Page 1191 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:22 am
by ArkieDukie
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:
Lavabe wrote:OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
Gee, now I have a method named after me! :D Obviously not used to post this response! =))
Hey, you're talking to someone whose dissertation is only 150 pages long. PWing is not in my nature. ;)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:23 am
by Lavabe
NONE of Ozzie's exhibition this morning would have been possible had devildeac been online. Ozzie took FULL advantage of dd's absence.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:25 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
ArkieDukie wrote:
Lavabe wrote:
Lavabe wrote:OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy. :-B
Could be. I always associate The devildeac Method as responding to a string of posts, even your own. Does devildeac usually break words up into syllables to make multiple posts? If not, that could be the Ozzie Variation on the devildeac Method. ;)
I broke the string into words, except for encourage ment, and quoted each previous word vertically in the current

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:25 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:
Lavabe wrote:OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy. :-B
Could be. I always associate The devildeac Method as responding to a string of posts, even your own. Does devildeac usually break words up into syllables to make multiple posts? If not, that could be the Ozzie Variation on the devildeac Method. ;)
I broke the string into words, except for encourage ment, and quoted each previous word vertically in the current
post

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:26 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:
Lavabe wrote:OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy. :-B
Could be. I always associate The devildeac Method as responding to a string of posts, even your own. Does devildeac usually break words up into syllables to make multiple posts? If not, that could be the Ozzie Variation on the devildeac Method. ;)
I broke the string into words, except for encourage ment, and quoted each previous word vertically in the current
post
:D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:26 am
by Lavabe
Just had a honeycrisp apple! :-BD

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:59 am
by lawgrad91
Lavabe wrote:Just had a honeycrisp apple! :-BD
I just had a Fuji. Meh.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 11:11 am
by devildeac
CathyCA wrote:I don't think that anyone has ever tried to PW by dividing a word into its syllables.

Ozzie got 2 posts out of a 4 syllable word. Next time, go ahead and get 4 posts out of it, Ozzie! :D
Next thing you know, we'll have PWing by posting a letter at the time instead of syllables in order to complete words.

:think:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 11:12 am
by devildeac
devildeac wrote:
CathyCA wrote:I don't think that anyone has ever tried to PW by dividing a word into its syllables.

Ozzie got 2 posts out of a 4 syllable word. Next time, go ahead and get 4 posts out of it, Ozzie! :D
Next thing you know, we'll have PWing by posting a letter at the time instead of syllables in order to complete words.

:think:
Now I wish I hadn't posted that. 8-|

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 11:14 am
by devildeac
Lavabe wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:
Lavabe wrote:OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy. :-B
:ymdevil:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 11:19 am
by devildeac
ArkieDukie wrote:
Lavabe wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy. :-B
Could be. I always associate The devildeac Method as responding to a string of posts, even your own. Does devildeac usually break words up into syllables to make multiple posts? If not, that could be the Ozzie Variation on the devildeac Method. ;)
The devildeac Method is to respond to as many posts as he possibly can within reason and certain time constraints. Devildeac does not break words up into syllables to make multiple posts. This could certainly be the Ozzie Variation or Corollary.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 11:22 am
by devildeac
devildeac wrote:
CathyCA wrote:I don't think that anyone has ever tried to PW by dividing a word into its syllables.

Ozzie got 2 posts out of a 4 syllable word. Next time, go ahead and get 4 posts out of it, Ozzie! :D
Next thing you know, we'll have PWing by posting a letter at the time instead of syllables in order to complete words.

:think:
Hmmm...

I am approaching somewhat of a milestone myself at this time...

Nah, just couldn't do it.

:ymdevil:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 11:22 am
by devildeac
devildeac wrote:
devildeac wrote:
CathyCA wrote:I don't think that anyone has ever tried to PW by dividing a word into its syllables.

Ozzie got 2 posts out of a 4 syllable word. Next time, go ahead and get 4 posts out of it, Ozzie! :D
Next thing you know, we'll have PWing by posting a letter at the time instead of syllables in order to complete words.

:think:
Hmmm...

I am approaching somewhat of a milestone myself at this time...

Nah, just couldn't do it.

:ymdevil:
Maybe later.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 11:48 am
by CameronBornAndBred
devildeac wrote: Devildeac does not break words up into syllables to make multiple posts. This could certainly be the Ozzie Variation or Corollary.
Devildeac talks about himself in the third person. :-?
Soon...it will be "The Devildeac". :))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 12:26 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
devildeac wrote:
Lavabe wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy. :-B
Could be. I always associate The devildeac Method as responding to a string of posts, even your own. Does devildeac usually break words up into syllables to make multiple posts? If not, that could be the Ozzie Variation on the devildeac Method. ;)
The devildeac Method is to respond to as many posts as he possibly can within reason and certain time constraints. Devildeac does not break words up into syllables to make multiple posts. This could certainly be the Ozzie Variation or Corollary.
As long as it's a corollary and not a coronary! =))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 12:27 pm
by OZZIE4DUKE
To the golf course! :happy-bouncyblue:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 12:42 pm
by devildeac
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
devildeac wrote: Devildeac does not break words up into syllables to make multiple posts. This could certainly be the Ozzie Variation or Corollary.
Devildeac talks about himself in the third person. :-?
Soon...it will be "The Devildeac". :))
I'd watch out for the next bus you see rolling through your 'hood.

:)) =)) :ymdevil:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 12:47 pm
by devildeac
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
devildeac wrote:
Lavabe wrote:I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy. :-B
Could be. I always associate The devildeac Method as responding to a string of posts, even your own. Does devildeac usually break words up into syllables to make multiple posts? If not, that could be the Ozzie Variation on the devildeac Method. ;)
The devildeac Method is to respond to as many posts as he possibly can within reason and certain time constraints. Devildeac does not break words up into syllables to make multiple posts. This could certainly be the Ozzie Variation or Corollary.
As long as it's a corollary and not a coronary! =))
Don't worry, I'll be watching for the latter after I say what's on your plates at Brunchgates this year. :|

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 1:00 pm
by colchar
devildeac wrote:
CathyCA wrote:I don't think that anyone has ever tried to PW by dividing a word into its syllables.

Ozzie got 2 posts out of a 4 syllable word. Next time, go ahead and get 4 posts out of it, Ozzie! :D
Next thing you know, we'll have PWing by posting a letter at the time instead of syllables in order to complete words.

:think:


I'm pretty sure I've done that.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 1:13 pm
by ArkieDukie
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
devildeac wrote: Devildeac does not break words up into syllables to make multiple posts. This could certainly be the Ozzie Variation or Corollary.
Devildeac talks about himself in the third person. :-?
Soon...it will be "The Devildeac". :))
You beat me to it! =))