Page 20 of 32

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 2nd, 2018, 7:59 pm
by DukePA
lawgrad91 wrote:As I have mentioned before, Jethro is color-blind. His mama used to pick out his clothing; now his wife does.

Apparently there was trouble in Paradise last night. Jethro is at work today wearing pants that belong on a golf course. They are kind of a deep rose color. He is wearing a blue tie. The tie has polka dots. The polka dots are, well, orange. He looks like a pimp. :9f:
=)) =)) =)) =))
Bless his sartorial heart!

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 3rd, 2018, 9:47 am
by lawgrad91
CathyCA wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:As I have mentioned before, Jethro is color-blind. His mama used to pick out his clothing; now his wife does.

Apparently there was trouble in Paradise last night. Jethro is at work today wearing pants that belong on a golf course. They are kind of a deep rose color. He is wearing a blue tie. The tie has polka dots. The polka dots are, well, orange. He looks like a pimp. :9f:
:text-worthless:

Oh my gosh! Pictures, please!

:9f:
He was never in a place where I could get a picture without being obvious. He didn't have court (duh) and was mostly behind his desk micromanaging and creating more work for others. :9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 3rd, 2018, 10:10 am
by IowaDevil
lawgrad91 wrote:
CathyCA wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:As I have mentioned before, Jethro is color-blind. His mama used to pick out his clothing; now his wife does.

Apparently there was trouble in Paradise last night. Jethro is at work today wearing pants that belong on a golf course. They are kind of a deep rose color. He is wearing a blue tie. The tie has polka dots. The polka dots are, well, orange. He looks like a pimp. :9f:
:text-worthless:

Oh my gosh! Pictures, please!

:9f:
He was never in a place where I could get a picture without being obvious. He didn't have court (duh) and was mostly behind his desk micromanaging and creating more work for others. :9f:
=)) =)) =))

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 3rd, 2018, 10:22 am
by CathyCA
lawgrad91 wrote:
CathyCA wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:As I have mentioned before, Jethro is color-blind. His mama used to pick out his clothing; now his wife does.

Apparently there was trouble in Paradise last night. Jethro is at work today wearing pants that belong on a golf course. They are kind of a deep rose color. He is wearing a blue tie. The tie has polka dots. The polka dots are, well, orange. He looks like a pimp. :9f:
:text-worthless:

Oh my gosh! Pictures, please!

:9f:
He was never in a place where I could get a picture without being obvious. He didn't have court (duh) and was mostly behind his desk micromanaging and creating more work for others. :9f:
:sigh: Sigh. :sigh:

:9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 4th, 2018, 10:09 am
by lawgrad91
I have a bond hearing on a man charged with failing to register as a sex offender.

His witness is named “Mr. Humpy.” :-o :9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 4th, 2018, 2:16 pm
by CathyCA
lawgrad91 wrote:I have a bond hearing on a man charged with failing to register as a sex offender.

His witness is named “Mr. Humpy.” :-o :9f:
For reals?

:9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 5th, 2018, 6:49 am
by Bob Green
lawgrad91 wrote:His witness is named “Mr. Humpy.” :-o :9f:
Evidence this thread is aptly named. :D

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 9th, 2018, 2:26 pm
by lawgrad91
A probationer would be best suited by not posting on his Facebook page: “F*cc the judge n my PO.” :9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 10th, 2018, 10:51 am
by CathyCA
lawgrad91 wrote:A probationer would be best suited by not posting on his Facebook page: “F*cc the judge n my PO.” :9f:
=)) :ymdevil:

:9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 15th, 2018, 11:24 am
by Ima Facultiwyfe
I gotta show up and read this thread more often. =)) Catching up on all of this at once is just too hard on my aching sides!!! =))
Love, Ima

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 22nd, 2018, 10:08 am
by lawgrad91
https://pilotonline.com/news/nation-wor ... 5f351.html

Not a spellcheck error, but still funny nonetheless. :9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 22nd, 2018, 10:12 am
by DukieInKansas
lawgrad91 wrote:https://pilotonline.com/news/nation-wor ... 5f351.html

Not a spellcheck error, but still funny nonetheless. :9f:
Who is going to test their algorithm and see if GTH, C, GTH! passes the test? :D

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 22nd, 2018, 5:30 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
DukieInKansas wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:https://pilotonline.com/news/nation-wor ... 5f351.html

Not a spellcheck error, but still funny nonetheless. :9f:
Who is going to test their algorithm and see if GTH, C, GTH! passes the test? :D
Now that’s a very tempting idea! GTHc! :9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 22nd, 2018, 6:33 pm
by Bob Green
lawgrad91 wrote:https://pilotonline.com/news/nation-wor ... 5f351.html

Not a spellcheck error, but still funny nonetheless. :9f:
I just came here to post a link to the same article. That is hilarious. =))

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 23rd, 2018, 3:23 pm
by lawgrad91
Exhibit 864 in why a person shouldn’t use big words if he/she doesn’t know which big word he/she means.

