Page 1901 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 4th, 2015, 1:07 pm
by Very Duke Blue
I think my cousin, who lives in Texas, is coming for Thanksgiving. :happy-bouncyblue:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 4th, 2015, 1:09 pm
by Very Duke Blue
Go Panthers!! :-BD

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 9:57 am
by bjornolf
LGD! :duke: :duke:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 11:51 am
by devildeac
Best. Avatar. Ever. (from whereinthehellami OY)

Image

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 12:42 pm
by lawgrad91
Eating my leftover lasagna with a spork today. :9f:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 1:32 pm
by devildeac
Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 3:30 pm
by lawgrad91
devildeac wrote:Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.
I wondered if that person resided in one of the states where certain mind-altering substances are legal, and had over-partaken. :9f:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 4:13 pm
by devildeac
lawgrad91 wrote:
devildeac wrote:Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.
I wondered if that person resided in one of the states where certain mind-altering substances are legal, and had over-partaken. :9f:
Location for said poster not listed.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 4:37 pm
by windsor
devildeac wrote:Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.
You have posted OY for along time. How is possible that you even have to WONDER?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 4:40 pm
by lawgrad91
devildeac wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:
devildeac wrote:Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.
I wondered if that person resided in one of the states where certain mind-altering substances are legal, and had over-partaken. :9f:
Location for said poster not listed.
I noticed that. :9f:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 4:42 pm
by lawgrad91
devildeac wrote:Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.
So, were we less than competitive in any of those last three bowl games? :9f:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 6:04 pm
by devildeac
windsor wrote:
devildeac wrote:Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.
You have posted OY for along time. How is possible that you even have to WONDER?
Good point, but it's still incredulous to read such drivel as someone posting they hope Duke would lose a few unexpected games so we could win a bowl game. SMH.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 6:16 pm
by devildeac
lawgrad91 wrote:
devildeac wrote:Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.
So, were we less than competitive in any of those last three bowl games? :9f:
Hell, no. Fumbled away a win in the Belk Bowl. Intercepted on our last possession driving for the winning TD in the Peach Chicken Bowl. Ditto in the El Paso bowl. Sure a win or three woulda/shoulda been better but I still believe Cut has parlayed that, along with the # of Ws, a top 25 ranking and the Duke degree into a lot of national respect and better recruiting classes and facilities.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 8:19 pm
by Very Duke Blue
devildeac wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:
devildeac wrote:Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.
So, were we less than competitive in any of those last three bowl games? :9f:
Hell, no. Fumbled away a win in the Belk Bowl. Intercepted on our last possession driving for the winning TD in the Peach Chicken Bowl. Ditto in the El Paso bowl. Sure a win or three woulda/shoulda been better but I still believe Cut has parlayed that, along with the # of Ws, a top 25 ranking and the Duke degree into a lot of national respect and better recruiting classes and facilities.
:spork: :spork: :spork: :spork: :spork: for you, DD. :idea: :-BD

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 8:27 pm
by lawgrad91
devildeac wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:
devildeac wrote:Some low wattage bulb OY is hoping FB absorbs some unexpected losses so we don't enter a bowl game as massive underdogs. One must wonder if some folks even think before they hit the submit box for their post.
So, were we less than competitive in any of those last three bowl games? :9f:
Hell, no. Fumbled away a win in the Belk Bowl. Intercepted on our last possession driving for the winning TD in the Peach Chicken Bowl. Ditto in the El Paso bowl. Sure a win or three woulda/shoulda been better but I still believe Cut has parlayed that, along with the # of Ws, a top 25 ranking and the Duke degree into a lot of national respect and better recruiting classes and facilities.
Yup. Exactly. We belonged in every one of those games. Should have won them....So why should we play North Dakota State A&M Tech College in the Godforsaken Bowl?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 9:31 pm
by ArkieDukie
We should've beaten the Aggies. I'm still bitter about that game. Refs swallowed their whistles on multiple instances of blatant pass interference.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 9:52 pm
by devildeac
ArkieDukie wrote:We should've beaten the Aggies. I'm still bitter about that game. Refs swallowed their whistles on multiple instances of blatant pass interference.
That and the TD that the line judge (?) signaled with 10 seconds to go in the first half and then pulled his arms down and left the Duke sidelines, coaches and players totally confused. IIRC, that would have put us up 38-7 and I'm not even sure Johnny Asshole could have brought TAMU back from that deficit. X( X(

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 7:34 am
by YmoBeThere
Unfortunately, I work with many Aggies.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 7:39 am
by Very Duke Blue
YmoBeThere wrote:Unfortunately, I work with many Aggies.
You need a :ymhug:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 9:38 am
by lawgrad91
Very Duke Blue wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:Unfortunately, I work with many Aggies.
You need a :ymhug:
:ymhug: :ymhug: :wizard: :wizard: :wizard: