Page 521 of 2037

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 4:23 pm
by Bostondevil
Pink sportswear size 4T or less does not count.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 4:28 pm
by Bostondevil
CellR, sounds like either a chemical exposure, a Norwalk style virus is running around your school, or the third option which I really hope is not the case but I'll be honest, it's the first one I thought of "somebody got a bad batch". I've never fallen into seizure but up until that point it sounds like what happens to me when I'm exposed to WD40. Allergies to inhalants can act like that, was there any heavy duty cleaning going on at the school, new carpets, paint jobs?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 6:04 pm
by Rolvix
Miles wrote:
CellR wrote:So, one of my good friends fainted and fell out of her chair today in AP Earth/Environmental Science....
Yikes buddy. First, I hope your friend and classmates are all okay, both physically and emotionally.

Do you know if the administration has plans to investigate potential causes? Perhaps it was your experiment, or some other cause like tainted building materials, poor ventilation, etc.

Vibes to everyone!
I have no idea, I would give it about a 50/50 chance that they investigate it, but who knows.
I think they are both fine. I know that the first one, one of my good friends, is doing better.
Bostondevil wrote:CellR, sounds like either a chemical exposure, a Norwalk style virus is running around your school, or the third option which I really hope is not the case but I'll be honest, it's the first one I thought of "somebody got a bad batch". I've never fallen into seizure but up until that point it sounds like what happens to me when I'm exposed to WD40. Allergies to inhalants can act like that, was there any heavy duty cleaning going on at the school, new carpets, paint jobs?
A chemical exposure is definitely possible. I have no idea what a Norwalk style virus is. I can pretty much guarantee you the "Bad Batch" cause isn't the case -- at least for the first girl (my friends). However, the second one might have been possible...

At this point, I think that the cause is the sulfur produced by the fish tank full of algae. The room had a tinge of a sulfur smell the entire period, which was no doubt a result of what they did in first period. We are studying how oxygen fluctuates in water. Apparently, my friend is extremely allergic to sulfur, so it wouldn't be a stretch to hypothesize that sitting in our class for an hour, with sulfur in the air, caused the reaction. It also makes sense for the second case as well. It seems like it would be too great of a coincidence for both girls to seize/pass out within five minutes of each other due to separate causes.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 6:15 pm
by DukieInKansas
CellR wrote:
Miles wrote:
CellR wrote:So, one of my good friends fainted and fell out of her chair today in AP Earth/Environmental Science....
Yikes buddy. First, I hope your friend and classmates are all okay, both physically and emotionally.

Do you know if the administration has plans to investigate potential causes? Perhaps it was your experiment, or some other cause like tainted building materials, poor ventilation, etc.

Vibes to everyone!
I have no idea, I would give it about a 50/50 chance that they investigate it, but who knows.
I think they are both fine. I know that the first one, one of my good friends, is doing better.
Bostondevil wrote:CellR, sounds like either a chemical exposure, a Norwalk style virus is running around your school, or the third option which I really hope is not the case but I'll be honest, it's the first one I thought of "somebody got a bad batch". I've never fallen into seizure but up until that point it sounds like what happens to me when I'm exposed to WD40. Allergies to inhalants can act like that, was there any heavy duty cleaning going on at the school, new carpets, paint jobs?
A chemical exposure is definitely possible. I have no idea what a Norwalk style virus is. I can pretty much guarantee you the "Bad Batch" cause isn't the case -- at least for the first girl (my friends). However, the second one might have been possible...

At this point, I think that the cause is the sulfur produced by the fish tank full of algae. The room had a tinge of a sulfur smell the entire period, which was no doubt a result of what they did in first period. We are studying how oxygen fluctuates in water. Apparently, my friend is extremely allergic to sulfur, so it wouldn't be a stretch to hypothesize that sitting in our class for an hour, with sulfur in the air, caused the reaction. It also makes sense for the second case as well. It seems like it would be too great of a coincidence for both girls to seize/pass out within five minutes of each other due to separate causes.
Sounds like a case for Dr. House.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 6:26 pm
by Bostondevil
Sulfur allergies exist and are not all that rare.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 6:53 pm
by TillyGalore
I wore my bright pink Duke shirt Saturday. Since Duke won the game, I'm wondering if I need to keep wearing the shirt every game.

Though, I hate pink being used to promote sports teams. It's just not right. If you are a fan, then you should wear the teams colors, even if they don't go with your complexion. I wear black and orange when I go to an O's game. I will not wear pink.

Now, if I had a little girl, I'd dress her in Duke pink, Bulls pink, Orioles pink, etc. But, once she got older, she'd be in team colors.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 8:52 pm
by CathyCA
Miles wrote:
DukeUsul wrote:When a kid is that young and has no hair, you are required by law to dress them in girly or boyish colors so people don't feel awkward when they come up and say "Oooh, what an adorable b... g... child!"

So good thing they make pink Duke clothes for babies!
I always cover my ass with the quick-fire, three question attack. Goes like this.
"What a cute baby! How old? Name? Brothers and sisters?"

If someone doesn't divulge the baby's gender after these questions, I just keep referring to the baby as 'baby'. I haven't made an ass out of myself yet. Well, I mean of course I have, but not at least for that reason.
The name theory works unless the baby has an androgynous name like Taylor, Tyler, Alex, Devin, Cameron, Madison, Morgan, etc.,

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 9:37 pm
by TillyGalore
I can't believe it's 9:37 p.m. and I'm all by myself. Oh well, time for bed. i-) i-) i-) i-) i-) i-)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 9:44 pm
by CathyCA
Proud Mom moment: My younger son just qualified for the Duke TIP 7th grade talent search. He'll be taking the SAT in December. :D

Frustrating Ex-Lax moment 15 minutes ago: "What if he does well enough on the SAT to get in the summer program? He can't go. He's supposed to be with MEEEEEEEEEEEEE this summer." Yup, Buttwipe, it's all about YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU, isn't it? (Why isn't there an emoticon for the one-fingered salute?)

