Page 527 of 2037
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 8:19 pm
by CathyCA
CellR wrote:CathyCA wrote:I wonder if throaty read all of the posts on the LTE during his drive-by today.
Haha, he's probably still working on it if he did/is.
P.S. Right now you have 1337 posts. For all of you non-computer nerds it means "leet", derived from the word "elite".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet
And now I have 1338 posts, which means this post is superior to my pervious post! 1338>1337.
I'm 1338/uber-leet.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:17 pm
by Miles
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:24 pm
by Rolvix
Wow. It goes 38 mph!? That's impressive!
Although, I would hate to get in trouble for something that stupid.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:26 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
CellR wrote:
Wow. It goes 38 mph!? That's impressive!
Although, I would hate to get in trouble for something that stupid.
Ahem!.....You already have!
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:28 pm
by Rolvix
CameronBornAndBred wrote:CellR wrote:
Wow. It goes 38 mph!? That's impressive!
Although, I would hate to get in trouble for something that stupid.
Ahem!.....You already have!
Hey, I wasn't driving a barstool. And I wasn't drinking.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:28 pm
by Rolvix
CameronBornAndBred wrote:CellR wrote:
But really, it's sad that so many prominent people have died recently...
Especially the ones who had a large impact on the world (MJ, Les Paul...)
Too cross thread...one of my favorite Family Guy lines is when they rip some group of the week a new one, and they follow it up with
"Naw, but really"
Back to your regularly scheduled thread....
I think that's one of those camp phrases, that, by the end of the summer, is used by EVERYONE at camp (Camp Don Lee). I'm pretty sure that was a new addition this year.
(Decided to copy this to the LTE to keep that thread on topic.
)
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:30 pm
by captmojo
What does 'on topic' mean?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:44 pm
by Rolvix
captmojo wrote:What does 'on topic' mean?
I'm not completely certain, but I think it has to do with... Actually, I have no idea. CB&B just mentioned it in the other thread, and it seemed like he didn't want it to happen in that thread.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:45 pm
by captmojo
Surely it can't apply to this thread.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:51 pm
by Rolvix
captmojo wrote:Surely it can't apply to this thread.
I sure hope not. I'll google it to make sure.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:53 pm
by Lavabe
We went out to dinner. Did I miss anything this evening?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:55 pm
by Rolvix
Wikipedia says: A contribution is on-topic if it is within the bounds of the current discussion and off-topic if not
It is a common courtesy to mark a new off-topic posting or email by beginning it with "OT"[citation needed] - for example in a forum discussing the Linux operating system someone might post: "OT: Wow, did you feel that earthquake?".
I'm tempted to change the description to LTE 2.0. Cyber Vandalism isn't my style though.
OT: I didn't know "Netiquette" was a word.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 9:55 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
CellR wrote:captmojo wrote:What does 'on topic' mean?
I'm not completely certain, but I think it has to do with... Actually, I have no idea. CB&B just mentioned it in the other thread, and it seemed like he didn't want it to happen in that thread.
Who did what where? That's crazietalk..I've been in a coma since Tuesday, you can't blame me. It was that other guy,...over there..--->
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 10:00 pm
by Lavabe
CameronBornAndBred wrote:CellR wrote:captmojo wrote:What does 'on topic' mean?
I'm not completely certain, but I think it has to do with... Actually, I have no idea. CB&B just mentioned it in the other thread, and it seemed like he didn't want it to happen in that thread.
Who did what where? That's crazietalk..I've been in a coma since Tuesday, you can't blame me. It was that other guy,...over there..--->
Or do you mean "over yonder?" Or is it yon? ;)
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 10:04 pm
by Lavabe
Where's Ymo?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 10:05 pm
by CameronBornAndBred
Lavabe wrote:Where's Ymo?
Probably still in recovery.
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 10:06 pm
by Rolvix
CameronBornAndBred wrote:Lavabe wrote:Where's Ymo?
Probably still in recovery.
It's only been what? 8 days?
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 10:09 pm
by Lavabe
CellR wrote:CameronBornAndBred wrote:Lavabe wrote:Where's Ymo?
Probably still in recovery.
It's only been what? 8 days?
And eight nights too.
We really need some Ymo action here...
If Ymo was here, he'd say something like.... WE NEED MORE NAME-CHANTING HERE:
We want Y-Mo,
We want Y-Mo,
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 10:28 pm
by Rolvix
Give me a Y!
Y!!!!!
Give me a M!
M!!!!!
Give me an O!
O!!!!
What does that spell? YMO!
What does that stand for? I have no idea!
Re: LTE 2.0
Posted: September 17th, 2009, 10:33 pm
by Rolvix
800! Not a real milestone, but I'm getting there...
Anyways, it's nice to see the smilies fixed!!!
Except the super-nerd seems to have disappeared.