Page 1243 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 19th, 2010, 8:23 pm
by captmojo
devildeac wrote:
DukieInKansas wrote:
There is actually an explanation - I'm doing some things for my brother and this is a thank you gift. The result is that I have some nice wine to enjoy. I see a party in my future.
And 20-30 of us at CTN see a road trip in our future. :)) =))
I'll have to stay home 'cause...
Rent is too damn high! :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 19th, 2010, 8:24 pm
by captmojo
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
RnVjaw== 01000110 01110101 01100011 01101011 46 75 63 6b 70 117 99 107
I was going to post that in the AL Playoffs thread on another site, but with 3 points already I didn't want to to get into more trouble. They just don't have a sense of humor...
But they're...
Rent is too damn high! :))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 19th, 2010, 8:26 pm
by captmojo
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
RnVjaw== 01000110 01110101 01100011 01101011 46 75 63 6b 70 117 99 107
I was going to post that in the AL Playoffs thread on another site, but with 3 points already I didn't want to to get into more trouble. They just don't have a sense of humor...
What's 3 more points?
Rent is too damn high! :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 19th, 2010, 8:31 pm
by captmojo
colchar wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:
colchar wrote:I think the networks also had a major bidding war for this show when it was first conceived and the high cost paid for it was also factored into the per episode cost which, when added to the salaries, made the cost even higher.

Personally, I am pissed that A) they dumped J.J. (A.J. Cook) from Criminal Minds and seem to be squeezing Prentice (Paget Brewster) out a bit as she has been forced to accept a reduced role while all of this seems geared toward saving money on the original and putting it into the spinoff; B) that they got rid of the original Law & order in favour of the cheaper Law & Order: Los Angeles spinoff and have yet to cancel the abysmal Law & Order: Criminal Intent - if they had wanted to save money they should've canceled that one; and C) that Raising the Bar was canceled as I was really enjoying that show.

And yet, they continue to feed people an unending diet of crappy reality shows simply because they are cheaper to produce. If only people would refuse to be sucked in and stop watching them, maybe we could get some decent shows back on TV. I won't hold my breath though.
Colchar, I think we must have similar taste in television shows. The firing of A.J. Cook was disgraceful, as is the diminshed role of Paget Brewster. Especially when this is juxtaposed with the ridiculously high salary that Charlie Sheen is being paid. And I refuse to watch any of the reality TV shows.

I'm not so concerned about Sheen's salary as his show has consistently been one of the highest ranked comedies on television. What bugs me is that the network got rid of A.J. and is marginalizing Paget simply as a cost cutting measure. They are trying to cut costs on the original while putting out a spin-off that I don't think is going to be anywhere near as good. Despite the high salary that Whittaker will command for that show, the rest of the actors won't make much so they will be saving money. But that spin-off won't last long so they are kind of shooting themselves in the foot and are screwing up the entire franchise in the process. Criminal Minds is a great show but I am convinced they are going to screw it up entirely. I'm also hoping they don't bring back any 'super criminals who cannot be stopped' storylines (like the one involving Gideon and the other one about the guy who killed Hotch's ex-wife) as I find them to be ridiculously stupid. Personally, I think those storylines detract from an otherwise well written show.

