Page 156 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 3:26 pm
by bjornolf
Oh, you meant a boat skipper. Sorry, my bad. Carry on, then.

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 3:27 pm
by bjornolf
You added that as an edit just to freak me out, didn't you? Cause I didn't see that picture the first time I looked. Well played, my man, well played. I salute you.

%%-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 3:34 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
bjornolf wrote:You added that as an edit just to freak me out, didn't you? Cause I didn't see that picture the first time I looked. Well played, my man, well played. I salute you.

%%-
LOL..took me a minute to find the picture. :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 4:12 pm
by wilson
I registered for CT about three weeks after it went live, so I missed a lot of the LTE's early material (~50 pages' worth). I am proud to say, however, that I did not allow myself to post in LTE 2.0 until I had read every post. It took me two sittings, and I don't even want to know how much time I spent on the task. :roll:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 4:55 pm
by devildeac
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
bjornolf wrote:You added that as an edit just to freak me out, didn't you? Cause I didn't see that picture the first time I looked. Well played, my man, well played. I salute you.

%%-
LOL..took me a minute to find the picture. :D

what picture? :-o :?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 5:02 pm
by wilson
devildeac wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
bjornolf wrote:You added that as an edit just to freak me out, didn't you? Cause I didn't see that picture the first time I looked. Well played, my man, well played. I salute you.

%%-
LOL..took me a minute to find the picture. :D

what picture? :-o :?
I'm confused. :-o
On my computer, it showed up like this:
skipper.JPG

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 5:04 pm
by devildeac
%%-[/quote]
LOL..took me a minute to find the picture. :D[/quote]


what picture? :-o :?[/quote]
I'm confused. :-o
On my computer, it showed up like this:
skipper.JPG
[/quote]

I could not find it/link it from my PC.

Strange.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 5:18 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
wilson wrote:
devildeac wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote: LOL..took me a minute to find the picture. :D

what picture? :-o :?
I'm confused. :-o
On my computer, it showed up like this:
skipper.JPG
Gilligan might have been a little more manly if he had YOUR skipper.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 5:20 pm
by CathyCA
I had a Skipper doll, but I was always confused why they gave Barbie's little sister a guy's name.

As a GRITS (Girl Raised In The South), I knew lots of men and boys named "Skipper" or "Skip," but I never knew any girls who had that name.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 5:21 pm
by wilson
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
wilson wrote: I'm confused. :-o
On my computer, it showed up like this:
skipper.JPG
Gilligan might have been a little more manly if he had YOUR skipper.
...or he might have been in a jail with bamboo bars or something. Isn't Skipper perpetually, like 11 years old? :o

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 5:22 pm
by wilson
CathyCA wrote:I had a Skipper doll, but I was always confused why they gave Barbie's little sister a guy's name.

As a GRITS (Girl Raised In The South), I knew lots of men and boys named "Skipper" or "Skip," but I never knew any girls who had that name.
There's a great Chicago-style hot dog joint in Atlanta (well, actually Decatur) called Skip's.
My mouth is now watering.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 5:29 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
It appears my original photo no longer links correctly, so strange. I'm going to go back in time and edit it.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 6:27 pm
by devildeac
CameronBornAndBred wrote:It appears my original photo no longer links correctly, so strange. I'm going to go back in time and edit it.
No wonder I was :-o :?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 7:14 pm
by YmoBeThere
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:I'm not sure there are any other movies I want to go see this summer, I've already seen Angels and Demons and The Hangover.
Harry Potter is the one I'm waiting for. I'm not heard of any others that have me interested.
Yes, good call...I will go to see that one also.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 7:15 pm
by YmoBeThere
CameronBornAndBred wrote:I'm going to go back in time and edit it.
There are a couple decisions that I've made that makes sense to adjust. Can you go bank in time and edit those also?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 7:23 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
YmoBeThere wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:I'm going to go back in time and edit it.
There are a couple decisions that I've made that makes sense to adjust. Can you go bank in time and edit those also?
Maybe I already have, yet the different decision you made had no effect on the final result.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 10:08 pm
by Lavabe
wilson wrote:I registered for CT about three weeks after it went live, so I missed a lot of the LTE's early material (~50 pages' worth). I am proud to say, however, that I did not allow myself to post in LTE 2.0 until I had read every post. It took me two sittings, and I don't even want to know how much time I spent on the task. :roll:
At least one of us here doesn't have the connection quality and speed to perform a similar task. ;)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 10:34 pm
by DukePA
You people are crazie and that's why I looove ya'll :D Let's get drunk!!!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 11:13 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
DukePA wrote:You people are crazie and that's why I looove ya'll :D Let's get drunk!!!
:ymhug: :ymhug: :ymhug:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: July 13th, 2009, 11:15 pm
by devildeac
DukePA wrote:You people are crazie and that's why I looove ya'll :D Let's get drunk!!!
I believe the proper expression would be: "why don't we get drunk and _ _ _ _ _" :oops: :))