Found in our case management system: “...Both defendants waived preliminary hearing in exchange for these matters being handled as...misdemeanors...in the circuit court with a small active amount of jail time COMMISERATE therewith.”

Commiserate means to feel sympathy for. Jethro means COMMENSURATE.

(I cleaned up his subject-verb agreement, too.) :-B :9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 24th, 2018, 10:26 am
by CathyCA
lawgrad91 wrote:https://pilotonline.com/news/nation-wor ... 5f351.html

Not a spellcheck error, but still funny nonetheless. :9f:
As my son-in-law pointed out to me, something like this would ONLY happen in South Carolina. :occasion-cake:

:9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 24th, 2018, 10:33 am
by CathyCA
lawgrad91 wrote:Exhibit 864 in why a person shouldn’t use big words if he/she doesn’t know which big word he/she means.

Found in our case management system: “...Both defendants waived preliminary hearing in exchange for these matters being handled as...misdemeanors...in the circuit court with a small active amount of jail time COMMISERATE therewith.”

Commiserate means to feel sympathy for. Jethro means COMMENSURATE.

(I cleaned up his subject-verb agreement, too.) :-B :9f:
In law school, my business drafting professor told us that we should never use big words unless we know exactly what they mean. So, we had an opportunity to draft a business contract. There, on the first page of his draft, one of my classmates used the term, "WITNESSETH." The professor flashed this contract up on the big screen (in the days of overhead projectors) and asked my classmate, "What does 'witnesseth' mean?" My classmate stammered a bit and admitted that he didn't know what it meant, but that it sounded like a good legal term to throw in a contract.

"Take it out of the contract, and the contract still means the same thing," our professor said.

A few months later, while sitting for the bar exam in Raleigh, the silence of the test was broken by muffled giggles. I looked up and saw that classmate shaking his head and muttering, "Witnesseth." The word was included in a fact pattern on our bar exam. (It didn't add to or take away from the fact pattern, but still. . . )

:9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: May 24th, 2018, 10:38 am
by lawgrad91
CathyCA wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:Exhibit 864 in why a person shouldn’t use big words if he/she doesn’t know which big word he/she means.

Found in our case management system: “...Both defendants waived preliminary hearing in exchange for these matters being handled as...misdemeanors...in the circuit court with a small active amount of jail time COMMISERATE therewith.”

Commiserate means to feel sympathy for. Jethro means COMMENSURATE.

(I cleaned up his subject-verb agreement, too.) :-B :9f:
In law school, my business drafting professor told us that we should never use big words unless we know exactly what they mean. So, we had an opportunity to draft a business contract. There, on the first page of his draft, one of my classmates used the term, "WITNESSETH." The professor flashed this contract up on the big screen (in the days of overhead projectors) and asked my classmate, "What does 'witnesseth' mean?" My classmate stammered a bit and admitted that he didn't know what it meant, but that it sounded like a good legal term to throw in a contract.

"Take it out of the contract, and the contract still means the same thing," our professor said.

A few months later, while sitting for the bar exam in Raleigh, the silence of the test was broken by muffled giggles. I looked up and saw that classmate shaking his head and muttering, "Witnesseth." The word was included in a fact pattern on our bar exam. (It didn't add to or take away from the fact pattern, but still. . . )

:9f:
Hehehe....

The portion I changed stated that the defendants waived preliminary hearing in exchange for these matters being handled as "a misdemeanor." Which begs the question: if two defendants are sharing one misdemeanor, does that mean there's only half the possible punishment? :9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: June 4th, 2018, 4:55 pm
by lawgrad91
Has anyone here ever pulled a muscle in his/her tongue? :9f:

Re: You can't make this stuff up!

Posted: June 4th, 2018, 9:45 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
lawgrad91 wrote:Has anyone here ever pulled a muscle in his/her tongue? :9f:
No, I keep mine we’ll exercised and stretched out! ;) :9f: