crazietalk.net

devildeac wrote:

CathyCA wrote:
I thought the term was "drivel."

It is. Methinks a bit of fun was being poked here.

Oh. I obviously have no sense of humor! ;)

devildeac wrote:

Lavabe wrote:

CathyCA wrote:I thought the term was "drivel."

I only go over there for the DRIBBLE (the hoops, that is).

If you go over twice, is that double dribble?

And if you go over there and here, that would be a cross-over dribble. [/quote]

Or you could get an "over and back" call.

indoor66 wrote:

devildeac wrote:

Lavabe wrote:I only go over there for the DRIBBLE (the hoops, that is).

If you go over twice, is that double dribble?

And if you go over there and here, that would be a cross-over dribble.

Or you could get an "over and back" call. [/quote]
And THAT would certainly warrant an "infraction ." ;)

Or at least some loss of "reputation."

devildeac wrote:If you go over twice, is that double dribble?

indoor66 wrote:Or you could get an "over and back" call.

Who would you rather have making the call: Wirtz, Hess, Paparo, or rhymes with Dumbo?

Lavabe wrote:

devildeac wrote:If you go over twice, is that double dribble?

indoor66 wrote:Or you could get an "over and back" call.

Who would you rather have making the call: Wirtz, Hess, Paparo, or rhymes with Dumbo?

Wouldn't matter. The call will always go against Duke (fans).