Page 193 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 12:46 am
by Bostondevil
The 'Lost' one.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 12:48 am
by Bostondevil
The Stray Cats were way underrated. I think it was because of their goofy music videos. Their music holds up today.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 2:04 am
by DevilAlumna
Bostondevil wrote:But we have Ozzie and wherever Ozzie goes, 9F is relevant.

Don't worry, George remains my one and only 'Get Out of Jail Free' card. I've just been watching so much 'Lost' that I've developped an appreciation for a shirtless Mr. Holloway. Have you been reading my thread on the DBR?
I confess, I have not. I enjoy the show, but frankly, am occasionally annoyed at what I perceive to be a lot of "work" required to understand it and all of its nuances. I want my TV to be a little more straightforward; I'm not willing to put in the effort for all the details. I'm glad you're enjoying it, tho, and it seems you've got a lot of followers!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 2:13 am
by Bostondevil
DevilAlumna wrote:
Bostondevil wrote:But we have Ozzie and wherever Ozzie goes, 9F is relevant.

Don't worry, George remains my one and only 'Get Out of Jail Free' card. I've just been watching so much 'Lost' that I've developped an appreciation for a shirtless Mr. Holloway. Have you been reading my thread on the DBR?
I confess, I have not. I enjoy the show, but frankly, am occasionally annoyed at what I perceive to be a lot of "work" required to understand it and all of its nuances. I want my TV to be a little more straightforward; I'm not willing to put in the effort for all the details. I'm glad you're enjoying it, tho, and it seems you've got a lot of followers!
You should read my thread. I've done all the work for you! Right Ozzie? Of course, I'm still on Season 2, but still. I hope to be caught up by the Season 6 premiere.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 7:35 am
by bjornolf
DevilAlumna wrote:At the risk of having three posts uninterrupted here (and thus looking like a PW):

I was wondering on the drive home, does 9F have relevance here?

I mean, it does come from the DBR Handy Pocket Reference.

I think here, GTH,C,GTH would pretty much be 1A.

Pirates are probably 1b, with lemurs 1c? :D
Hey, can I have a spot for my sig, %%- ? ;) I'm not greedy, I'll take like 117G, if it's available.

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 8:30 am
by devildeac
DevilAlumna wrote:Hey, I finally broke 300 posts. I'm like the anti-PW over here, in comparison to my DBR stats. (I've virtually stopped posting over there, and I'm still not falling very far in the ranks.)
And we are darned happy to have you here. :D I think I have posted about 30 times over there since CT started. As I have said before, just very little fun over there anymore.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 8:35 am
by devildeac
All this talk made me pull out my Brian Setzer CD last PM and play a few tunes. Darn good stuff.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 8:54 am
by Bostondevil
So who is reading the 'Lost' thread? Well, besides Ozzie and DukeUsul? There are almost 5000 views at this point. How many people would that be, do you think? I keep thinking there are like 5 guys reading it but I don't think 5 guys would generate 5000 views. I could be wrong.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 9:08 am
by DukeUsul
DevilAlumna wrote:I watched part of the Children of Dune DVD series with Mr. DA. It was interesting and visually appealing, but since I didn't know much of the story, I was really just digging a young, shirtless James McAvoy.
The Dune and Children of Dune miniseries on SciFi were definitely more true to the books. A good alternative to reading the book. If you watched Children of Dune without seeing Dune first, I'm not surprised you were confused. The stories are complicated in their own right, even in the right order.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 9:52 am
by bjornolf
Okay, I just had to put this up here, as a warning as well as a joke. Apparently, someone has invented a bikini that dissolves in water. So, if Shammrog offers any of you ladies free swimwear, I'd turn him down. ;) Same for you, BD, if it comes from Wilson.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... water.html


%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 9:58 am
by devildeac
bjornolf wrote:Okay, I just had to put this up here, as a warning as well as a joke. Apparently, someone has invented a bikini that dissolves in water. So, if Shammrog offers any of you ladies free swimwear, I'd turn him down. ;) Same for you, BD, if it comes from Wilson.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... water.html


%%-
Is that the publication that has the famous Page 3 model on a regular basis? :oops:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 10:02 am
by bjornolf
devildeac wrote:
bjornolf wrote:Okay, I just had to put this up here, as a warning as well as a joke. Apparently, someone has invented a bikini that dissolves in water. So, if Shammrog offers any of you ladies free swimwear, I'd turn him down. ;) Same for you, BD, if it comes from Wilson.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... water.html


%%-
Is that the publication that has the famous Page 3 model on a regular basis? :oops:
I have NO idea. A friend had it on their wall at facebook, and I just thought that dissolvable swimwear was such a weird idea. Who the heck would wear it except maybe somebody in a film of an adult nature? I mean, unless you were in private with only close friends, it would be FAR too cruel to use in a practical joke. That's just stepping WAY over the line.

