Page 1208 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 9:07 pm
by lawgrad91
Lavabe wrote:Note that once one mentions Hitler, the thread stops.
That would mean an END to LTE 2.0!!

:-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 9:25 pm
by Lavabe
lawgrad91 wrote:
Lavabe wrote:Note that once one mentions Hitler, the thread stops.
That would mean an END to LTE 2.0!!

:-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
Of course, if a person does it deliberately to try and end a thread, that person is looked down upon.
:-B

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 10:41 pm
by devildeac
Lavabe wrote:
devildeac wrote:
Lavabe wrote: TWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!

Godwin's Law.
Ahhhh, except I did not invoke Hitler/Nazis in any debate/argument/discussion. Just ridicule of the unc FB program. And there's NO debate there.

Therefore, inadvertent whistle. The play/video will stand as linked/referenced.

:)) =))
Has that icon ever been used before on CTN? :-?
Yes. I used it before when Miles referenced Hitler in his discussion with EJ. I think I used it once and then referenced Godwin's Law but could not remember the name until DukeUsul Wiki'd (Wiki'ed?) it properly.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 10:44 pm
by devildeac
Lavabe wrote:
devildeac wrote:
Lavabe wrote: TWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!

Godwin's Law.
Ahhhh, except I did not invoke Hitler/Nazis in any debate/argument/discussion. Just ridicule of the unc FB program. And there's NO debate there.

Therefore, inadvertent whistle. The play/video will stand as linked/referenced.

:)) =))
I feel like I'm in a Monty Python response.
But you DID invoke Hitler in a discussion... of the Chapaheeya Facebook (FB) Program. There was no debate; it was a discussion.
Note the Wiki definition:
"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches."
You made a comparison between the Ram Lamb Chops and Hitler.
Sorry... the TWEEEEEEEEEEEEET stands.
;)
Not FaceBook, FootBall.
And there was no comparison. It was a link to a video.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 10:44 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
devildeac wrote:
Lavabe wrote: Has that icon ever been used before on CTN? :-?
I'd bet not yet...

:ymdevil:
There are those occasions when DD posts every smilie possible...so it must have been done a few times. :))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 10:49 pm
by devildeac
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
devildeac wrote:
Lavabe wrote: Has that icon ever been used before on CTN? :-?
I'd bet not yet...

:ymdevil:
There are those occasions when DD posts every smilie possible...so it must have been done a few times. :))
He's right. My corrected post several above this said I had used it before but I think you meant individually and that's the way I assumed it.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 11:00 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
Expect to see DevilWearsPrada and maybe ThunderDunk register at CTN in the next few days! :happy-bouncyblue:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 4:26 am
by bjornolf
lawgrad91 wrote:
Lavabe wrote:Note that once one mentions Hitler, the thread stops.
That would mean an END to LTE 2.0!!

:-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

I suppose the mods could step in and delete the post. ;)

"Nothing to see here, folks, just move along. No references to a fascist German dictator were made. The captain will be making a statement later." :Police:

@};-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 7:51 am
by YmoBeThere
Good morning!

Oh wait, wrong thread.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 8:53 am
by Lavabe
bjornolf wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:
Lavabe wrote:Note that once one mentions Hitler, the thread stops.
That would mean an END to LTE 2.0!!

:-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

I suppose the mods could step in and delete the post. ;)

"Nothing to see here, folks, just move along. No references to a fascist German dictator were made. The captain will be making a statement later." :Police:

@};-
This mod isn't getting out of his Barcolounger. :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 8:55 am
by Lavabe
YmoBeThere wrote:Good morning!

Oh wait, wrong thread.
But you know, if Miles is on self-imposed hiatus, perhaps we ought to avoid the thread of his creation, the Good Morning thread, and resume posting Good Morning here on LTE 2.0...
... at least until he comes back.

Good morning!! ~O)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 10:10 am
by TillyGalore
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:Expect to see DevilWearsPrada and maybe ThunderDunk register at CTN in the next few days! :happy-bouncyblue:
Are you having a Carnac moment?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 12:45 pm
by colchar
devildeac wrote:
Colchar is correct.

Heh-heh:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=wanker

Out of curiosity, did anyone not know what 'wanker' meant?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 12:45 pm
by colchar
devildeac wrote:
colchar wrote:
devildeac wrote:
And I got an infraction point for mentioning three real Sweetwater beers named Hummer, Happy Ending and Donkey Punch.
You should've told whichever mod gave you the infraction to get their head out of their arse. If they still refused to change their mind you should've told them to get fucked.
I'm still pondering a link to the British/English definition of wanker...

Is there another definition?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 12:47 pm
by colchar
Lavabe wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:
Lavabe wrote:I feel like I'm in a Monty Python response.
But you DID invoke Hitler in a discussion... of the Chapaheeya Facebook (FB) Program. There was no debate; it was a discussion.
Note the Wiki definition:
"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches."
You made a comparison between the Ram Lamb Chops and Hitler.
Sorry... the TWEEEEEEEEEEEEET stands.
;)
Lavabe, you cited Wiki. Is THAT legal?
You're a lawyer. You tell me. :)) =)) :D

Would it be accepted from a student in a paper?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 12:48 pm
by colchar
Lavabe wrote:
Note that once one mentions Hitler, the thread stops.
That would mean an END to LTE 2.0!!

:-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o :-o

The thread doesn't stop, the person who referenced Hitler or the Nazis just automatically loses the argument by disqualification.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 12:49 pm
by colchar
Lavabe wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:Good morning!

Oh wait, wrong thread.
But you know, if Miles is on self-imposed hiatus, perhaps we ought to avoid the thread of his creation, the Good Morning thread, and resume posting Good Morning here on LTE 2.0...
... at least until he comes back.

Good morning!! ~O)

Why is he on hiatus?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 1:18 pm
by colchar
Where the hell is everyone today ;)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 1:39 pm
by Lavabe
colchar wrote:Where the hell is everyone today ;)
It's NASCAR Happy Hour in Atlanta.

Maybe there's something else going on too.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 4th, 2010, 1:40 pm
by Lavabe
colchar wrote:
Lavabe wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:Good morning!

Oh wait, wrong thread.
But you know, if Miles is on self-imposed hiatus, perhaps we ought to avoid the thread of his creation, the Good Morning thread, and resume posting Good Morning here on LTE 2.0...
... at least until he comes back.

Good morning!! ~O)

Why is he on hiatus?
I think he's actually trying to get done with some big, super-duper, high-tech, secret project. :D