Page 1207 of 2037
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 8:31 pm
by Lavabe
I'm surprised that the filter didn't catch "wanker" and try to replace it with "ass."
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 10:29 pm
by Miles
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 11:10 pm
by devildeac
colchar wrote:OZZIE4DUKE wrote:What a fucking crock of shit. The DBR's software now filters out "ass" when quoted from the HPR.
1) Koaching Koncerns
a) Krzyzewski’s management of the rotation will bite us/has bitten us in the I'm a real wanker for saying this.I'm a real wanker for saying this.I'm a real wanker for saying this..
1) a) I don't need to read this thread, 'cause the HPR says it all.
OH MY GOD! I can't believe the friggin filter on this &#@$%* software actually wankers out the HPR now. Very disappointing.
Now the HPR doesn't say it all. It's a wanker.
Ass isn't allowed but wanker is OK? Typical DBR hypocrisy.
Colchar is correct.
Heh-heh:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=wanker
And I got an infraction point for mentioning three real Sweetwater beers named Hummer, Happy Ending and Donkey Punch.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 2nd, 2010, 11:20 pm
by DevilAlumna
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 12:03 am
by colchar
devildeac wrote:
And I got an infraction point for mentioning three real Sweetwater beers named Hummer, Happy Ending and Donkey Punch.
You should've told whichever mod gave you the infraction to get their head out of their arse. If they still refused to change their mind you should've told them to get fucked.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 12:32 am
by CameronBornAndBred
Need one more "hey".
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 7:55 am
by CathyCA
colchar wrote:devildeac wrote:
And I got an infraction point for mentioning three real Sweetwater beers named Hummer, Happy Ending and Donkey Punch.
You should've told whichever mod gave you the infraction to get their head out of their arse. If they still refused to change their mind you should've told them to get fucked.
Oh believe me, the mods got the message several times over.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 8:55 am
by devildeac
colchar wrote:devildeac wrote:
And I got an infraction point for mentioning three real Sweetwater beers named Hummer, Happy Ending and Donkey Punch.
You should've told whichever mod gave you the infraction to get their head out of their arse. If they still refused to change their mind you should've told them to get fucked.
I'm still pondering a link to the British/English definition of wanker...
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 9:16 am
by DukieInKansas
Colchar's new avatar made me look twice to see if I needed to squash the gnat on my screen. I stopped before I whacked it.
Reminded me of the commercial a few years ago for an exterminator where some people threw things at the cockroach on their tv to kill it only to find out it wasn't a real cockroach.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 9:38 am
by devildeac
DukieInKansas wrote:Colchar's new avatar made me look twice to see if I needed to squash the gnat on my screen. I stopped before I whacked it.
Reminded me of the commercial a few years ago for an exterminator where some people threw things at the cockroach on their tv to kill it only to find out it wasn't a real cockroach.
I'm dummer than I thought. I tried to spray his avatar with insect killer.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 12:45 pm
by devildeac
Y'all gotta go to DBR and read the last page or so of the ncaa/unc thread, especially the
video.
Freaking PIMP funny.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 1:07 pm
by indoor66
devildeac wrote:Y'all gotta go to DBR and read the last page or so of the ncaa/unc thread, especially the
video.
Freaking PIMP funny.
See it here:
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/748a03 ... rel=player
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 3:40 pm
by Lavabe
devildeac wrote:Y'all gotta go to DBR and read the last page or so of the ncaa/unc thread, especially the
video.
Freaking PIMP funny.
TWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!
Godwin's Law.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 4:13 pm
by devildeac
Lavabe wrote:devildeac wrote:Y'all gotta go to DBR and read the last page or so of the ncaa/unc thread, especially the
video.
Freaking PIMP funny.
TWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!
Godwin's Law.
Ahhhh, except I did not invoke Hitler/Nazis in any debate/argument/discussion. Just ridicule of the unc FB program. And there's NO debate there.
Therefore, inadvertent whistle. The play/video will stand as linked/referenced.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 8:01 pm
by YmoBeThere
I rarely venture over yonder at all...destined to be more aggravation than it is worth.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 8:43 pm
by Lavabe
devildeac wrote:Lavabe wrote:devildeac wrote:Y'all gotta go to DBR and read the last page or so of the ncaa/unc thread, especially the
video.
Freaking PIMP funny.
TWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!
Godwin's Law.
Ahhhh, except I did not invoke Hitler/Nazis in any debate/argument/discussion. Just ridicule of the unc FB program. And there's NO debate there.
Therefore, inadvertent whistle. The play/video will stand as linked/referenced.
I feel like I'm in a Monty Python response.
But you DID invoke Hitler in a discussion... of the Chapaheeya Facebook (FB) Program. There was no debate; it was a discussion.
Note the Wiki definition:
"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches."
You made a comparison between the Ram Lamb Chops and Hitler.
Sorry... the TWEEEEEEEEEEEEET stands.
;)
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 8:45 pm
by Lavabe
devildeac wrote:Lavabe wrote:devildeac wrote:Y'all gotta go to DBR and read the last page or so of the ncaa/unc thread, especially the
video.
Freaking PIMP funny.
TWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!
Godwin's Law.
Ahhhh, except I did not invoke Hitler/Nazis in any debate/argument/discussion. Just ridicule of the unc FB program. And there's NO debate there.
Therefore, inadvertent whistle. The play/video will stand as linked/referenced.
Has that icon ever been used before on CTN?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 8:47 pm
by lawgrad91
Lavabe wrote:I feel like I'm in a Monty Python response.
But you DID invoke Hitler in a discussion... of the Chapaheeya Facebook (FB) Program. There was no debate; it was a discussion.
Note the Wiki definition:
"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches."
You made a comparison between the Ram Lamb Chops and Hitler.
Sorry... the TWEEEEEEEEEEEEET stands.
;)
Lavabe, you cited Wiki. Is THAT legal?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 8:48 pm
by Lavabe
lawgrad91 wrote:Lavabe wrote:I feel like I'm in a Monty Python response.
But you DID invoke Hitler in a discussion... of the Chapaheeya Facebook (FB) Program. There was no debate; it was a discussion.
Note the Wiki definition:
"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches."
You made a comparison between the Ram Lamb Chops and Hitler.
Sorry... the TWEEEEEEEEEEEEET stands.
;)
Lavabe, you cited Wiki. Is THAT legal?
You're a lawyer. You tell me.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 3rd, 2010, 8:52 pm
by Lavabe