crazietalk.net

lawgrad91 wrote:I have 88 reputation points and only one pitchfork. The last positive comment only upped me 4 points. I guess the first positive comment gets more reputation points than the the next, and so forth.

Meh. Who the hell knows how it's done....

Would you like us to help you "up yours" OY?

CathyCA wrote:

lawgrad91 wrote:I have 88 reputation points and only one pitchfork. The last positive comment only upped me 4 points. I guess the first positive comment gets more reputation points than the the next, and so forth.

Meh. Who the hell knows how it's done....

Would you like us to help you "up yours" OY?

OY vei!

CathyCA wrote:

lawgrad91 wrote:I have 88 reputation points and only one pitchfork. The last positive comment only upped me 4 points. I guess the first positive comment gets more reputation points than the the next, and so forth.

Meh. Who the hell knows how it's done....

Would you like us to help you "up yours" OY?

CameronBornAndBred wrote:

CathyCA wrote:Would you like us to help you "up yours" OY?

Dude... I've just spent the last few minutes cleaning my laptop screen from the spit-take I had after looking at your post.

CathyCA wrote:

lawgrad91 wrote:I have 88 reputation points and only one pitchfork. The last positive comment only upped me 4 points. I guess the first positive comment gets more reputation points than the the next, and so forth.

Meh. Who the hell knows how it's done....

Would you like us to help you "up yours" OY?

Still nothing going on over there. An inane discussion about sixth-grade English on the Sean Renfree thread, which seems a bit off-topic. I assume he left sixth-grade English behind some years ago. And a long inane conversation about Brandon Cornette, whoever he is. (Thanks CB&B for posting the correct spelling. )

lawgrad91 wrote:Still nothing going on over there. An inane discussion about sixth-grade English on the Sean Renfree thread, which seems a bit off-topic. I assume he left sixth-grade English behind some years ago. And a long inane conversation about Brandon Cornette, whoever he is. (Thanks CB&B for posting the correct spelling. )

Brandon Cornette is one our .25backs. I think he may be better than Sean Renfree.

TillyGalore wrote:

lawgrad91 wrote:Still nothing going on over there. An inane discussion about sixth-grade English on the Sean Renfree thread, which seems a bit off-topic. I assume he left sixth-grade English behind some years ago. And a long inane conversation about Brandon Cornette, whoever he is. (Thanks CB&B for posting the correct spelling. )

Brandon Cornette is one our .25backs. I think he may be better than Sean Renfree.

Our QB is Connette, not Cornette, despite the people OY trying to change his name. He is supposed to be very talented.

I'm so looking forward to football season.

Lavabe wrote: I finally was able to add a comment to someone, Ozzie. Does that give Ozzie more reputation points? It's not very well laid out.

Otherwise, I found nothing of interest over yonder, except that it looks like rthomas has said good-bye to over yonder.

THAT is sad.

Thanks, Lavabe. I went from 77 to 95 points, but still only one spork

OZZIE4DUKE wrote:

Lavabe wrote: I finally was able to add a comment to someone, Ozzie. Does that give Ozzie more reputation points? It's not very well laid out.

Otherwise, I found nothing of interest over yonder, except that it looks like rthomas has said good-bye to over yonder.

THAT is sad.

Thanks, Lavabe. I went from 77 to 95 points, but still only one spork

It still won't let me give you more points, Ozzie, so sporks here are the best I can do.

OZZIE4DUKE wrote:

Lavabe wrote: I finally was able to add a comment to someone, Ozzie. Does that give Ozzie more reputation points? It's not very well laid out.

Otherwise, I found nothing of interest over yonder, except that it looks like rthomas has said good-bye to over yonder.

THAT is sad.

Thanks, Lavabe. I went from 77 to 95 points, but still only one spork

I think I went up 3 ponts today. Just don't post enough for many more folks to up my whatever...

lawgrad91 wrote:I have 88 reputation points and only one pitchfork. The last positive comment only upped me 4 points. I guess the first positive comment gets more reputation points than the the next, and so forth.

Meh. Who the hell knows how it's done....

I have a new theory that we add to our reputation points when we give reputation points.

lawgrad91 wrote:I have 88 reputation points and only one pitchfork. The last positive comment only upped me 4 points. I guess the first positive comment gets more reputation points than the the next, and so forth.

Meh. Who the hell knows how it's done....

My reputation timeout just ended and I hit you with a positive comment. Hope that gets you a little closer to another pitchfork. Still can't give rep to any of the other CTN users without the spread it around message. I've been spreading it around already! That rep system is impossible to decipher.

ArkieDukie wrote:

lawgrad91 wrote:I have 88 reputation points and only one pitchfork. The last positive comment only upped me 4 points. I guess the first positive comment gets more reputation points than the the next, and so forth.

Meh. Who the hell knows how it's done....

I have a new theory that we add to our reputation points when we give reputation points.

Don't know about that. I had some points before I gave any.

lawgrad91 wrote: Our QB is Connette, not Cornette, despite the people OY trying to change his name.

And this from the board on which people would regularly freak the fuck out if anyone accidentally misspelled the name of a certain basketball player from a couple of years back.

Mph, thanks! Still just one spork but that is ok.

Colchar, they still go apeshit nuts in the basketball spelling department. There is an entire page on one thread over the proper spelling of Tyler Thornton's last name.

lawgrad91 wrote:Mph, thanks! Still just one spork but that is ok.

Colchar, they still go apeshit nuts in the basketball spelling department. There is an entire page on one thread over the proper spelling of Tyler Thornton's last name.

There is no reason not to spell Shelden and/or Redick correctly. Or Krzyzewski, for that matter. There, or here!

OZZIE4DUKE wrote:

lawgrad91 wrote:Mph, thanks! Still just one spork but that is ok.

Colchar, they still go apeshit nuts in the basketball spelling department. There is an entire page on one thread over the proper spelling of Tyler Thornton's last name.

There is no reason not to spell Shelden and/or Redick correctly. Or Krzyzewski, for that matter. There, or here!

It seemed that half of the Tyler Thornton spelling extravaganza involved fussing about how people used to misspell Shelden and Redick. And there was some stuff thrown in about Thornton Wilder. Talk about

I'm still in reputation timeout OY.

colchar wrote:

lawgrad91 wrote: Our QB is Connette, not Cornette, despite the people OY trying to change his name.

And this from the board on which people would regularly freak the fuck out if anyone accidentally misspelled the name of a certain basketball player from a couple of years back.

I think they still freak out OY when someone reports that Nick Horvath scores 40 in a pick-up game.

We all SHOULD be able to spell Redick, Shelden and Krzyzewski correctly.... but some people over there get there undies in way too tight of a bundle when people mess it up. Lighten up, Francis.

Woohoo! I now have 104 reputation points and 2 pitchforks OY! Almost in the heady area of CB&B!

Thanks everybody!