The body style is very similar to my 1972 GTO, but my (open, but non-functioal) GTO scoops were wider and close to the nose of the car. And I didn't have a convertible

Moderator: CameronBornAndBred
The body style is very similar to my 1972 GTO, but my (open, but non-functioal) GTO scoops were wider and close to the nose of the car. And I didn't have a convertible
Here's a couple of pictures of a blue 72 GTO, but the blue is "lighter" than Lucerne Blue, and my wheels were different than those on this car.OZZIE4DUKE wrote:The body style is very similar to my 1972 GTO, but my (open, but non-functioal) GTO scoops were wider and close to the nose of the car. And I didn't have a convertible
That is a SEXY car, however, I get turned OFF by this ride because IT DID NOT fair well when a school bus flipped over on IT back in the 70's, so I veered away from it. Sorta of like today's Dodge Rams (sexy but not something NOT to get behind the wheel of because of tranEE issues...........)wilson wrote:I want one of these.
Ever since I was a little kid, I've loved El Caminos. My dad, with whom I shared my car interest (and I guess from whom I got a lot of it), never got it. I mean, come on...they're ridiculous. But I still just love them. And a blue one with white racing stripes would make for one hell of an entrance to Duke tailgates, n'est-ce pas?
Speaking of school buses, I've always thought it'd be a hoot to get an old one, rip out the seats, and convert it into an RV/party wagon of sorts. I would definitely paint mine all psychedelic-like, too, a la the Electric Mayhem:cl15876 wrote:
That is a SEXY car, however, I get turned OFF by this ride because IT DID NOT fair well when a school bus flipped over on IT back in the 70's, so I veered away from it. Sorta of like today's Dodge Rams (sexy but not something NOT to get behind the wheel of because of tranEE issues...........)
But it's not any different than the Chevelle above...same chassis, powertrain, everything except sheet metal. Although I'm confused by your double negative...clarify?cl15876 wrote:That is a SEXY car, however, I get turned OFF by this ride because IT DID NOT fair well when a school bus flipped over on IT back in the 70's, so I veered away from it. Sorta of like today's Dodge Rams (sexy but not something NOT to get behind the wheel of because of tranEE issues...........)wilson wrote:I want one of these.
Ever since I was a little kid, I've loved El Caminos. My dad, with whom I shared my car interest (and I guess from whom I got a lot of it), never got it. I mean, come on...they're ridiculous. But I still just love them. And a blue one with white racing stripes would make for one hell of an entrance to Duke tailgates, n'est-ce pas?
Are you sure you didn't mean this?wilson wrote:Speaking of school buses, I've always thought it'd be a hoot to get an old one, rip out the seats, and convert it into an RV/party wagon of sorts. I would definitely paint mine all psychedelic-like, too, a la the Electric Mayhem:cl15876 wrote:
That is a SEXY car, however, I get turned OFF by this ride because IT DID NOT fair well when a school bus flipped over on IT back in the 70's, so I veered away from it. Sorta of like today's Dodge Rams (sexy but not something NOT to get behind the wheel of because of tranEE issues...........)
Yep, and may Animal eat Shirley Partridge's face.Sue71 wrote:
Are you sure you didn't mean this?
Sorry, left too many NOT's in that statement. Guess I AM wrapped tooo tight tonight! ;)wilson wrote:cl15876 wrote:But it's not any different than the Chevelle above...same chassis, powertrain, everything except sheet metal. Although I'm confused by your double negative...clarify?wilson wrote:I want one of these.
(sexy but not something NOT to get behind the wheel of because of tranEE issues...........)
So then my question remains: It's not any different than the Chevelle above...same chassis, powertrain, everything except sheet metal. What's the problem?cl15876 wrote:Sorry, left too many NOT's in that statement. Guess I AM wrapped tooo tight tonight! ;)wilson wrote:I want one of these.
![]()
I didn't like the flat truck style and ADDITIONALLY, two of my friends (identical twins) happened to be lovers of El Camino AND IN IT when the BUS tipped over on IT and THEM, so I have veered away from this one, because it didn't hold up well under the stress!wilson wrote:So then my question remains: It's not any different than the Chevelle above...same chassis, powertrain, everything except sheet metal. What's the problem?cl15876 wrote:Sorry, left too many NOT's in that statement. Guess I AM wrapped tooo tight tonight! ;)wilson wrote:I want one of these.
![]()
This past weekend I rode in a converted church bus that was converted into a party bus. They even installed a pole for dancing. The thing has a great (and huge) sound system and a 36" flat screen TV. They left the exterior a completely nondescript white, though, so as not to attract attention.wilson wrote:Speaking of school buses, I've always thought it'd be a hoot to get an old one, rip out the seats, and convert it into an RV/party wagon of sorts. I would definitely paint mine all psychedelic-like, too, a la the Electric Mayhem:cl15876 wrote:
That is a SEXY car, however, I get turned OFF by this ride because IT DID NOT fair well when a school bus flipped over on IT back in the 70's, so I veered away from it. Sorta of like today's Dodge Rams (sexy but not something NOT to get behind the wheel of because of tranEE issues...........)
I don't really think so. To bring this little sub-thread full circle, I'll point out that when Kermit and Fozzie first encountered the Electric Mayhem (and their bus), they were holding court in an old church.bjornolf wrote:A church bus? Really? Isn't that a little sacrilegious?Couldn't they have gotten an old prison bus or something? ;)