Page 1203 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 2:41 am
by colchar
DukieInKansas wrote:
I felt a bit guilty when I did it as the tar heel in question is a very nice person, with one glaring flaw. There were two other Duke fans in the room. They weren't willing to touch the bag.

Did you cleanse yourself, both physically and spiritually, after touching it?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 2:42 am
by colchar
devildeac wrote: Ink=tatoos

Never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I personally hate tattoos.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 9:49 am
by DukieInKansas
colchar wrote:
DukieInKansas wrote:
I felt a bit guilty when I did it as the tar heel in question is a very nice person, with one glaring flaw. There were two other Duke fans in the room. They weren't willing to touch the bag.

Did you cleanse yourself, both physically and spiritually, after touching it?
I was in church, so that helped with the cleansing. And it was a Methodist church - so doubly cleansing. :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 11:02 am
by devildeac
colchar wrote:
devildeac wrote: Ink=tatoos

Never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I personally hate tattoos.
I was kidding when I said the women in EJ's pix needed tatoos. His pix followed those of some NFL player with lots of tats and Cathy said she liked his bod but not the tats. I am no fan of ink.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 4:58 pm
by lawgrad91
Registered users: CathyCA, lawgrad91

Turning the place over to the lawyers, are we? :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 5:21 pm
by CathyCA
lawgrad91 wrote:Registered users: CathyCA, lawgrad91

Turning the place over to the lawyers, are we? :D
We rule.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 5:23 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
CathyCA wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:Registered users: CathyCA, lawgrad91

Turning the place over to the lawyers, are we? :D
We rule.
You always do!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 7:19 pm
by YmoBeThere
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
CathyCA wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:Registered users: CathyCA, lawgrad91

Turning the place over to the lawyers, are we? :D
We rule.
You always do!
I thought it was the judges who did that.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 8:40 pm
by lawgrad91
We just like the judges to think they rule. (In reality, the clerks rule!)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:09 pm
by devildeac
CathyCA wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:Registered users: CathyCA, lawgrad91

Turning the place over to the lawyers, are we? :D
We rule.
No, I believe the judge rules. :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:10 pm
by CathyCA
What is a Vegan chicken salad sandwich?

One of my friends just posted that she'd gotten one at Whole Foods.

When did CHICKEN salad become VEGAN?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:10 pm
by CathyCA
devildeac wrote:
CathyCA wrote:
lawgrad91 wrote:Registered users: CathyCA, lawgrad91

Turning the place over to the lawyers, are we? :D
We rule.
No, I believe the judge rules. :D
We tell them how to rule.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:34 pm
by devildeac
CathyCA wrote:
devildeac wrote:
CathyCA wrote: We rule.
No, I believe the judge rules. :D
We tell them how to rule.
OK.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:34 pm
by devildeac
This is pretty damned impressive:

In total there are 17 users online :: 11 registered, 0 hidden and 6 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)


Registered users: ArkieDukie, CameronBornAndBred, devildeac, EarlJam, gadzooks, Johnboy, Lavabe, lawgrad91, OZZIE4DUKE, TNTDevil, YmoBeThere

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:37 pm
by Lavabe
devildeac wrote:This is pretty damned impressive:

In total there are 17 users online :: 11 registered, 0 hidden and 6 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)


Registered users: ArkieDukie, CameronBornAndBred, devildeac, EarlJam, gadzooks, Johnboy, Lavabe, lawgrad91, OZZIE4DUKE, TNTDevil, YmoBeThere
Can't keep up with the moderating... ;) :))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:42 pm
by devildeac
Lavabe wrote:
devildeac wrote:This is pretty damned impressive:

In total there are 17 users online :: 11 registered, 0 hidden and 6 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)


Registered users: ArkieDukie, CameronBornAndBred, devildeac, EarlJam, gadzooks, Johnboy, Lavabe, lawgrad91, OZZIE4DUKE, TNTDevil, YmoBeThere
Can't keep up with the moderating... ;) :))
Just concentrate on the mayo posts.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:44 pm
by YmoBeThere
devildeac wrote:OK.
No disagreement DD?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:47 pm
by devildeac
YmoBeThere wrote:
devildeac wrote:OK.
No disagreement DD?
I just thought lawyers advised but the judge still made the ruling, but I don't work in a court room so I'll defer to Cathy.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:47 pm
by devildeac
Even more work for the mods:

In total there are 18 users online :: 14 registered, 0 hidden and 4 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)

Registered users: ArkieDukie, CameronBornAndBred, CathyCA, Devil in the Blue Dress, DevilAlumna, devildeac, DukeUsul, DukieInKansas, Johnboy, Lavabe, lawgrad91, TNTDevil, wolfpackdevil, YmoBeThere
:)) =))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 31st, 2010, 10:52 pm
by CathyCA
devildeac wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:
devildeac wrote:OK.
No disagreement DD?
I just thought lawyers advised but the judge still made the ruling, but I don't work in a court room so I'll defer to Cathy.
We tell them how to rule. Sometimes they listen to us, sometimes they don't.