Page 1302 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 12:28 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
My boss ordered a printer part for a client, assuming it was going to be an easy install. I'm guessing it will take me three hours to take apart and put back together, and then another hour to figure out where the left over screws are supposed to go. Sigh.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 12:53 pm
by Very Duke Blue
CameronBornAndBred wrote:My boss ordered a printer part for a client, assuming it was going to be an easy install. I'm guessing it will take me three hours to take apart and put back together, and then another hour to figure out where the left over screws are supposed to go. Sigh.
=)) =))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 12:55 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
CameronBornAndBred wrote:My boss ordered a printer part for a client, assuming it was going to be an easy install. I'm guessing it will take me three hours to take apart and put back together, and then another hour to figure out where the left over screws are supposed to go. Sigh.
And the 3 hour labor charge plus the part cost is cheaper than buying a new printer? I think not! Unless it's one helluva big printer...

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:05 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:My boss ordered a printer part for a client, assuming it was going to be an easy install. I'm guessing it will take me three hours to take apart and put back together, and then another hour to figure out where the left over screws are supposed to go. Sigh.
And the 3 hour labor charge plus the part cost is cheaper than buying a new printer? I think not! Unless it's one helluva big printer...
It's one helluva big printer. Even refurbished it would cost over $1000. I'm ready for a beer.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:11 pm
by devildeac
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:My boss ordered a printer part for a client, assuming it was going to be an easy install. I'm guessing it will take me three hours to take apart and put back together, and then another hour to figure out where the left over screws are supposed to go. Sigh.
And the 3 hour labor charge plus the part cost is cheaper than buying a new printer? I think not! Unless it's one helluva big printer...
It's one helluva big printer. Even refurbished it would cost over $1000. I'm ready for a beer.
Which one?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:23 pm
by Very Duke Blue
3500 post for me. :happy-bouncyblue: :duke:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:24 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
Laserjet 4250.
If anyone ever wants to replace a swing plate assembly for one, here's the instructions. Need for patience required, but it's not included with the replacement part. Neither is the beer. Good thing it's Friday.
Printer is back together, miraculously it worked the first time, no screws left over. :happy-bouncyblue:

http://www.erchi.com/hp_sides/oars/DISK ... 31056.html

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:25 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
Very Duke Blue wrote:3500 post for me. :happy-bouncyblue: :duke:
:ymapplause: :ymapplause: :ymapplause: :ymapplause: :-BD :happy-bouncyblue:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:27 pm
by lawgrad91
Very Duke Blue wrote:3500 post for me. :happy-bouncyblue: :duke:
Congratulations! :clap: :-BD ^:)^

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:29 pm
by Very Duke Blue
lawgrad91 wrote:
Very Duke Blue wrote:3500 post for me. :happy-bouncyblue: :duke:
Congratulations! :clap: :-BD ^:)^
Thank you. :)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:29 pm
by lawgrad91
We are awaiting the arrival of a crazy man to see the PHB and the head victim-witness coordinator. He said that he would kill himself if he didn't get his $2000 restitution by today. I hope he doesn't plan to kill himself in the office. That could be messy.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:31 pm
by Very Duke Blue
lawgrad91 wrote:We are awaiting the arrival of a crazy man to see the PHB and the head victim-witness coordinator. He said that he would kill himself if he didn't get his $2000 restitution by today. I hope he doesn't plan to kill himself in the office. That could be messy.
Go out for a long lunch..... :))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 1:40 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Laserjet 4250.
If anyone ever wants to replace a swing plate assembly for one, here's the instructions. Need for patience required, but it's not included with the replacement part. Neither is the beer. Good thing it's Friday.
Printer is back together, miraculously it worked the first time, no screws left over. :happy-bouncyblue:

http://www.erchi.com/hp_sides/oars/DISK ... 31056.html
Obviously, it's the talent of the technician doing the work! :D B-) :ymparty: :9f:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 6:12 pm
by Very Duke Blue
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
Very Duke Blue wrote:3500 post for me. :happy-bouncyblue: :duke:
:ymapplause: :ymapplause: :ymapplause: :ymapplause: :-BD :happy-bouncyblue:
Thank you. :) :happy-bouncyblue:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 7th, 2011, 7:23 pm
by ArkieDukie
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:My boss ordered a printer part for a client, assuming it was going to be an easy install. I'm guessing it will take me three hours to take apart and put back together, and then another hour to figure out where the left over screws are supposed to go. Sigh.
And the 3 hour labor charge plus the part cost is cheaper than buying a new printer? I think not! Unless it's one helluva big printer...
It's one helluva big printer. Even refurbished it would cost over $1000. I'm ready for a beer.
Would you settle for a Bud Light? :ymdevil:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 8th, 2011, 12:06 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
OneInTheBushMed.jpg
One In The Bush

:happy-bouncyblue: :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 8th, 2011, 12:34 pm
by captmojo
That makes me cold to look at it. :D
Well done.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 8th, 2011, 12:44 pm
by indoor66
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
OneInTheBushMed.jpg
One In The Bush

:happy-bouncyblue: :D
Isn't that supposed to be two? Very nice as is.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 8th, 2011, 12:52 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
indoor66 wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
OneInTheBushMed.jpg
One In The Bush

:happy-bouncyblue: :D
Isn't that supposed to be two? Very nice as is.
It's supposed to be two, but the other one kept flying away. :))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: January 8th, 2011, 12:53 pm
by CathyCA
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
OneInTheBushMed.jpg
One In The Bush

:happy-bouncyblue: :D
Beautiful!