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 10:04 am
by devildeac
bjornolf wrote:
devildeac wrote:
bjornolf wrote:Okay, I just had to put this up here, as a warning as well as a joke. Apparently, someone has invented a bikini that dissolves in water. So, if Shammrog offers any of you ladies free swimwear, I'd turn him down. ;) Same for you, BD, if it comes from Wilson.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... water.html


%%-
Is that the publication that has the famous Page 3 model on a regular basis? :oops:
I have NO idea. A friend had it on their wall at facebook, and I just thought that dissolvable swimwear was such a weird idea. Who the heck would wear it except maybe somebody in a film of an adult nature? I mean, unless you were in private with only close friends, it would be FAR too cruel to use in a practical joke. That's just stepping WAY over the line.

Agreed.

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 10:06 am
by DukePA
bjornolf wrote:Okay, I just had to put this up here, as a warning as well as a joke. Apparently, someone has invented a bikini that dissolves in water. So, if Shammrog offers any of you ladies free swimwear, I'd turn him down. ;) Same for you, BD, if it comes from Wilson.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... water.html


%%-
Ewww. blech. :-q

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 10:08 am
by bjornolf
DukePA wrote:
bjornolf wrote:Okay, I just had to put this up here, as a warning as well as a joke. Apparently, someone has invented a bikini that dissolves in water. So, if Shammrog offers any of you ladies free swimwear, I'd turn him down. ;) Same for you, BD, if it comes from Wilson.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... water.html


%%-
Ewww. blech. :-q
I get it, DukePA. That's what I'm wondering. What the heck is the point of it? I mean, I get the point of it, but what would the legitimate uses be?

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 10:09 am
by Shammrog
So are we doing naked Scrabble or what?!?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 10:11 am
by TillyGalore
bjornolf wrote:
DukePA wrote:
bjornolf wrote:Okay, I just had to put this up here, as a warning as well as a joke. Apparently, someone has invented a bikini that dissolves in water. So, if Shammrog offers any of you ladies free swimwear, I'd turn him down. ;) Same for you, BD, if it comes from Wilson.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... water.html


%%-
Ewww. blech. :-q
I get it, DukePA. That's what I'm wondering. What the heck is the point of it? I mean, I get the point of it, but what would the legitimate uses be?

%%-
Use your imagination, only think more on a small scale than a film.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 10:39 am
by TillyGalore
I was having a very lazy morning and stayed in bed much longer than I should have, though was less than 30 mins late to work. Any hoo! While hanging out in bed, a couple of kitties joined me, big surprise I know. Miss Moneypenny loves to get her face and head rubbed, and at one point actually had her head in my cupped hand. That is some serious trust there, and I certainly didn't do anything to break her trust in me. I love my kitties.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 10:49 am
by DevilAlumna
TillyGalore wrote:I was having a very lazy morning and stayed in bed much longer than I should have, though was less than 30 mins late to work. Any hoo! While hanging out in bed, a couple of kitties joined me, big surprise I know. Miss Moneypenny loves to get her face and head rubbed, and at one point actually had her head in my cupped hand. That is some serious trust there, and I certainly didn't do anything to break her trust in me. I love my kitties.
Yay for snuggly kitten mornings and sleeping in late! (Or, lazing in?) Sounds like a good start to a Friday.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 31st, 2009, 10:50 am
by TillyGalore
DevilAlumna wrote:
TillyGalore wrote:I was having a very lazy morning and stayed in bed much longer than I should have, though was less than 30 mins late to work. Any hoo! While hanging out in bed, a couple of kitties joined me, big surprise I know. Miss Moneypenny loves to get her face and head rubbed, and at one point actually had her head in my cupped hand. That is some serious trust there, and I certainly didn't do anything to break her trust in me. I love my kitties.
Yay for snuggly kitten mornings and sleeping in late! (Or, lazing in?) Sounds like a good start to a Friday.
Yay for snuggly animal mornings! :D :D :D