-=OUR HOUSE=- A Forum for Fans of Duke Sports
https://crazietalk.net/ourhouse/
lawgrad91 wrote:Today's OY ad is Divers' Institute of Technology in Seattle.
I could do the Washington winery crawl and go visit DukeAlumna. I could also spend quality time with my inlaws, but the winery crawl would be a lot more fun.
Who's with me (on the winery crawl, not the inlaw visit)?
Where's the 'like' button?windsor wrote:lawgrad91 wrote:Today's OY ad is Divers' Institute of Technology in Seattle.
I could do the Washington winery crawl and go visit DukeAlumna. I could also spend quality time with my inlaws, but the winery crawl would be a lot more fun.
Who's with me (on the winery crawl, not the inlaw visit)?
Did someone say wine?? yes to wine no to in laws
Sign me up!lawgrad91 wrote:Today's OY ad is Divers' Institute of Technology in Seattle.
I could do the Washington winery crawl and go visit DukeAlumna. I could also spend quality time with my inlaws, but the winery crawl would be a lot more fun.
Who's with me (on the winery crawl, not the inlaw visit)?
I don't drink wine but am sure there is a beer in the vicinity - count me in! and Hip, Hip Hurrah on the moving step! Quiet on the LawGrad front is restored!lawgrad91 wrote:Today's OY ad is Divers' Institute of Technology in Seattle.
I could do the Washington winery crawl and go visit DukeAlumna. I could also spend quality time with my inlaws, but the winery crawl would be a lot more fun.
Who's with me (on the winery crawl, not the inlaw visit)?
ID, we could definitely find you beer.IowaDevil wrote:I don't drink wine but am sure there is a beer in the vicinity - count me in! and Hip, Hip Hurrah on the moving step! Quiet on the LawGrad front is restored!lawgrad91 wrote:Today's OY ad is Divers' Institute of Technology in Seattle.
I could do the Washington winery crawl and go visit DukeAlumna. I could also spend quality time with my inlaws, but the winery crawl would be a lot more fun.
Who's with me (on the winery crawl, not the inlaw visit)?
CathyCA wrote:Yay for stepdaughter's leaving the nest!
It's like watching a car wreck. You don't want to look, but you can't help yourself.CathyCA wrote:I don't know why I even peek.
lawgrad91 wrote:It's like watching a car wreck. You don't want to look, but you can't help yourself.CathyCA wrote:I don't know why I even peek.
Yeah, same here.windsor wrote:lawgrad91 wrote:It's like watching a car wreck. You don't want to look, but you can't help yourself.CathyCA wrote:I don't know why I even peek.
Guilty. Damn it.
Agreed. It was a good night to not have any names on the jerseys.YmoBeThere wrote:Tonight's result can be pinned on the guy who wears Blue Devils on the back of his jersey. He had some good plays but overall got outplayed.
Perhaps the only worse fashion move that I can recall was the night of the green t-shirts.CameronBornAndBred wrote:Agreed. It was a good night to not have any names on the jerseys.YmoBeThere wrote:Tonight's result can be pinned on the guy who wears Blue Devils on the back of his jersey. He had some good plays but overall got outplayed.
Thanks, all, for confirming my decision to ignore. I've been tempted to peek and have not done so. If my sisters say to do so, it must be true.DukePA wrote:Must USE the ignore button. The brain rattling ignorance is horrifying.
Last year's special Nike unis were worse. They looked gack blue, blue remember? These were beautiful by comparison.Lavabe wrote:Perhaps the only worse fashion move that I can recall was the night of the green t-shirts.CameronBornAndBred wrote:Agreed. It was a good night to not have any names on the jerseys.YmoBeThere wrote:Tonight's result can be pinned on the guy who wears Blue Devils on the back of his jersey. He had some good plays but overall got outplayed.