Page 1190 of 2037
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:54 am
by lawgrad91
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:55 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:55 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:55 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:55 am
by CathyCA
If you wear a choir robe, you can wear Duke shorts to church.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:56 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:56 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:57 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:57 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:58 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:58 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five
four
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:59 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five
four
three
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:59 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five
four
three
two to
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:59 am
by Lavabe
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:01 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five
four
three
two to
go! Make that one more, not to be posted here!
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:01 am
by Lavabe
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:17 am
by ArkieDukie
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:18 am
by Lavabe
ArkieDukie wrote:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method.
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:18 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
ArkieDukie wrote:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method.
Gee, now I have a method named after me!
Obviously not used to post this response!
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:20 am
by ArkieDukie
Lavabe wrote:ArkieDukie wrote:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method.
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy.
Could be. I always associate The devildeac Method as responding to a string of posts, even your own. Does devildeac usually break words up into syllables to make multiple posts? If not, that could be the Ozzie Variation on the devildeac Method. ;)