). Thought I'd post it here too just because it's from one of the greatest movies ever, and everyone should share in the awesomeness.

~~~Link~~~

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 9:38 pm
by wilson
OK, well here I am, back at home. I wanted to post here pretty much immediately upon registering, but I have these issyoos (as my illustrious, oh-so-British advisor would pronounce it) that won't allow me to post in the thread without first having read all of the posts in the thread. So I read this entire thread today (it took me two sittings).

I wanted to fling myself properly into this, the real LTE as far as I'm concerned, with something deliciously immature and iconoclastic, something along the lines of "Shit ass bitch damn fuck." But then Shammrog had to go and fuck it up around Page 19 (that asshole).

So now, I'm just sitting on my deck watching television (like I always say, TV is good, but TV outside is better) and attempting to take this nominal beer buzz somewhere north of "plenty safe enough to drive home from playing trivia," but south of "spins tonight, regret in the morning."

Hello, everyone. It's good to be where I belong.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 9:44 pm
by wilson
And yes, Windsor's daughter is quite a looker. Here's throwing my hat into that ring.
Perhaps she'd fancy a turn as my wench? :ar!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: April 30th, 2009, 10:37 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
catfound.jpg
Anybody lose a cat?