They canned the more expensive original Law & Order in favour of the L.A. based one that is nowhere near as good (and that I don't think will last more than a season or two). To me, this was done as a cost cutting measure but, in doing so, they have messed up the franchise. I can see Criminal Minds heading down the exact same path.
I don't know much about Law and Order but I do know that...
Rent is too damn high! =)) =)) =))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 7:53 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
RnVjaw== 01000110 01110101 01100011 01101011 46 75 63 6b 70 117 99 107
I was going to post that in the AL Playoffs thread on another site, but with 3 points already I didn't want to to get into more trouble. They just don't have a sense of humor...
Last night I did post
Quote Originally Posted by OZZIE4DUKE View Post
70 117 99 107 32 66 101 110 106 105 32 77 111 108 105 110 97
And a moderator asked:
Ok, for the uninitiated, this sequence of numbers is.....?
No, I'm not going to tell him/her.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 9:42 am
by devildeac
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
RnVjaw== 01000110 01110101 01100011 01101011 46 75 63 6b 70 117 99 107
I was going to post that in the AL Playoffs thread on another site, but with 3 points already I didn't want to to get into more trouble. They just don't have a sense of humor...
Last night I did post
Quote Originally Posted by OZZIE4DUKE View Post
70 117 99 107 32 66 101 110 106 105 32 77 111 108 105 110 97
And a moderator asked:
Ok, for the uninitiated, this sequence of numbers is.....?
No, I'm not going to tell him/her.
Aww, go ahead and tell her/him and ask for your infraction points in binary or some other system. :)) =))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 1:35 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
devildeac wrote:
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
RnVjaw== 01000110 01110101 01100011 01101011 46 75 63 6b 70 117 99 107
I was going to post that in the AL Playoffs thread on another site, but with 3 points already I didn't want to to get into more trouble. They just don't have a sense of humor...
Last night I did post
Quote Originally Posted by OZZIE4DUKE View Post
70 117 99 107 32 66 101 110 106 105 32 77 111 108 105 110 97
And a moderator asked:
Ok, for the uninitiated, this sequence of numbers is.....?
No, I'm not going to tell him/her.
Aww, go ahead and tell her/him and ask for your infraction points in binary or some other system. :)) =))
Nah. Jason told 'em.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 1:42 pm
by CathyCA
My client called me "sweetie" today. I had to leave the courthouse and go SCRUB the germs off my hands. I still feel the need to vomit.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 5:00 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
Photo I took at the chinese restaurant I ate at today.
:-?

Image

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 5:12 pm
by devildeac
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Photo I took at the chinese restaurant I ate at today.
:-?

Image
.egnartS

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 5:45 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
My friend Melanie works in the lemur center, she posted some pics today.

Image

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 7:01 pm
by lawgrad91
CameronBornAndBred wrote:My friend Melanie works in the lemur center, she posted some pics today.

Image

Awww... :ymhug:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 8:24 pm
by ArkieDukie
An eye clinic in Fayetteville, AR (home of the U of A) is offering free lasik surgery for the referees from last weekend's Arkansas-Auburn football game. =))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 8:35 pm
by captmojo
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Photo I took at the chinese restaurant I ate at today.
:-?

Image
They should have written 'Men', backward in Mandarin.

It would make an interesting painting. :idea:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 8:38 pm
by devildeac
ArkieDukie wrote:An eye clinic in Fayetteville, AR (home of the U of A) is offering free lasik surgery for the referees from last weekend's Arkansas-Auburn football game. =))
That's just too damn funny.

Wonder if the Duke Eye Clinic will offer free lasik surgery to the acc refs who will undoubtedly blow several calls this Saturday, much to the disgust of the Duke staff, players and fans.

:angry-cussingblack: :angry-cussingwhite: :angry-jumpinganger: :angry-screaming: :angry-steamingears: :angry-teeth: :obscene-birdiedoublegreen: :obscene-birdiedoublered: :obscene-birdiered: :obscene-buttmoon: :obscene-buttred: :obscene-buttsmiley: :obscene-buttsway: :obscene-moneypiss:

Just practicing.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 8:39 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
captmojo wrote:
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Photo I took at the chinese restaurant I ate at today.
:-?

Image
They should have written 'Men', backward in Mandarin.

It would make an interesting painting. :idea:
Here's the picture from inside the bathroom. I guess it's so you know where you are just in case you forgot.
102010130259.jpg

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 8:41 pm
by captmojo
Was it reverse painted on the glass?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 8:54 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
captmojo wrote:Was it reverse painted on the glass?
The women's bathroom was backasswards too. My guess is the signs were ordered afterwards, so they wouldn't look completely stupid. I would have loved to have been there when the doors were delivered. "Fuck it dude, just hang them. The eggrolls are almost ready".

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 9:01 pm
by captmojo
I was unclear. I meant that, were they painted on the inside, for a viewing effect from the front?
reverse on glass.jpg
reverse on glass.jpg (7.28 KiB) Viewed 158 times
Most popular 100 years ago.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: October 20th, 2010, 9:12 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
It was painted on the inside..but not for that reason. :))