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:07 pm
by TillyGalore
CathyCA wrote:Proud Mom moment: My younger son just qualified for the Duke TIP 7th grade talent search. He'll be taking the SAT in December. :D

Frustrating Ex-Lax moment 15 minutes ago: "What if he does well enough on the SAT to get in the summer program? He can't go. He's supposed to be with MEEEEEEEEEEEEE this summer." Yup, Buttwipe, it's all about YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU, isn't it? (Why isn't there an emoticon for the one-fingered salute?)
Shin kicks to ex-lax.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:34 pm
by wilson
Bostondevil wrote:
wilson wrote:
Bostondevil wrote:Tom Brady with 2 minutes to play! If we're gonna talk quarterbacks, I mean.
Oh, please. He was handed that game on a plate last night. He's of course clutch, but last night's victory is by no means legendary according to Brady standards.
I didn't mention last night. But since you did, how 'bout them Pats! I didn't get to see even a single play of Falcons/Dolphins. They showed us Texans/Jets and Vikings/Browns(!?!).

Do you hate all Boston teams, wilson?
I do not hate Boston teams other than the red sox. It irritates me that for fully 6-8 weeks of the year, ESPN et. al. would have us believe that professional sports are only played in New York and Boston.
My above observation is merely an objective (and I think accurate) assessment of this past weekend's Patriots game, and Tom Brady in general. Like Roger Federer, I must respect him as a transcendent champion at the very least. But to classify the recent victory against the Bills among his classics is simply erroneous.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:40 pm
by wilson
TillyGalore wrote:I wore my bright pink Duke shirt Saturday. Since Duke won the game, I'm wondering if I need to keep wearing the shirt every game.

Though, I hate pink being used to promote sports teams. It's just not right. If you are a fan, then you should wear the teams colors, even if they don't go with your complexion. I wear black and orange when I go to an O's game. I will not wear pink.

Now, if I had a little girl, I'd dress her in Duke pink, Bulls pink, Orioles pink, etc. But, once she got older, she'd be in team colors.
Keep the pink shirt rocking. Not at any point in the past decade (including Saturday) have I believed any Duke football team could turn in a second-half comeback like that. I know I'm reprising my wardrobe from last Saturday.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:44 pm
by devildeac
Test :

Image

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:46 pm
by CathyCA
devildeac wrote:Test :

Image
I have one of those hats.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:47 pm
by Lavabe
CellR wrote:At this point, I think that the cause is the sulfur produced by the fish tank full of algae. The room had a tinge of a sulfur smell the entire period, which was no doubt a result of what they did in first period. We are studying how oxygen fluctuates in water. Apparently, my friend is extremely allergic to sulfur, so it wouldn't be a stretch to hypothesize that sitting in our class for an hour, with sulfur in the air, caused the reaction. It also makes sense for the second case as well. It seems like it would be too great of a coincidence for both girls to seize/pass out within five minutes of each other due to separate causes.
Two years ago, my daughter was one of two girls to seize/pass out within five minutes of each other during a chorus practice... before singing. Even more bizarre... both girls have the same first name.

Hard to believe... but true. And now you know the RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREST of the story!

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:47 pm
by Rolvix
devildeac wrote:Test :

Image
Is this a secret message?

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:50 pm
by Rolvix
So tomorrow I'm going to talk/interview (Kind of informal) with a distant/not too distant family friend about getting her to write me a recommendation. She is a radiologist, graduated from Duke, sent four kids to Duke (and one daughter to Yale, who is currently playing field hockey there), and is first in her MBA class at Yale... Good gracious. I hope she likes me! I don't think I've seen her in four or five years.

Send me some vibes, please! :D

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:52 pm
by Lavabe
Miles wrote:
DukeUsul wrote:When a kid is that young and has no hair, you are required by law to dress them in girly or boyish colors so people don't feel awkward when they come up and say "Oooh, what an adorable b... g... child!"

So good thing they make pink Duke clothes for babies!
I always cover my ass with the quick-fire, three question attack. Goes like this.
"What a cute baby! How old? Name? Brothers and sisters?"

If someone doesn't divulge the baby's gender after these questions, I just keep referring to the baby as 'baby'. I haven't made an ass out of myself yet. Well, I mean of course I have, but not at least for that reason.
Sounds like the old SNL sketch "That's our Pat!!" with Julia Sweeney.

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 10:59 pm
by devildeac
CellR wrote:
devildeac wrote:Test :

Image
Is this a secret message?
No.


I have no clue how to post photos so I am having my older daughter help me as I prepare for "the milestone" in a few minutes. I hope you and the rest of CT approve ;) :D . Stay tuned....

Re: LTE 2.0

Posted: September 15th, 2009, 11:02 pm
by devildeac
CameronBornAndBred wrote:
wilson wrote:
Bostondevil wrote:Ronnie - scheduled C-section - see above baby weight

I'm glad the only C was the last one. Not my preferred method of travel. It's like an airline flight, cramped, uncomfortable, unpleasant, and claustrophobic with one small advantage, if things go right, it doesn't last as long.
From what I understand, you're pretty limited in the number of C-sections they can do on you. My cousin had three and the last time, they told her that another basically wasn't an option.
They could install a zipper.
Or a tubal litigation...(sic) :roll: :)) =))