Page 1190 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:54 am
by lawgrad91
I can't PW any more. I was informed I needed to be ready to leave for church (!) in 20 minutes! I guess my Columbia Fire Dept T-shirt and Duke bball shorts weren't thought to be appropriate.

How could Duke shorts not be appropriate at a METHODIST church? :duke: :duke: :9f: :9f:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:55 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:55 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:55 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:55 am
by CathyCA
lawgrad91 wrote:I can't PW any more. I was informed I needed to be ready to leave for church (!) in 20 minutes! I guess my Columbia Fire Dept T-shirt and Duke bball shorts weren't thought to be appropriate.

How could Duke shorts not be appropriate at a METHODIST church? :duke: :duke: :9f: :9f:
If you wear a choir robe, you can wear Duke shorts to church.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:56 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:56 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:57 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:57 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:58 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:58 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five
four

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:59 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five
four
three

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:59 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five
four
three
two to

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 8:59 am
by Lavabe
YAY!!! :ymapplause: :ymapplause: :ymapplause:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:01 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
OZZIE4DUKE wrote:
YmoBeThere wrote:You can do it!
Thanks
for
the
encourage
ment
:D
Jeez
,
I
might
as
well
go
for
it
-
only
six
five
four
three
two to
go! Make that one more, not to be posted here! :D :happy-bouncyblue: :9f:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:01 am
by Lavabe
OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:17 am
by ArkieDukie
Lavabe wrote:OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:18 am
by Lavabe
ArkieDukie wrote:
Lavabe wrote:OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy. :-B

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:18 am
by OZZIE4DUKE
ArkieDukie wrote:
Lavabe wrote:OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
Gee, now I have a method named after me! :D Obviously not used to post this response! =))

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: August 22nd, 2010, 9:20 am
by ArkieDukie
Lavabe wrote:
ArkieDukie wrote:
Lavabe wrote:OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! OZ-ZIE! :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue: :happy-bouncyblue:
You're slacking, Lavabe. You could've made this into something like 22 posts using the Ozzie Method. :ymdevil:
I believe devildeac holds the patent on that strategy. :-B
Could be. I always associate The devildeac Method as responding to a string of posts, even your own. Does devildeac usually break words up into syllables to make multiple posts? If not, that could be the Ozzie Variation on the devildeac Method. ;)